Search

Background and Objectives: In vitro evaluation of the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inhibitory potential is an important issue when predicting clinically relevant drug-drug interactions (DDIs). Located within all physiological barriers, including intestine, liver, and kidneys, P-gp plays a major role in the pharmacokinetics of various therapeutic classes. However, few data are available about DDIs involving renal transporters during the active tubular secretion of drugs. In this context, the present study was designed to investigate the application of the human renal cell line RPTEC/TERT1 to study drug interactions mediated by P-gp., Methods: The P-gp inhibitory potentials of a panel of drugs were first determined by measuring the intracellular accumulation of rhodamine 123 in RPTEC/TERT1 cells. Then four drugs were selected to assess the half-maximal inhibitor concentration (IC50) values by measuring the intracellular accumulation of two P-gp-substrate drugs, apixaban and rivaroxaban. Finally, according to the FDA guidelines, the [I 1 ]/IC50 ratio was calculated for each combination of drugs to assess the clinical relevance of the DDIs., Results: The data showed that drugs which are known P-gp inhibitors, including cyclosporin A, ketoconazole, and verapamil, caused great increases in rhodamine 123 retention, whereas noninhibitors did not affect the intracellular accumulation of the P-gp substrate. The determined IC50 values were in accordance with the inhibition profiles observed in the rhodamine 123 accumulation assays, confirming the reliability of the RPTEC/TERT1 model., Conclusions: Taken together, the data demonstrate the feasibility of the application of the RPTEC/TERT1 model for evaluating the P-gp inhibitory potentials of drugs and consequently predicting renal drug interactions., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Objective: To quantify the impact of activated charcoal (AC) on rivaroxaban exposure in healthy volunteers., Methods: This was an open-label study with an incomplete cross-over design of single-dose rivaroxaban (40 mg) administered alone or with AC in 12 healthy volunteers. The study comprised three treatment periods in randomised sequence, one with rivaroxaban administered alone and two with AC given at 2, 5 or 8 h post-dose. Rivaroxaban plasma concentration was measured in blood samples drawn at 16 time points. The pharmacokinetic model of rivaroxaban alone or with AC administration was built using a non-linear mixed-effect modelling approach., Results: The pharmacokinetic model was based on a one-compartment model with an absorption rate described by the sum of three inverse Gaussian densities to reproduce multiphasic and prolonged absorption. The inclusion in the model of each AC administration schedule significantly improved objective function value. AC reduced the area under the rivaroxaban concentration-time curve by 43% when administered 2 h post-dose, by 31% when administered 5 h post-dose and by 29% when administered 8 h post-dose. Based on the estimated pharmacokinetic model, simulations suggested that AC might have an impact even after 8 h post-dose., Conclusion: AC administration significantly reduces exposure to rivaroxaban even if AC is administered 8 h after rivaroxaban. These results suggest that AC could be used in rivaroxaban overdose and accidental ingestion to antagonise absorption. CLINICALTRIAL., Gov Registration No: NCT02657512.

Apixaban and rivaroxaban have first-line use for many patients needing anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE). The pharmacokinetics of these drugs in non-obese subjects have been extensively studied, and, while changes in pharmacokinetics have been documented in obese patients, data remain scarce for these anticoagulants. The aim of this study was to perform an external validation of published population pharmacokinetic (PPK) models of apixaban and rivaroxaban in a cohort of obese patients with VTE. A literature search was conducted in the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase databases following the PRISMA statement. External validation was performed using MonolixSuite software, using prediction-based and simulation-based diagnostics. An external validation dataset from the university hospitals of Brest and Rennes, France, included 116 apixaban pharmacokinetic samples from 69 patients and 121 rivaroxaban samples from 81 patients. Five PPK models of apixaban and 16 models of rivaroxaban were included, according to the inclusion criteria of the study. Two of the apixaban PPK models presented acceptable performances, whereas no rivaroxaban PPK model did. This study identified two published models of apixaban applicable to apixaban in obese patients with VTE. However, none of the rivaroxaban models evaluated were applicable. Dedicated studies appear necessary to elucidate rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) is being completely modified with the development of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban directly inhibit factor Xa, whereas dabigatran inhibits factor IIa. All these drugs are proposed orally, and share pharmacological similarities: fixed doses without any therapeutic drug monitoring, key role of the transporter proteins P-glycoprotein for all of them and metabolism mediated by CYP3A4 for the anti-Xa, short half-life with variable rate of renal elimination. More than 25 000 patients with acute VTE were included in phase-III studies. Rivaroxaban and apixaban challenged all the conventional therapy (parenteral heparins followed by anti-vitamin K antagonists) whereas edoxaban and dabigatran challenged only anti-vitamin K antagonists. All the DOACs met the non-inferiority efficacy endpoint (recurrent VTE during treatment), whereas the large non-inferiority margin was debated for dabigatran. However, they were associated with better safety and a decreased risk of major bleeding. According to indirect comparisons, there were no statistically significant differences between DOACs in terms of efficacy but some differences are not excluded in term of safety. Although DOACs allow for simplification of treatment in the majority of patients with acute VTE, their risk/benefit ratio is questioned in elderly patients, patients with mild-to-severe renal impairment, and in some clinical subgroups such as cancer or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Validated reversal strategies (potentially based on laboratory monitoring) are expected for patients with major bleeding, overdose or with a need for surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]