Search

Background: Rotator cuff tears following anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty increase with duration of follow-up. This study aimed to evaluate contact pressure between the rotator cuff tendons and prosthesis after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and compare these with the tendon-contact pressures in the native shoulder., Methods: Eight entire upper extremities were mounted onto a testing apparatus, and simulated muscle loading was applied to each rotator cuff tendon with the shoulder positioned in abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation. Pressure-sensitive film placed between each tendon and bone was used to measure the resultant tendon contact pressures. Experiments were repeated after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty using standardized implant sizes, and pressure-sensitive film was used to evaluate tendon-prosthesis contact pressure., Results: Both joint angle and shoulder joint replacement surgery had significant effects on the maximum contact pressure measured between the humeral head and all rotator cuff tendons (P < .05) except the teres minor. The supraspinatus demonstrated a significantly larger peak tendon contact pressure after surgery at 45° of abduction relative to that in the native shoulder (mean difference, 0.2 MPa; P = .031), while the subscapularis had a significantly larger maximum contact pressure at 10° of abduction (mean difference, 0.45 MPa; P = .032) and 90° of abduction (mean difference, 0.80 MPa; P = .008) postoperatively., Conclusion: Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty results in significantly larger tendon contact pressures relative to those in the native shoulder. High tendon contact pressures may ultimately predispose rotator cuff tendons to postoperative wear-induced damage and tearing., (Copyright © 2018 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Rotator cuff repair surgery aims to create a secure, pressurized tendon-bone footprint to permit re-establishment of the fibrovascular interface and tendon healing. Flat-braided suture-tape is an alternative suture material to traditional suture-wire that has potential to reproduce a larger repair construct contact area. The objective of this study was to compare contact pressure, area as well as the mechanical fatigue strength between suture-wire and suture-tape Suture-bridge repair constructs in an ovine model., Methods: Sixty lamb infraspinatus tendons were harvested and randomly allocated to three- and four-anchor Suture-bridge repairs performed using either suture-wire or suture-tape. Thirty-two specimens were cyclically loaded for 200 cycles in an Instron testing machine, while tendon gap formation was recorded using a high speed digital motion analysis system. Loading to failure was then performed to evaluate construct ultimate tensile strength and stiffness. The remaining 28 specimens were assessed for repair contact pressure and area using pressure-sensitive film., Results: There was a significantly greater average tendon contact pressure (mean difference: 0.064 MPa, p = 0.04) and area (mean difference: 2.71 mm 2 , p = 0.03) in fiber-tape repair constructs compared to those in fiber-wire constructs for the three-anchor Suture-bridge configuration. The four-anchor suture-tape constructs had a significantly larger ultimate tensile strength than that of the four-anchor suture-wire constructs (mean difference: 56.4 N, p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in gap formation or stiffness between suture-tape and suture-wire constructs (p > 0.05)., Conclusion: Suture-tape offers greater pressurised tendon-bone contact than suture-wire in three-anchor Suture-bridge repairs, while greater mechanical strength is achieved with the use of suture-tape in four-anchor Suture-bridge constructs., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Double-row rotator cuff tendon repair techniques may provide superior contact area and strength compared with single-row repairs, but are associated with higher material expenses and prolonged operating time. The purpose of this study was to evaluate gap formation, ultimate tensile strength and stiffness of a single-row cruciate suture rotator cuff repair construct, and to compare these results with those of the Mason-Allen and SutureBridge repair constructs., Methods: Infraspinatus tendons from 24 spring lamb shoulders were harvested and allocated to cruciate suture, Mason-Allen and SutureBridge repair groups. Specimens were loaded cyclically between 10 and 62 N for 200 cycles, and gap formation simultaneously measured using a high-speed digital camera. Specimens were then loaded in uniaxial tension to failure, and construct stiffness and repair strength were evaluated., Results: Gap formation in the cruciate suture repair was significantly lower than that of the Mason-Allen repair (mean difference = 0.6 mm, P = 0.009) and no different from that of the SutureBridge repair (P > 0.05). Both the cruciate suture repair (mean difference = 15.7 N/mm, P = 0.002) and SutureBridge repair (mean difference = 15.8 N/mm, P = 0.034) were significantly stiffer than that of the Mason-Allen repair; however, no significant differences in ultimate tensile strength between repair groups were discerned (P > 0.05)., Conclusion: The cruciate suture repair construct, which may represent a simple and cost-effective alternative to double-row and double-row equivalent rotator cuff repairs, has comparable biomechanical strength and integrity with that of the SutureBridge repair, and may result in improved construct longevity and tendon healing compared with the Mason-Allen repair., (© 2017 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.)

Purpose: Re-establishment of the native footprint during rotator cuff repair is important for maximizing healing potential and fixation strength. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the contact area, contact pressure, stiffness and tensile strength of a new single-row cruciate suture repair and to compare these results to those of the Mason-Allen, double-row and transosseous repairs., Methods: Infraspinatus tendons from fifty-six lamb shoulders were harvested and randomly assigned to cruciate suture, Mason-Allen, double-row and transosseous repair groups. Repairs were performed over pressure-sensitive film and footprint contact area and pressure measured. Repaired tendon specimens were also loaded in uniaxial tension, and ultimate tensile strength and stiffness measured., Results: The cruciate suture repair established significantly greater footprint contact area compared to the Mason-Allen repair (mean difference = 101 mm(2), p = 0.003). The ultimate tensile strength and stiffness of the double-row repair was significantly higher than that of all other repair groups (p < 0.05). The average footprint contact pressure of the cruciate suture repair (0.78 MPa) was similar to that of the Mason-Allen (0.74 MPa) and double-row repairs (0.79 MPa). The ultimate tensile strength of the cruciate suture repair was significantly greater than that of the transosseous repair (mean difference 62.4 N, p = 0.002)., Conclusion: The cruciate suture repair may improve strength and healing at the repaired tendon rotator cuff insertion relative to other single-row repair techniques. It may represent a faster, easier and more cost-effective alternative to double-row repairs.

The objective of the present study was to determine the instantaneous moment arms of 18 major muscle sub-regions crossing the glenohumeral joint in axial rotation of the humerus during coronal-plane abduction and sagittal-plane flexion. The tendon-excursion method was used to measure instantaneous muscle moment arms in eight entire upper-extremity cadaver specimens. The results showed that the inferior subscapularis was the largest internal rotator; its rotation moment arm peaks were 24.4 and 27.0 mm during abduction and flexion, respectively. The inferior infraspinatus and teres minor were the greatest external rotators; their respective rotation moment arms peaked at 28.3 and 26.5 mm during abduction, and 23.3 and 22.1 mm during flexion. The two supraspinatus sub-regions were external rotators during abduction and internal rotators during flexion. The latissimus dorsi and pectoralis major behaved as internal rotators throughout both abduction and flexion, with the three pectoralis major sub-regions and middle and inferior latissimus dorsi displaying significantly larger internal rotation moment arms with the humerus adducted or flexed than when abducted or extended (p < 0.001). The deltoid behaved either as an internal rotator or an external rotator, depending on the degree of humeral abduction and axial rotation. Knowledge of moment arm differences between muscle sub-regions may assist in identifying the functional effects of muscle sub-region tears, assist surgeons in planning tendon transfer surgery, and aid in the development and validation of biomechanical computer models., (Copyright © 2010 Orthopaedic Research Society.)

Full‐thickness rotator cuff tears can lead to poor coaptation of the humeral head to the glenoid, disrupting muscle forces required for glenohumeral joint stability, ultimately leading to joint subluxation. The aim of this study was to evaluate muscle forces and glenohumeral joint translations during elevation in the presence of isolated and combined full‐thickness rotator cuff tears. Eight fresh‐frozen upper limbs were mounted to a computer‐controlled testing apparatus that simulated joint motion by simulated muscle force application. Scapular‐plane abduction was performed, and glenohumeral joint translations were measured using an optoelectronic system. Testing was performed in the native shoulder, a following an isolated tear to the supraspinatus, as well as combined tears involving the supraspinatus and subscapularis, as well as supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and teres minor. Rotator cuff tears significantly increased middle deltoid force at 30°, 60°, and 90° of abduction relative to that in the native shoulder (p < 0.05). Significantly greater superior translations were observed relative to the intact shoulder due to combined tears to the supraspinatus and infraspinatus at 30° of abduction (mean increase: 1.6 mm, p = 0.020) and 60° of abduction (mean increase: 4.8 mm, p = 0.040). This study illustrates the infraspinatus‐teres minor complex as a major humeral head depressor and contributor to glenohumeral joint stability. An increase in deltoid force during abduction occurs in the presence of rotator cuff tears, which exacerbates superior migration of the humeral head. The findings may help in the development of clinical tests in rotator cuff tear diagnostics, in surgical planning of rotator cuff repair, and in planning of targeted rehabilitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Subacromial impingement (SAI) is associated with shoulder pain and dysfunction and is exacerbated by rotator cuff tears; however, the role of acromioplasty in mitigating subacromial contact in the rotator cuff deficient shoulder remains debated. This study aimed to quantify the influence of isolated and combined tears involving the supraspinatus on subacromial contact during abduction; and second, to evaluate the influence of acromioplasty on joint space size and subacromial contact under these pathological conditions. Eight fresh‐frozen human cadaveric upper limbs were mounted to a computer‐controlled testing apparatus that simulated joint motion by simulated force application. Shoulder abduction was performed while three‐dimensional joint kinematics was measured using an optoelectronic system, and subacromial contact evaluated using a digital pressure sensor secured to the inferior acromion. Testing was performed after an isolated tear to the supraspinatus, as well as tears involving the subscapularis and infraspinatus‐teres minor, both before and after acromioplasty. Rotator cuff tears significantly increased peak subacromial pressure (p < 0.001), average subacromial pressure (p = 0.001), and contact force (p = 0.034) relative to those in the intact shoulder. Following acromioplasty, significantly lower peak subacromial contact pressure, force and area were observed for all rotator cuff tears involving the supraspinatus at 30° of abduction (p < 0.05). Acromioplasty predominantly reduces acromion thickness anteriorly thereby reducing subacromial contact in the rotator cuff deficient shoulder, particularly in early to mid‐abduction where superior glenohumeral joint shear force potential is large. These findings provide a biomechanical basis for acromioplasty as an intervention for SAI syndrome and as an adjunct to rotator cuff repairs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Changes in joint architecture and muscle loading resulting from total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) are known to influence joint stability and prosthesis survivorship. This study aimed to measure changes in muscle moment arms, muscle lines of action, as well as muscle and joint loading following TSA and RSA using a metal‐backed uncemented modular shoulder prosthesis. Eight cadaveric upper extremities were assessed using a customized testing rig. Abduction, flexion, and axial rotation muscle moment arms were quantified using the tendon‐excursion method, and muscle line‐of‐force directions evaluated radiographically pre‐operatively, and after TSA and revision RSA. Specimen‐specific musculoskeletal models were used to estimate muscle and joint loading pre‐ and post‐operatively. TSA lateralized the glenohumeral joint center by 4.3 ± 3.2 mm, resulting in small but significant increases in middle deltoid force (2.0%BW) and joint compression during flexion (2.1%BW) (p < 0.05). Revision RSA significantly increased the moment arms of the major abductors, flexors, adductors, and extensors, and reduced their peak forces (p < 0.05). The superior inclination of the deltoid significantly increased while the inferior inclination of the rotator cuff muscles decreased (p < 0.05). TSA using an uncemented metal‐backed modular shoulder prosthesis effectively restores native joint function; however, lateralization of the glenoid component should be minimized intra‐operatively to mitigate increased glenohumeral joint loading and polyethylene liner contact stresses. Revision RSA reduces muscle forces required during shoulder function but produces greater superior joint shear force and less joint compression. The findings may help to guide component selection and placement to mitigate joint instability after arthroplasty. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:1988–2003, 2019 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rotator cuff tears are known to affect clinical outcome of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA). This study aimed to use computational modelling to quantify the effect of rotator cuff tear severity on muscle and joint forces after RSA, as well as stresses at the glenosphere, base‐plate, fixation screws, scapula, and humeral components. A multi‐body musculoskeletal model of the glenohumeral joint was developed comprising the scapula, humerus and nine major upper limb muscles. Simulations of abduction and flexion after RSA were performed in the case of the intact rotator cuff and tears to (i) supraspinatus; (ii) supraspinatus and infraspinatus, and (iii) supraspinatus, infraspinatus and subscapularis. The intact and supraspinatus deficient rotator cuff resulted in the largest calculated muscle forces, glenohumeral joint contact forces and implant stresses. Peak glenohumeral joint forces during flexion were lower than those during abduction in all cases; however, substantially more posterior joint shear force was generated during flexion than abduction. A tear involving the supraspinatus and infraspinatus reduced glenohumeral joint forces by a factor of 8.7 during abduction (603.1 N) and 7.1 during flexion (520.7 N) compared to those in the supraspinatus deficient shoulder. RSA with an intact or supraspinatus deficient rotator cuff produces large glenohumeral joint forces that may increase base‐plate failure risk, particularly during flexion when posterior shear forces are largest. Infraspinatus tears after RSA greatly reduce glenohumeral joint compression and may ultimately reduce joint stability. Future research ought to focus on experimental validation of subject‐specific muscle recruitment strategies and joint loading after RSA. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The moment arm of a muscle represents its leverage or torque‐producing capacity, and is indicative of the role of the muscle in joint actuation. The objective of this study was to undertake a systematic review of the moment arms of the major muscles spanning the glenohumeral joint during abduction, flexion and axial rotation. Moment arm data for the deltoid, pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi, teres major, supraspinatus, infraspinatus, subscapularis and teres minor were reported when measured using the geometric and tendon excursion methods. The anterior and middle sub‐regions of the deltoid had the largest humeral elevator moment arm values of all muscles during coronal‐ and scapular‐plane abduction, as well as during flexion. The pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi and teres major had the largest depressor moment arms, with each of these muscles exhibiting prominent leverage in shoulder adduction, and the latissimus dorsi and teres major also in extension. The rotator cuff muscles had the largest axial rotation moment arms regardless of the axial position of the humerus. The supraspinatus had the most prominent elevator moment arms during early abduction in both the coronal and scapular planes as well as in flexion. This systematic review shows that the rotator cuff muscles function as humeral rotators and weak humeral depressors or elevators, while the three sub‐regions of the deltoid behave as substantial humeral elevators throughout the range of humeral motion. The pectoralis major, latissimus dorsi and teres major are significant shoulder depressors, particularly during abduction. This study provides muscle moment arm data on functionally relevant shoulder movements that are involved in tasks of daily living, including lifting and pushing. The results may be useful in quantifying shoulder muscle function during specific planes of movement, in designing and validating computational models of the shoulder, and in planning surgical procedures such as tendon transfer surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The management of irreparable rotator cuff tears associated with osteoarthritis of the glenohumeral joint has long been challenging. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) was designed to provide pain relief and improve shoulder function in patients with severe rotator cuff tear arthropathy. While this procedure has been known to reduce pain, improve strength and increase range of motion in shoulder elevation, scapular notching, rotation deficiency, early implant loosening and dislocation have attributed to complication rates as high as 62 %. Patient selection, surgical approach and post-operative management are factors vital to successful outcome of RSA, with implant design and component positioning having a significant influence on the ability of the shoulder muscles to elevate, axially rotate and stabilise the humerus. Clinical and biomechanical studies have revealed that component design and placement affects the location of the joint centre of rotation and therefore the force-generating capacity of the muscles and overall joint mobility and stability. Furthermore, surgical technique has also been shown to have an important influence on clinical outcome of RSA, as it can affect intra-operative joint exposure as well as post-operative muscle function. This review discusses the behaviour of the shoulder after RSA and the influence of implant design, component positioning and surgical technique on post-operative joint function and clinical outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Kinematics of the shoulder girdle obtained from non-invasive measurement systems such as video motion analysis, accelerometers and magnetic tracking sensors has been shown to be adversely affected by instrumentation measurement errors and skin motion artefact. The degree to which musculoskeletal model calculations of shoulder muscle and joint loading are influenced by variations in joint kinematics is currently not well understood. A three-dimensional musculoskeletal model of the upper limb was used to evaluate the sensitivity of shoulder muscle and joint force. Monte-Carlo analyses were performed by randomly perturbing scapular and humeral joint coordinates during abduction and flexion. Muscle and joint force calculations were generally most sensitive to changes in the kinematics of the humerus in elevation and of the scapula in medial-lateral rotation, and were least sensitive to changes in humerus plane of elevation and scapula protraction-retraction. Overall model sensitivity was greater during abduction than flexion, and the influence of specific kinematics perturbations varied from muscle to muscle. In general, muscles that generated greater force, such as the middle deltoid and subscapularis, were more sensitive to changes in shoulder kinematics. This study suggests that musculoskeletal model sensitivity to changes in kinematics is task-specific, and varies depending on the plane of motion. Calculations of shoulder muscle and joint function depend on reliable humeral and scapula motion data, particularly that of humeral elevation and scapula medial-lateral rotation. The findings in this study have implications for the use of kinematic data in musculoskeletal model development and simulations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]