Search

Western rangelands represent approximately 58% of the total arable land in the U.S. and are used primarily for cow-calf production, which has the largest greenhouse gas (GHG) emission footprint of all beef production phases. Further, beef production sustainability concerns involve climate mitigation (reducing GHG output) and adaptation (climate-resilient soil-plant-animals). Precision livestock farming (PLF) may help address sustainability concerns by providing innovative solutions and new opportunities for extensive rangeland production. The use of precision measurement and management tools with precision system models can connect measurement data to inform management capabilities. For example, real-time individual weighing and remote sensing (precision measurement tools) can be used to inform and implement dynamic rotational grazing management using virtual fencing technology (precision management; Menendez et al., 2022, 2023). Recent USDA investment in climatesmart agriculture (CSA) commodities has provided over $3 billion in funding to implement practices to reduce GHG emissions in agriculture production, for which PLF may be one approach to accomplish these goals. The overall purpose is to develop commodities produced using NRCS climate-smart practices (e.g., prescribed grazing, 528) and document reductions to provide market opportunities associated with inset GHG. Currently, South Dakota State University is leading two simultaneous programs, which include precision ranching (virtual fencing, precision weighing, and GHG evaluation) and a beef and bison CSA program (GHG evaluation; 7 producer-owned research ranches, representing more than 1.09 million ha). The scale of the CSA program has revealed that current PLF research has only been a prelude to providing the precision tools necessary to successfully implement CSA practices and document their impact through monitoring, measuring, reporting, and verification (MMRV). This presentation will include rangeland grazing case studies that cover the application of virtual fencing, animal location, behavior tracking, remote sensing, precision weighing, feeding, supplementation, and enteric emissions and soil moisture monitoring on extensive rangelands. Case studies will include an overview of big data processing and precision system model development methods. Increasing awareness of available PLF tools for optimizing grazing management, animal performance, productivity, and associated challenges (maintenance, costs) is essential for meeting livestock and sustainability goals. PLF and data-driven approaches aid in the creation of scalable, cost-effective MMRV protocols and models (soil carbon and enteric GHG) for extensive rangelands (20 to 70,000 ha areas) that allow producers to realize potential CSA market incentives. Further, MMRV will likely help guide management decisions by identifying CSA strategies that build climate-resilient landscapes for sustainable livestock production and other environmental synergies (soil microbiome, bird and insect habit, water retention). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Understanding beef cattle enteric emissions on extensive western U.S. rangeland systems is critical for implementing sustainable grazing practices that reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. These practices must also improve livestock and plant productivity and climate resiliency while maintaining or reducing production costs. However, enteric emissions of grazing cattle under different stocking rates and grazing management strategies are largely unknown for western U.S. rangelands. Thus, our objective was to evaluate the differences in enteric emissions of stocker steers grazing native rangeland. Yearling Angus steers (n = 127) were stratified by initial body weight (BW) to six groups, then randomly assigned to one of six pastures grazed from June to September 2023 at the South Dakota State University Cottonwood Field Station (Cottonwood, SD) as part of a long-term stocking rate trial (80+ yr). Each pasture was equipped with a GreenFeed (C-Lock Inc, Rapid City, SD) pasture system to measure individual animal CH4 and CO2 emissions for continuous grazing (CG) and rotational grazing (RG) strategies in three stocking rates (Light, Moderate, and Heavy, 0.32, 0.40, and 0.72 animal unit months, respectively) in a 2 x 3 factorial design. Differences in enteric emissions among stocking rate and grazing strategy were analyzed using a linear mixed effects model in R, using the lme4 package, with animal as a random effect, and a post-hoc contrast among treatments was assessed using the lsmeans package. Steer initial and final BW were similar (P > 0.05) among treatments. For CH4 emissions, there was a significant interaction between stocking rate and grazing strategy (P < 0.05). Specifically, CH4 emissions for moderate-RG (195 ± 4.3 g/d) were less than those from heavy-CG (221 ± 4.5 g/d) and light-RG (221 ± 4.7 g/d) over the study period (P < 0.05). For CO2 emissions, light-CG steers respired greater CO2 emissions (6892 ± 101 g/d) than heavy-RG (6398 ± 107 g/d; P < 0.05). All other treatment lsmeans were similar (P > 0.05) and intermediate to these treatment effects. The assessment of GHG emission values for cattle grazing native rangeland is essential for informing climate mitigation strategies, improving animal efficiency, and understanding changes in GHG emissions over production phases and across animal classes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spatial utilization of pasture landscapes by grazing animals is often heterogeneous and driven by complex environmental and physiological interactions between plants and animals. Synergistic energy pathways can be modeled using mechanistic relationships describing resource distribution, animal behavior, metabolic energy rate, and pasture utilization using biometric sensors. The objective of this study was to demonstrate the ability to measure the energy landscape by mapping fine-scale contributions to animal energy expenditure, nutrient acquisition, growth, and overall economic profitability. We utilized animal trajectories and location fixes recorded by virtual fencing collars (Vence) daily body weight (BW) using precision livestock scales (Smartscale, C-Lock Inc.) and oxygen consumption (GreenFeeds, C-Lock Inc.) on steers (n = 127), managed as part of a broader project to evaluate environmental synergies in extensive grazing systems. Steers were allocated to one of six native grass pastures assigned to either rotational or continuous grazing strategies, and one of three stocking rates (low, moderate, high) in a 2 x 3 factorial arrangement. Space utilization was quantified as the frequency of fixes located within each cell of a 5 x 5-meter Grid and the distance between grid cells and water was calculated using the Pythagorean theorem. Movement behavior was quantified using Program R to calculate step length, the distance between two temporally continuous fix points utilizing the Pythagorean Theorem, and turn angles calculated as the cosine of the pre- and pro-ceeding step lengths where larger values indicated greater deviation from a straight trajectory. A mixed linear regression model was fitted using the lmer function in the lme4 package. Space utilization decreased with increased distance from water (P < 0.05), with rotational grazing strategies increasing concentration around water sources (P < 0.05). This indicates an opportunity to utilize precision livestock technology to facilitate pasture management and increase space utilization in grazing cattle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Virtual fencing (VF) has the capacity to transform the landscape of livestock management within extensive rangeland systems. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of Vence (Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ) VF technology on yearling steer behavior and performance. Steers were allocated into one of two grazing systems [continuous grazing (CG) or rotational grazing (RG) managed using VF] across three different stocking rates (light, moderate, and heavy, 0.32, 0.40, and 0.72 animal unit months, respectively) for three grazing seasons. Based on initial body weight, steers were randomly blocked into six pastures (346 ± 39, 273 ± 34, and 319 ± 29 kg, respectively) at the South Dakota State University Cottonwood Field Station (n = 127, 135, and 127, in 2021, 2022 and 2023, respectively). Steers assigned to the CG treatment had free access to the entire pasture for the duration of the grazing season. Steers assigned to the RG treatment were rotated among virtual ‘paddocks’ for the duration of the grazing season. The days spent grazing in each paddock for the RG treatment were determined based on bi-weekly clip plots for biomass estimation. The VF collars were used to track steer location at 5-min intervals; only steers assigned to the RG treatment were managed with VF boundaries and exposed to auditory and electrical cues from the collars. Raw data was downloaded from Vence Herd Manager through an automatic programming interface and cleaned by removing messages that failed to transmit correctly or were outside the bounds of study site pastures. Animal behavior metrics of daily distance traveled (DDT), daily grazing time, daily resting time, and daily walking time were calculated for each individual animal and averaged by pasture using Program R. Steer weights were collected using SmartScales (C-Lock Inc, Rapid City, SD). Average daily gain (ADG) was calculated using a linear model to develop a regression equation for each individual animal using weight as the dependent variable and day of trial as the independent variable. The slope of the regression line was used to estimate ADG. Individual DDT, behavior, and performance metrics were analyzed using a mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA) to compare the impact of grazing treatment and stocking rate (fixed effects) with year as the random effect. Treatment did not influence (P > 0.05) grazing, walking, or resting behavior. Similarly, no differences were detected in DDT between treatment groups or across different stocking rates. Furthermore, there were no differences (P > 0.05) in ADG across treatment groups. Implementation of VF had no impact on animal behavior or performance, justifying its use in grazing settings; however, financial and cattle finishing aspects still need to be evaluated to determine its overall benefits and costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]