Search

Tyre-road noise is the most important source of traffic noise in the mid-to-high speed range. The use of low noise road surfaces represents an ideal solution to mitigate traffic noise, because it directly affects the source, generating a widespread benefit for all the dwellings near the road and decreasing the number of people annoyed. More knowledge about long-term acoustic performance is required to promote the use of low noise road surfaces as mitigation action. In fact, as for a traditional road surface, the acoustic properties of low noise surfaces worsen over time: only by knowing the initial noise reduction and its time evolution, public administrations can design their application and related maintenance plans. In this work, an innovative approach was used to investigate and model acoustic ageing of some rubberized road surfaces surveyed for several years. This type of quiet pavements represents an efficient road surface technology in terms of traffic noise reduction. A new regression model was applied to estimate the acoustic ageing of the investigated pavements, considering the complex interacting system composed of three main elements: pavement type, traffic loads and climatic conditions.

The usage of low-noise road surface can be an important and effective noise mitigation action and, in many cases, it might represent the only viable solution. After the laying of a low-noise road surface, it is necessary to verify if the planned objectives have been actually obtained: the Close Proximity Method (CPX) could be a possible method to achieve this result. The current release of the ISO 11819 draft regarding CPX redirects to a future third part for all details about the reference tyre to be used, while the previous one gave indications on dimensions, kind of tread pattern and maintenance conditions. As well known, tyre dimensions and tread pattern are the main sources of variability of rolling noise. Even though many tyres available on the market comply with all ISO requirements, the choice of a brand or a model rather than another one could nevertheless influence results of measurements. In this work, results obtained in several measurement sessions, repeated using different tyres, are compared, aiming to analyse the influence of the tyre choice in assessing the acoustic performance of a low-noise road surface. Limitations and advantages of the CPX method in regards to the evaluation of the effectiveness of a noise mitigation action are reported, and new perspectives are suggested, in order to improve the relationship with the noise level reduction at the receiver.

Road traffic in urban contexts produces noise mainly by the interaction of tyres with pavement surface and, therefore, the use of low-noise surfaces represents the best solution since they aim to mitigate the source. Moreover, in urban contexts it is often the only viable solution, together with a careful traffic planning. The main challenge in their adoption as noise mitigation actions is to be able to forecast the acoustical performances that the new road surface will be able to offer. In the UE, the new Green Public Procurement requires experimental verification of noise performance compliance: the designer must declare the acoustical performance of the proposed low-noise pavement and, a few months after the laying, the actual performance of the road surface must be tested using the Close Proximity Method (CPX). Due to the importance of being able to forecast CPX levels, the present work reports a novel way to model CPX broadband levels of newly laid low-noise road surfaces using only data available to the designer before the laying or easily obtained through coring tests, such as grading curve, fractal dimension, asphalt binder content, air voids, voids in mineral aggregates. Two models were elaborated, using two different frequency separations for tyre/road noise. The first model separates low and high frequency contributions, while the second one also considers noise around 1 kHz separately, using a three-band model. Both models are capable of forecasting the acoustic performance of newly laid low-noise road surfaces, using different road mixture parameters at different frequency ranges. The three band model shows a lower RMSE.

The use of road surfaces with low noise emission characteristics is one of the actions mostly applied all over the world to decrease the number of road traffic noise annoyed people. Since many Italian roads are going to be paved with such surfaces, the LEOPOLDO project (funded by the Tuscany Region and the Italian Ministry of Transportation) was planned to check the efficacy in time of this action. Among all solutions, rubberized road surface is one of the most applied in USA, Canada, Europe and Asia. This paper describes results obtained by monitoring four rubberized surfaces one year after the laying and by evaluating the time stability of LEOPOLDO one by means of the Close Proximity method (CPX). All surfaces here analyzed are laid in real scenarios, so the actual efficacy of this action is evaluated. The results on the LEOPOLDO surface show spatial homogeneity, a good time stability and a significant noise emission reduction. Instead, analysis of the four rubberized surfaces shows variability in the results, probably due to the pavement installation quality, as supported by the data. Thus, the rubberized road surface looks to be a very efficient mitigation technology, providing the installation have been carried out with care and proficiency. 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license

The Close Proximity Index (CPX) measurement method is proposed in the ISO/DIS 11819-2:2011 and it aims to evaluate different road pavements with respect to their influence on traffic noise, under conditions when tyre/road noise dominates. In this paper, a modified CPX-based methodology is presented, in order to improve the usefulness of tyre/road noise measurement in the evaluation of acoustical performances of a road surface, in terms of both temporal and spatial stability and in terms of effectiveness of a mitigation action. In particular, the proposed methodology uses a finer spatial resolution and improves the speed-levels relationship knowledge. Moreover, data variability and uncertainty related to tyre/road noise measurement results are here investigated. This paper is conceived within LEOPOLDO project, developed in Tuscany with the aim to study the acoustical characteristics of six new experimental road surfaces, and the proposed methodology has been applied to some of them. The evaluation of the local possible acoustical inhomogeneities of test pavements and a three years long monitoring of the time evolution of their acoustical performances were required by the project. Finally, a new criterion is proposed to make more reliable comparisons (differential criterion) between different road surface types and to better evaluate the temporal evolution.

In almost all urban contexts and in many extra-urban conurbations, where road traffic is the main noise pollution source, the use of barriers is not allowed. In these cases, low-noise road surfaces are the most used mitigation action together with traffic flow reduction. Selecting the optimal surface is only the first problem that the public administration has to face. In the second place, it has to consider the issue of assessing the efficacy of the mitigation action. The purpose of the LEOPOLDO project was to improve the knowledge in the design and the characterization of low-noise road surfaces, producing guidelines helpful to the public administrations. Several experimental road surfaces were tested. Moreover, several measurement methods were implemented aiming to select those that are suitable for a correct assessment of the pavement performances laid as mitigation planning. In this paper, the experience gained in the LEOPOLDO project will be described, focusing on both the measurement methods adopted to assess the performance of a low-noise road surface and the criteria by which the experimental results have to be evaluated, presenting a comparison of the obtained results and their monitoring along time.