Search

Objective: In-vivo validation on animal setting of a pneumatically propelled robot for endovascular intervention, to determine safety and clinical advantage of robotic cannulations compared to manual operation., Methods: Robotic assistance and image-guided intervention are increasingly used for improving endovascular procedures with enhanced navigation dexterity and accuracy. However, most platforms developed in the past decade still present inherent limitations in terms of altered clinical workflow, counterintuitive human-robot interaction, and a lack of versatility. We have created a versatile, highly integrated platform for robot-assisted endovascular intervention aimed at addressing such limitations, and here we demonstrate its clinical usability through in-vivo animal trials. A detailed in-vivo study on four porcine models conducted with our robotic platform is reported, involving cannulation and balloon angioplasty of five target arteries., Results: The trials showed a 100% success rate, and post-mortem histopathological assessment demonstrated a reduction in the incidence and severity of vessel trauma with robotic navigation versus manual manipulation., Conclusion: In-vivo experiments demonstrated that the applicability of our robotic system within the context of this study was well tolerated, with good feasibility, and low risk profile. Comparable results were observed with robotics and manual cannulation, with clinical outcome potentially in favor of robotics., Significance: This study showed that the proposed robotic platform can potentially improve the execution of endovascular procedures, paving the way for clinical translation.

Minimally invasive techniques have been at the forefront of surgical progress, and the evolution of endovascular robotic technologies has seen a paradigm shift in the focus of future innovation. Endovascular robotic technology may help overcome many of the challenges associated with traditional endovascular techniques by enabling greater control, stability, and precision of target navigation and treatment, while simultaneously reducing operator learning curves and improving safety. Several robotic systems have been developed to perform a broad range of endovascular procedures, but none have been used at scale or widely in routine practice, and the evidence for their safety, effectiveness, and efficiency remains limited. High cost and device complexity, lack of haptic feedback, and limited integration and interoperability with existing equipment and devices are the principal technology, cost, and sustainability barriers to the scalability and widespread adoption in day-to-day practice. In order to fully realize its potential, future robotic innovation must ensure compatibility with a range of off-the-shelf equipment that can be tracked and exchanged quickly during a procedure and come together with developments in navigation, tracking, and imaging. Reducing cost and complexity and supporting sustainability of the technology is key. In parallel, new technologies must be evaluated by clear and transparent standardized outcomes and be accompanied by robust clinical training. Key to the successful future development and dissemination of robotic technology is open collaboration among industry, clinicians, and patients in order to fully understand and address current challenges and enable the technology to realize its full potential., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Cardiovascular diseases are the most common cause of global death. Endovascular interventions, in combination with advanced imaging technologies, are promising approaches for minimally invasive diagnosis and therapy. More recently, teleoperated robotic platforms target improved manipulation accuracy, stabilisation of instruments in the vasculature, and reduction of patient recovery times. However, benefits of recent platforms are undermined by a lack of haptics and residual patient exposure to ionising radiation. The purpose of this research was to design, implement, and evaluate a novel endovascular robotic platform, which accommodates emerging non-ionising magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)., Methods: We proposed a pneumatically actuated MR-safe teleoperation platform to manipulate endovascular instrumentation remotely and to provide operators with haptic feedback for endovascular tasks. The platform task performance was evaluated in an ex vivo cannulation study with clinical experts ( N = 7) under fluoroscopic guidance and haptic assistance on abdominal and thoracic phantoms., Results: The study demonstrated that the robotic dexterity involving pneumatic actuation concepts enabled successful remote cannulation of different vascular anatomies with success rates of 90%-100%. Compared to manual cannulation, slightly lower interaction forces between instrumentation and phantoms were measured for specific tasks. The maximum robotic interaction forces did not exceed 3N., Conclusion: This research demonstrates a promising versatile robotic technology for remote manipulation of endovascular instrumentation in MR environments., Significance: The results pave the way for clinical translation with device deployment to endovascular interventions using non-ionising real-time 3D MR guidance.

Purpose: Endovascular robotics is an emerging technology within the developing field of medical robotics. This was a prospective evaluation to assess safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted carotid artery stenting., Materials and Methods: Consecutive cases of carotid artery stenting cases performed over period of 24 months, from May 2015 to October 2016, using the Magellan Robotic System (Hansen, Mountain View, CA) were included. All cases utilised the robotic system to navigate the arch, obtain a stable position in the common carotid artery, followed by manual manipulation of Embolic Protection Devices and self-expandable stents through the robotic catheter. Patients demographics, clinical indications, anatomical features, technical and clinical success, complication rate and hospital stay were prospectively recorded., Results: Thirteen patients, 10 males (78.5%), with an average age of 68.7 years were treated. Mean follow up time was 30 months. Ten patients (91%) were symptomatic at presentation. Anatomical indications for endovascular stent insertion were previous open surgery to the neck ± radiotherapy (87.5%) and hostile anatomy for open surgery (12.5%). Technical success was 100% and the robotic system demonstrates enhanced stability during arch and lesion crossing. There were no neurological complications post-operatively. Average hospital stay was 3 days (range 2-6 days) and a change in serum creatinine of -7.8 μmol/L. There was no documented case of in stent restenosis, new or worsening neurology during follow-up., Conclusion: These results illustrate safety and feasibility of robotic endovascular revascularisation for carotid disease and demonstrates potential to enhance peri-procedural safety through improved control and stability.

Purpose: Endovascular intervention is limited by two-dimensional intraoperative imaging and prolonged procedure times in the presence of complex anatomies. Robotic catheter technology could offer benefits such as reduced radiation exposure to the clinician and improved intravascular navigation. Incorporating three-dimensional preoperative imaging into a semiautonomous robotic catheterization platform has the potential for safer and more precise navigation. This paper discusses a semiautonomous robotic catheter platform based on previous work (Rafii-Tari et al., in: MICCAI2013, pp 369-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40763-5_46 , 2013) by proposing a method to address anatomical variability among aortic arches. It incorporates anatomical information in the process of catheter trajectories optimization, hence can adapt to the scale and orientation differences among patient-specific anatomies., Methods: Statistical modeling is implemented to encode the catheter motions of both proximal and distal sites based on cannulation data obtained from a single phantom by an expert operator. Non-rigid registration is applied to obtain a warping function to map catheter tip trajectories into other anatomically similar but shape/scale/orientation different models. The remapped trajectories were used to generate robot trajectories to conduct a collaborative cannulation task under flow simulations. Cross-validations were performed to test the performance of the non-rigid registration. Success rates of the cannulation task executed by the robotic platform were measured. The quality of the catheterization was also assessed using performance metrics for manual and robotic approaches. Furthermore, the contact forces between the instruments and the phantoms were measured and compared for both approaches., Results: The success rate for semiautomatic cannulation is 98.1% under dry simulation and 94.4% under continuous flow simulation. The proposed robotic approach achieved smoother catheter paths than manual approach. The mean contact forces have been reduced by 33.3% with the robotic approach, and 70.6% less STDEV forces were observed with the robot., Conclusions: This work provides insights into catheter task planning and an improved design of hands-on ergonomic catheter navigation robots.

Interventional radiology procedures, equipment, and techniques as well as image guidance have developed dramatically over the last few decades. The evidence for minimally invasive interventions in vascular and oncology fields is rapidly growing and several procedures are considered the first line management. However, radiation exposure, image guidance and innovative solutions to known anatomical challenges are still lagging behind. Robotic technology and its role in surgery have been developing at a steady speed. Endovascular robotics are following suit with a different set of problems and targets. This article discusses the advances and limitations in one aspects of endovascular robotic, namely pelvic pathology that includes aneurysms, fibroids, benign prostatic hypertrophy and vascular malformation.

Robotic technology has been used in cardiovascular medicine since the late 1990s. Interventional cardiology, electrophysiology, endovascular surgery, minimally invasive cardiac surgery, and laparoscopic vascular surgery are all fields of application. Robotic devices enable endoscopic reconstructive surgery in narrow spaces and fast, very precise placement of catheters and devices in catheter-based interventions. In all robotic systems, the operator manipulates the robotic arms from a control station or console. In the field of cardiac surgery, mitral valve repair, CABG surgery, atrial septal defect repair, and myxoma resection can be achieved using robotic technology. Furthermore, vascular surgeons can perform a variety of robotically assisted operations to treat aortic, visceral, and peripheral artery disease. In electrophysiology, ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation can be carried out with robotic support. In the past few years, robotically assisted percutaneous coronary intervention and abdominal aortic endovascular surgery techniques have been developed. The basic feasibility and safety of robotic approaches in cardiovascular medicine has been demonstrated, but learning curves and the high costs associated with this technology have limited its widespread use. Nonetheless, increased procedural speed, accuracy, and reduced exposure to radiation and contrast agent in robotically assisted catheter-based interventions, as well as reduced surgical trauma and shortened patient recovery times after robotic cardiovascular surgery are promising achievements in the field.

In recent years, steerable catheter systems have been introduced into clinical practice for cardiac mapping and ablation procedures. As endovascular therapy is becoming more complex, more advanced and versatile catheter designs utilizing robotic technology may have a role in aortic and peripheral arterial interventions. This article discusses alternative steerable catheter designs focusing on robotic endovascular catheter technology. A comprehensive comparison, review and analysis of robotic versus manual techniques in the visceral segment are presented to reveal both their advantages and limitations. Preclinical studies and early experience suggest that robotically steerable endovascular catheters offer improved manoeuvrability at the catheter tip, enhanced positional control and "off-the-wall" centreline navigation in a remote-control fashion. These advanced systems have the potential to overcome some of the technical difficulties with manual catheter control, improve stability at key target areas, reduce the risk of vessel trauma, distal embolization and radiation exposure, whilst improving overall operator performance with short learning curves. Robotic catheter technology may be more suitable to complex and often unpredictable anatomy in the visceral segment and may offer a reliable platform for future applications involving device delivery or target intervention. This intuitive technology is rapidly evolving and still requires technological refinements to extend current capabilities. Clinical studies involving head-to-head comparisons with conventional techniques are essential for evaluating its long-term safety and efficacy.

Purpose: To report the initial clinical use of a robotically steerable catheter during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) in order to assess this novel and innovative approach in a clinical setting., Technique: Following a series of in-vitro studies and procedure rehearsals using a pulsatile silicon aneurysm model, a 78-year-old man underwent robot-assisted EVAR of a 5.9-cm infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. During the standard procedure, a 14-F remotely steerable robotic catheter was used to successfully navigate through the aneurysm sac, cannulate the contralateral limb of a bifurcated stent-graft under fluoroscopic guidance, and place stiff wires using fine and controlled movements. The procedure was completed successfully. There were no postoperative complications, and computed tomographic angiography prior to discharge and at 3 months confirmed that the stent-graft remained in good position, with no evidence of an endoleak., Conclusion: EVAR using robotically-steerable catheters is feasible. This technology may simplify more complex procedures by increasing the accuracy of vessel cannulation and perhaps reduce procedure times and radiation exposure to the patient and operator.