Search

Patients with immune-mediated kidney diseases are at increased risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The international rollout of COVID-19 vaccines has provided varying degrees of protection and enabled the understanding of vaccine efficacy and safety. The immune response to COVID-19 vaccines is lower in most patients with immune-mediated kidney diseases; either related to immunosuppression or comorbidities and complications caused by the underlying disease. Humoral vaccine response, measured by the presence of antibodies, is impaired or absent in patients receiving rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), higher doses of glucocorticoids and likely other immunosuppressants, such as cyclophosphamide. The timing between the use of these agents and administration of vaccines is associated with the level of immune response: with rituximab, vaccine response can only be expected once B cells start to recover and patients with transient discontinuation of MMF mount a humoral response more frequently. The emergence of new COVID-19 variants and waning of vaccine-induced immunity highlight the value of a booster dose and the need to develop mutant-proof vaccines. COVID-19 vaccines are safe, exhibiting a very low risk of de novo or relapsing immune-mediated kidney disease. Population-based studies will determine whether this is causal or coincidental. Such cases respond to standard management, including the use of immunosuppression. The Immunonephrology Working Group and European Vasculitis Society recommend that patients with immune-mediated kidney diseases follow national guidance on vaccination. Booster doses based on antibody measurements could be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: There is an urgent need to assess the impact of immunosuppressive therapies on the immunogenicity and efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.Methods: Serological and T-cell ELISpot assays were used to assess the response to first-dose and second-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccine (with either BNT162b2 mRNA or ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines) in 140 participants receiving immunosuppression for autoimmune rheumatic and glomerular diseases.Results: Following first-dose vaccine, 28.6% (34/119) of infection-naïve participants seroconverted and 26.0% (13/50) had detectable T-cell responses to SARS-CoV-2. Immune responses were augmented by second-dose vaccine, increasing seroconversion and T-cell response rates to 59.3% (54/91) and 82.6% (38/46), respectively. B-cell depletion at the time of vaccination was associated with failure to seroconvert, and tacrolimus therapy was associated with diminished T-cell responses. Reassuringly, only 8.7% of infection-naïve patients had neither antibody nor T-cell responses detected following second-dose vaccine. In patients with evidence of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection (19/140), all mounted high-titre antibody responses after first-dose vaccine, regardless of immunosuppressive therapy.Conclusion: SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are immunogenic in patients receiving immunosuppression, when assessed by a combination of serology and cell-based assays, although the response is impaired compared with healthy individuals. B-cell depletion following rituximab impairs serological responses, but T-cell responses are preserved in this group. We suggest that repeat vaccine doses for serological non-responders should be investigated as means to induce more robust immunological response. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article describes the case of diffuse crescentic glomerulonephritis (GN) with preserved renal function in a 22-year-old South Asian man. Topics discussed include the symptoms presented by the patient, namely, fever, fatigue, arthralgia, myalgia and epistaxis, recommendation of induction immunosuppressive treatment for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated GN, and importance of renal biopsy in the case.

The authors reflect on the issues on the use of rituximab as maintenance treatment for antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV). Other topics include the possible risk factors for relapse like polyangiitis disease, PR3-ANCA positivity, and granulomatosis, the effects of azathioprine (AZA) as treatment, and the study which created risk prediction models for future relapse or infection in AAV.

Background Current guidelines advise that rituximab or cyclophosphamide should be used for the treatment of organ-threatening disease in anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV), although few studies have examined the efficacy and safety of these agents in combination. Methods We conducted a single-centre cohort study of 66 patients treated with a combination of oral corticosteroids, rituximab and low-dose pulsed intravenous cyclophosphamide followed by a maintenance regimen of azathioprine and tapered steroid for the treatment of biopsy-proven renal involvement in AAV. Patients were followed for a median of 56 months. Case–control analysis with 198 propensity-matched cases from European Vasculitis Study Group (EUVAS) trials compared long-term differences in relapse-free, renal and patient survival. Results At entry, the median Birmingham Vasculitis Activity Score (BVAS) was 19 and estimated glomerular filtration rate was 25 mL/min. Cumulative doses of rituximab, cyclophosphamide and corticosteroids were 2, 3 and 4.2 g, respectively, at 6 months. A total of 94% of patients achieved disease remission by 6 months (BVAS < 0) and patient and renal survival were 84 and 95%, respectively, at 5 years. A total of 84% achieved ANCA-negative status and 57% remained B cell deplete at 2 years, which was associated with low rates of major relapse (15% at 5 years). The serious infection rate during long-term follow-up was 1.24 per 10 patient-years. Treatment with this regimen was associated with a reduced risk of death {hazard ratio [HR] 0.29 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.125–0.675], P = 0.004}, progression to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) [HR 0.20 (95% CI 0.06–0.65), P = 0.007] and relapse [HR 0.49 (95% CI 0.25–0.97), P = 0.04] compared with propensity-matched patients enrolled in EUVAS trials. Conclusions This regimen is potentially superior to current standards of care, and controlled studies are warranted to establish the utility of combination drug approaches in the treatment of AAV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. B cell depletion, most commonly with rituximab, is an evolving therapeutic approach in SLE. Infusion reactions after rituximab are common, and may prevent re-treatment in patients who previously demonstrated beneficial response. We have used ofatumumab, a fully humanized anti-CD20 mAb, as an alternative B cell-depleting agent in patients with SLE who are rituximab-intolerant due to severe infusion reactions. Methods. A single-centre retrospective case series of 16 patients were treated with ofatumumab for SLE between 2012 and 2015. Results. Ofatumumab infusion was well tolerated in 14/16 patients, in whom the median age was 34 (range 19-55) and the median duration of SLE 9.2 years (0.6-28.5). The cohort was heavily pre-treated, with 50% having prior CYC exposure, and a median cumulative dose of prior rituximab 4 g (1-6). Twelve patients were treated for LN, one for extra-renal flare and one for remission maintenance. B cell-depletion was achieved in 12/14 patients, with comparable reconstitution kinetics to a previous cohort treated with rituximab at our centre, and was associated with improvements in serological markers of disease activity, including ANA, anti-dsDNA antibody and complement levels. Half of the patients with LN achieved renal remission by 6 months. Progressive disease that was unresponsive to augmented immunosuppression with CYC was seen in five patients. During long-term follow-up (median 28 months), five grade III infections were reported, and there were no malignancies or deaths. Conclusion. In this pre-treated cohort with long-standing SLE, ofatumumab was a well-tolerated, safe and effective alternative to rituximab for B cell-depletion therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The authors reply to a comment on a study by Pepper et al that investigated the use of glucocorticoid (GC)-free maintenance regimen for anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV). They claim that the degree of severity of AAV patients in the present study are no different from previous studies reported. Therefore, the authors do not agree that the reason for the good outcome despite GC avoidance was due to lesser degree of disease severity.

Purpose To evaluate the long-term outcomes of rituximab (RTX) treatment in patients with ocular granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) with localized or generalized disease. Design Retrospective cohort. Participants Thirty-seven patients with ocular GPA receiving RTX in a multidisciplinary vasculitis clinic between 2004 and 2013. Methods A total of 100 patients who received a course of RTX were identified, and notes were reviewed. Baseline demographic details, clinical characteristics (including organ involvement), drugs used, and outcome measures were recorded. Main Outcome Measures The percentage in remission (inactive disease with prednisolone ≤7.5 mg with or without maintenance treatment) at 6 months, time to remission, percentage relapsing, side effects, B-cell count, antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody titers, induction, and maintenance regimens. Results The median follow-up time after the first RTX course was 36.5 months. Twenty patients had scleritis, and 17 patients had orbital disease; 86% achieved remission at 6 months. The percentage in remission versus partial remission was not statistically significant between patients with scleritis and patients with orbital disease (85% vs. 15% with scleritis and 82% vs. 18% with orbital disease; P = 1.00). The percentage relapsing was not statistically significant ( P = 0.33) between scleritis (60%) and orbital disease (41%). Localized disease (ocular ± ear-nose-throat/lung) was observed in 57%, and generalized disease (ocular plus other organs) was observed in 43%, the former having a median duration of disease of 40 months. There was no statistically significant difference ( P = 0.37) in the percentage in remission between localized and generalized ocular disease. Relapses occurred in 51%, with localized disease being a significant risk factor for relapse. Fifty percent of patients with generalized disease versus none with localized disease received cyclophosphamide (CYP) as part of the induction regimen. Patients who received CYP during induction had significantly ( P = 0.027) lower ratios of baseline 12-month proteinase 3 titers than patients who did not have CYP. Infections were observed in 16% of patients, with 8% requiring hospital admission. Conclusions Our long-term data suggest that RTX is effective for inducing disease remission in localized and generalized ocular GPA. Localized disease is a significant risk factor for relapse, which may be related to less use of CYP in the induction regimen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]