Search

Aims: The putative role of the rhizosphere in controlling root water uptake is receiving increasing attention. Recent experiments showed that the rhizosphere turned temporarily hydrophobic after drying and subsequent rewetting. Our objective was to investigate whether the rhizosphere hydrophobicity influences the hydraulic conductivity of the rhizosphere-root continuum. Methods: Lupins were grown in aluminium containers filled with a sandy soil. When the plants were 30 days-old, the soil was let dry to a water content of 2-4 % and then it was irrigated. The soil water content during irrigation was imaged using a time-series neutron radiography. By image processing, we quantified the increase in the volume of water in the roots upon irrigation. Using this information and additional measurements of the root pressure after irrigation, we calculated the water flow into the roots and the total hydraulic conductance of the rhizosphere-root continuum, K. Results: The radiographs showed that: 1) the rhizosphere stayed temporarily dry after irrigation; 2) as the rhizosphere slowly rewetted, the roots rehydrated of 63 %. During 2 to 3 h subsequent to irrigation, K increased from 1.36 ± 1.09 × 10 m s MPa to 5.02 ± 2.13 × 10 m s MPa, approaching the conductance of lupin roots in wet soils measured in previous experiments. Based on our calculations, these values of K correspond to a rhizosphere conductivity of 3.87 ± 1.91 × 10 m s (shortly after irrigation) and 1.09 ± 1.64 × 10 m s (2-3 h after irrigation). Conclusions: We conclude that during a drying/wetting cycle, the conductivity of the root-soil interface is a temporary limit to root water uptake. We postulate that the temporary reduced hydraulic conductivity is primarily caused by the rhizosphere water repellency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A common assumption in models of water flow from soil to root is that the soil can be described in terms of its representative or effective behavior. Microscale heterogeneity and structure are thereby replaced by effective descriptions, and their role in flow processes at the root‐soil interface is neglected. Here the aim was to explore whether a detailed characterization of the microscale heterogeneity at the scale of a single root impacts the relation between flow rate and pressure gradient. Numerical simulations of water flow toward a root surface were carried out in a two‐dimensional domain with a randomized configuration of spatially variable unsaturated hydraulic conductivities and varying boundary conditions, that is, increasing and decreasing root water uptake rates. By employing Matheron's method, the soil hydraulic properties were varied, while the effective hydraulic conductivity (corresponding to the geometric mean) remained unchanged. Results show that domains with a uniform conductivity could not capture important features of water flow and pressure distribution in spatially variable domains. Specifically, increasing heterogeneity at the root‐soil interface allowed to sustain higher root water uptake rates but caused a slower recovery in xylem suction after transpiration ceased. The significance of this is that, under critical conditions, when pressure gradients and flow rates are high, microscale heterogeneity may become an important determinant and should not be neglected in adequate descriptions of water flow from soil to root in dry soil. Key Points: At the scale of a single root soil heterogeneity impacts the relation between flow rate and pressure headHere the emergent relation between water flow and pressure head gradient cannot be described by a single effective conductivityExplicitly accounting for soil heterogeneity might give new insights on water flow in soil‐plant‐atmosphere systems [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]