Search

Objective: To evaluate the characteristics of patients with autoimmune disease with hypogammaglobulinemia following rituximab (RTX) and describe their long-term outcomes, including those who commenced immunoglobulin replacement therapy., Methods: Patients received RTX for autoimmune disease between 2003 and 2012 with immunoglobulin G (IgG) <7g/L were included in this retrospective series. Hypogammaglobulinemia was classified by nadir IgG subgroups of 5 to <7g/L (mild), 3 to <5g/L (moderate) and <3g/L (severe). Characteristics of patients were compared across subgroups and examined for factors associated with greater likelihood of long term hypogammaglobulinemia or immunoglobulin replacement., Results: 142 patients were included; 101 (71%) had anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody (ANCA) associated vasculitis (AAV), 18 (13%) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and 23 (16%) other conditions. Mean follow-up was 97.2 months from first RTX. Hypogammaglobulinemia continued to be identified during long-term follow-up. Median time to IgG <5g/L was 22.5 months. Greater likelihood of moderate hypogammaglobulinemia (IgG <5g/L) and/or use of immunoglobulin replacement therapy at 60 months was observed in patients with prior cyclophosphamide exposure (odds ratio (OR) 3.60 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 - 12.53], glucocorticoid use at 12 months [OR 7.48 (95% CI 1.28 - 43.55], lower nadir IgG within 12 months of RTX commencement [OR 0.68 (95% CI 0.51 - 0.90)] and female sex [OR 8.57 (95% CI 2.07 - 35.43)]. Immunoglobulin replacement was commenced in 29/142 (20%) and associated with reduction in infection rates, but not severe infection rates., Conclusion: Hypogammaglobulinemia continues to occur in long-term follow-up post-RTX. In patients with recurrent infections, immunoglobulin replacement reduced rates of non-severe infections., Competing Interests: JT reports grants from Arthritis Australia (funded by Australian Rheumatology Association and Roche) and National Health and Medical Research Council during the conduct of this study. DK reports other support from CSL Behring, Shire/Takeda, Charities Fund Addenbrookes Hospital Cambridge and Grifols outside the submitted work, and membership of Immunoglobulin Demand Management Assessment Panel for National Health Service UK, membership of Clinical Reference Group for Immunology and Allergy National Health Service, England since 2019. AM reports personal fees and other support from CSL Behring, and other support from Takeda outside submitted work. DJ reports grants from Roche/Genentech during the conduct of the study, personal fees from Astra-Zeneca, Aurinia, and Boehringer, grants and personal fees from Chemocentryx, grants and personal fees from GSK, and grants from Sanofi outside the submitted work. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The handling editor declared a past co-authorship with one of the authors, DJ., (Copyright © 2021 Tieu, Smith, Gopaluni, Kumararatne, McClure, Manson, Houghton and Jayne.)

Objectives: Following a maintenance course of rituximab (RTX) for ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV), relapses occur on cessation of therapy, and further dosing is considered. This study aimed to develop relapse and infection risk prediction models to help guide decision making regarding extended RTX maintenance therapy., Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of AAV who received 4-8 grams of RTX as maintenance treatment between 2002 and 2018 were included. Both induction and maintenance doses were included; most patients received standard departmental protocol consisting of 2× 1000 mg 2 weeks apart, followed by 1000 mg every 6 months for 2 years. Patients who continued on repeat RTX dosing long-term were excluded. Separate risk prediction models were derived for the outcomes of relapse and infection., Results: A total of 147 patients were included in this study with a median follow-up of 63 months [interquartile range (IQR): 34-93]. Relapse: At time of last RTX, the model comprised seven predictors, with a corresponding C-index of 0.54. Discrimination between individuals using this model was not possible; however, discrimination could be achieved by grouping patients into low- and high-risk groups. When the model was applied 12 months post last RTX, the ability to discriminate relapse risk between individuals improved (C-index 0.65), and once again, clear discrimination was observed between patients from low- and high-risk groups. Infection: At time of last RTX, five predictors were retained in the model. The C-index was 0.64 allowing discrimination between low and high risk of infection groups. At 12 months post RTX, the C-index for the model was 0.63. Again, clear separation of patients from two risk groups was observed., Conclusion: While our models had insufficient power to discriminate risk between individual patients they were able to assign patients into risk groups for both relapse and infection. The ability to identify risk groups may help in decisions regarding the potential benefit of ongoing RTX treatment. However, we caution the use of these prediction models until prospective multi-centre validation studies have been performed., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Objective: We aimed to assess risk factors for the development of severe infection in patients with antineutrophil cytoplasm antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) receiving rituximab., Methods: 192 patients with AAV were identified. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for severe infection following rituximab. Severe infections were classified as grade ≥3 as proposed by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V.4.0., Results: 95 severe infections were recorded in 49 (25.52%) patients, corresponding to an event rate of 26.06 per 100 person-years. The prophylactic use of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was associated with a lower frequency of severe infections (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.69), while older age (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.05), endobronchial involvement (HR 2.21, 95% CI 1.14 to 4.26), presence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 6.30, 95% CI 1.08 to 36.75) and previous alemtuzumab use (HR 3.97, 95% CI 1.50 to 10.54) increased the risk. When analysis was restricted to respiratory tract infections (66.3% of all infections), endobronchial involvement (HR 4.27, 95% CI 1.81 to 10.06), severe bronchiectasis (HR 6.14, 95% CI 1.18 to 31.91), higher neutrophil count (HR 1.19, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.33) and major relapse (HR 3.07, 95% CI 1.30 to 7.23) as indication for rituximab use conferred a higher risk, while refractory disease (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.90) as indication had a lower frequency of severe infections., Conclusions: We found severe infections in one quarter of patients with AAV receiving rituximab. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole prophylaxis reduced the risk, while especially bronchiectasis and endobronchial involvement are risk factors for severe respiratory infections., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AK has received travel support from Roche/Genentech. DRWJ has received research grants and consulting fees from Roche/Genentech and Terumo BCT and is supported by the Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

Rituximab (RTX), a chimeric, monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, is increasingly used in immune-mediated renal diseases. While licensed in the induction treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis, it represents one of the most commonly prescribed off-label drugs. Much of the information regarding its safety has been drawn from experience in hematology and rheumatology. Ample evidence illustrates the safety of RTX, however, rare but serious adverse events have emerged that include progressive multifocal leucoencephalopathy and hepatitis B reactivation. Moderate to severe hypogammaglobulinemia and late-onset neutropenia following RTX therapy confer an increased infectious risk and factors predicting these side effects (i.e. a genetic basis) need to be identified. Nephrologists initiating RTX need to bear in mind that long-term risks and optimal dosing for many renal indications remain unclear. Special considerations must be given when RTX is used in women of childbearing age. We summarize practical aspects concerning the use of RTX. This review will provide nephrologists with information to guide their use of RTX alerting them to safety risks and the need for patient counselling., (Crown Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Rituximab is effective as therapy for induction of remission in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV). However, the effect of rituximab is not sustained, and subsequent relapse rates are high, especially in patients with a history of relapse. There is a need to identify whether maintenance therapy with rituximab is superior to the current standard of azathioprine or methotrexate for prevention of relapse following induction with rituximab., Methods/design: RITAZAREM is an international, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial designed to demonstrate the superiority of repeated doses of intravenous rituximab compared to daily orally administered azathioprine as a relapse prevention strategy in patients with AAV with relapsing disease who undergo induction of remission with rituximab. Patients with AAV will be recruited at the time of relapse and will receive rituximab and glucocorticoid induction therapy. If the disease is controlled by 4 months, patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive rituximab (1000 mg every 4 months for five doses) or azathioprine (2 mg/kg/day) as maintenance therapy. Patients will be followed for a minimum of 36 months. The primary outcome is the time to disease relapse. It is estimated that 190 patients will need to be recruited to ensure that at least 160 are randomized., Discussion: The RITAZAREM trial will provide the largest trial dataset for the use of rituximab as remission-induction therapy for patients with AAV comparing two remission-maintenance strategies following induction with rituximab, and explore whether prolonged B-cell depletion leads to sustained treatment-free remissions after discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01697267 . Registered on 31 August 2012.

The anti-CD20 B cell depleting monoclonal antibody rituximab is being used increasingly for autoimmune diseases, including patients with refractory disease with extensive prior exposure to immunosuppressive treatments. Rituximab, in this context, may be associated with increased risk of adverse effects, in particular hypogammaglobulinemia which predisposes to recurrent infections necessitating Immunoglobulin G replacement. Outcome data following Immunoglobulin G replacement after rituximab in patients with autoimmune disease are limited. We conducted a retrospective study in a tertiary referral lupus and vasculitis clinic of 288 patients who received rituximab. Clinical details of patients prescribed IgG replacement therapy following rituximab treatment were reviewed. We identified 12 patients with autoimmune disease, 10/12 with systemic vasculitis, received IgG replacement for the treatment of recurrent infections in the context of persistent moderate or severe hypogammaglobulinemia following rituximab. We observed a range of ages (16-67 years), rituximab dosages (2-15.8 g), previous immunosuppression (median 3.5 non-glucocorticoid agents) and duration of disease (2-228 months). Six continued to receive rituximab alongside IgG replacement therapy to maintain disease control. IgG replacement appeared to decrease the incidence and severity of infections, and recovery of IgG concentrations allowed cessation of IgG replacement in two patients after 4 and 7.5 years of treatment. IgG monitoring is useful for patients receiving rituximab. IgG replacement for sustained hypogammaglobulinemia with recurrent infections appeared to be useful in this series. The IgG replacement course is prolonged in most patients, but IgG recovery is reported., (Crown Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Rituximab is a B cell depleting monoclonal antibody used to treat lymphoma and autoimmune disease. Hypogammaglobulinemia has occurred after rituximab for lymphoma and rheumatoid arthritis but data are scarce for other autoimmune indications. This study describes the incidence and severity of hypogammaglobulinemia in patients receiving rituximab for small vessel vasculitis and other multi-system autoimmune diseases. Predictors for and clinical outcomes of hypogammaglobulinemia were explored. We conducted a retrospective study in a tertiary referral specialist clinic. The severity of hypogammaglobulinemia was categorized by the nadir serum IgG concentration measured during clinical care. We identified 288 patients who received rituximab; 243 were eligible for inclusion with median follow up of 42 months. 26% were IgG hypogammaglobulinemic at the time that rituximab was initiated and 56% had IgG hypogammaglobulinemia during follow-up (5-6.9 g/L in 30%, 3-4.9 g/L in 22% and <3 g/L in 4%); IgM ≤0.3 g/L in 58%. The nadir IgG was non-sustained in 50% of cases with moderate/severe hypogammaglobulinemia. A weak association was noted between prior cyclophosphamide exposure and nadir IgG concentration, but not cumulative rituximab dose. IgG concentrations prior to and at the time of rituximab correlated with the nadir IgG post rituximab. IgG replacement was initiated because of recurrent infection in 12 (4.2%) patients and a lower IgG increased the odds ratio of receiving IgG replacement. Rituximab is associated with an increased risk of hypogammaglobulinemia but recovery of IgG level can occur. IgG monitoring may be useful for patients receiving rituximab., (Crown Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background/aims: Rituximab and glucocorticoids are a non-inferior alternative to cyclophosphamide and glucocorticoid therapy for induction of remission in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) associated vasculitis (AAV) patients with moderate renal disease. The efficacy and safety of this approach in patients with severe renal impairment are unknown. We report the outcomes and safety profile of rituximab and glucocorticoid therapy for induction of remission in patients with AAV and ANCA-negative vasculitis presenting with severe renal disease., Methods: A multicenter, retrospective, cohort study was conducted between 2005 and 2014. Patients with new or relapsing disease with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of ≤20 ml/min/1.73 m(2) treated with rituximab and glucocorticoid induction with or without plasmapheresis were included. Fourteen patients met the inclusion criteria. The primary outcomes were rate of remission and dialysis independence at 6 months. The secondary outcomes were eGFR at 6 months, end-stage renal disease (ESRD), survival rates and adverse events., Results: All patients were Caucasian, and 57% were male. The mean eGFR was 12 ml/min/1.73 m(2) at diagnosis. All patients achieved remission with a median time to remission of 55 days. Seven patients required dialysis at presentation of which 5 patients recovered renal function and discontinued dialysis by 6-month follow-up. The mean eGFR for the 11 patients without ESRD who completed 6-month follow-up was 33 ml/min/1.73 m(2). Four patients ultimately developed ESRD, and one died during the follow-up period., Conclusion: Patients with AAV and severe renal disease achieve high rates of remission and dialysis independence when treated with rituximab and glucocorticoids without cyclophosphamide., (© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objectives Rituximab is used for remission induction and the prevention of relapse in anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV). This study evaluated the incidence of safety events and compared time to first serious adverse event (SAE) between a rituximab cohort and a cohort treated with non-rituximab therapies in a real-life setting. Methods Rituximab surveillance study in vasculitis was a retrospective observational study of patients with AAV who received rituximab (MabThera) or other treatments between 2003 and 2017 at a specialist vasculitis clinic. The primary endpoint was time to first SAE. Results 392 patients were enrolled: 247 in the rituximab and 145 in the control cohorts with a total follow up of 2217 person-years (mean study duration 5.7 years). Mean age was 61 years, 77% had granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA). There were differences in baseline characteristics (disease duration and prior immunosuppressive use) between groups. 134/247 patients (54%) in the rituximab and 58/145 (40%) of controls experienced at least one SAE. Time to first SAE was shorter in the rituximab group (hazard ratio (HR) 1.55, 95% CI 1.07–2.26, P  = 0.022). Predictors of first SAE were higher vasculitis damage index and the presence of chronic pulmonary or kidney disease. The risk of serious infection was higher in the rituximab group (relative risk (RR) 2.12, 95% CI 1.31–3.43). Conclusion Over 40% of patients with AAV experienced at least one SAE. Although shorter time to first SAE and higher risk of infection were observed in the rituximab group, baseline imbalances necessitate a careful interpretation of these results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with immune-mediated kidney diseases are at increased risk of severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). The international rollout of COVID-19 vaccines has provided varying degrees of protection and enabled the understanding of vaccine efficacy and safety. The immune response to COVID-19 vaccines is lower in most patients with immune-mediated kidney diseases; either related to immunosuppression or comorbidities and complications caused by the underlying disease. Humoral vaccine response, measured by the presence of antibodies, is impaired or absent in patients receiving rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), higher doses of glucocorticoids and likely other immunosuppressants, such as cyclophosphamide. The timing between the use of these agents and administration of vaccines is associated with the level of immune response: with rituximab, vaccine response can only be expected once B cells start to recover and patients with transient discontinuation of MMF mount a humoral response more frequently. The emergence of new COVID-19 variants and waning of vaccine-induced immunity highlight the value of a booster dose and the need to develop mutant-proof vaccines. COVID-19 vaccines are safe, exhibiting a very low risk of de novo or relapsing immune-mediated kidney disease. Population-based studies will determine whether this is causal or coincidental. Such cases respond to standard management, including the use of immunosuppression. The Immunonephrology Working Group and European Vasculitis Society recommend that patients with immune-mediated kidney diseases follow national guidance on vaccination. Booster doses based on antibody measurements could be considered. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article describes the case of refractory antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis in a 41-year-old White male. Topics discussed include the medical history of the patient such as epistaxis, breathlessness, arthralgia, skin blisters, tingling of the left arm and weight loss, use of warfarin to address his cardiac thrombus and optimization of his cardiac secondary prevention therapy, and maintenance medicine recommended for the patient such as oral prednisolone.

Rituximab has enriched our armamentarium in the treatment of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)- associated vasculitis. Two randomised controlled trials have shown that rituximab is non-inferior compared with cyclophosphamide followed by azathioprine for the induction of remission. The newly diagnosed patients in the Rituximab in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis (RAVE) and Rituximab Versus Cyclophosphamide in ANCA-Associated Vasculitis (RITUXVAS) trials had a numerically higher response rate in the cyclophosphamide/azathioprine arm, and the number of such patients treated with rituximab numbered <90.We are arguing that in newly diagnosed patients, the evidence for rituximab requires further confirmation and the length of experience with a cyclophosphamide-based induction therapy supports it continuing as the preferred first choice for induction. Also, there is an absence of information regarding rituximab as 'sole' remission induction along with steroids in patients with advanced renal presentations or lung haemorrhage. Reported side effects were similar in both trials; however, the number of participants with at least one serious adverse event following rituximab induction treatment was numerically higher in the RAVE trial. In addition, hypogammaglobulinaemia with the need of substitution in some cases and late-onset neutropaenia are complications not seen with cyclophosphamide. Over the longer term it is unclear what relapse prevention strategy should be employed after rituximab, and there was a trend to a higher relapse risk after rituximab in the RITUXVAS trial at 2 years. Further health economic studies are required to understand all the costs associated with rituximab. In the context of concomitant underlying infectious complications, in terms of fertility concerns, especially in young patients, and when malignancy is underlying we would recommend the use of rituximab as first-line therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective. ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) is characterized by a chronic relapsing course. Rituximab (RTX) is an effective maintenance treatment; however, the long-term outcomes after its discontinuation are unclear. The aim of this study was to explore the long-term outcomes of AAV patients treated with repeatdose RTX maintenance therapy. Methods. AAV patients receiving a RTX treatment protocol consisting of an induction and maintenance phase were included. For initial remission induction, RTX was dosed at 1 g every 2 weeks or 375 mg/m2 weekly for 4 consecutive weeks and for remission maintenance at 1 g every 6 months for 24 months. At the first RTX administration, ongoing immunosuppressives were withdrawn. Results. Sixty-nine patients were identified, 67 of whom were failing other therapies. Nine relapsed during the RTX treatment protocol; however, all 69 were in remission at the end of the maintenance phase on a median prednisolone dose of 2.5 mg/day and 9% were receiving additional immunosuppression. During subsequent observation, 28 patients relapsed a median of 34.4 months after the last RTX infusion. Risk factors for relapse were PR3-associated disease (P = 0.039), B cell return within 12 months of the last RTX infusion (P = 0.0038) and switch from ANCA negativity to positivity (P = 0.0046). Two patients died and two developed severe hypogammaglobulinaemia. Conclusion. This study supports the efficacy and safety of a fixed-interval RTX maintenance regimen in relapsing/refractory AAV. Relapses after discontinuation of maintenance therapy did occur, but at a lower rate than after a single RTX induction course. PR3-associated disease, the switch from ANCA negative to positive and the return of B cells within 12 months of the last RTX administration were risk factors for further relapse. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a subgrouping of autoimmune disorders characterized by a chronic relapsing course. Induction therapy is usually effective, but 70% of patients will relapse and 20% develop refractory disease. In the relapsing and refractory subgroups, treatment is complicated by the cumulative exposure to toxic drugs that contribute to poor long-term outcomes. The anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab (RTX) depletes B cells, and the success of this targeted therapy has contributed to the evidence supporting a central role for B cells in AAV pathogenesis. Initial proof of RTX effectiveness originated from small, prospective trials and retrospective surveys conducted in AAV patients with relapsing and refractory disease; high remission rates permitted the reduction of glucocorticoids (GCS) doses and withdrawal of immunosuppressives. There has been controversy over the effectiveness of RTX in patients with predominantly granulomatous manifestations, where response rates have varied between studies, in part due to different RTX dosing regimens. These studies were followed by comparison of RTX against cyclophosphamide (CYC) for remission induction of new or relapsing AAV in two randomized trials, which led to the licensing of RTX for this indication. Subsequent attention has been turned to the use of RTX as a relapse prevention agent, to the potential for GCS sparing and to RTX-associated toxicity. We will discuss the impact that the results of RTX clinical trials have had on the management of AAV patients. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background Rituximab is a B cell depleting anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody. CD20 is not expressed on mature plasma cells and accordingly rituximab does not have immediate effects on immunoglobulin levels. However, after rituximab some patients develop hypogammaglobulinaemia. Methods We performed a single centre retrospective review of 177 patients with multisystem autoimmune disease receiving rituximab between 2002 and 2010. The incidence, severity and complications of hypogammaglobulinaemia were investigated. Results Median rituximab dose was 6 g (1-20.2) and total follow-up was 8012 patient-months. At first rituximab, the proportion of patients with IgG <6 g/L was 13% and remained stable at 17% at 24 months and 14% at 60 months. Following rituximab, 61/177 patients (34%) had IgG <6 g/L for at least three consecutive months, of whom 7/177 (4%) had IgG <3 g/L. Low immunoglobulin levels were associated with higher glucocorticoid doses during follow up and there was a trend for median IgG levels to fall after = 6 g rituximab. 45/115 (39%) with IgG ≥6 g/L versus 26/62 (42%) with IgG <6 g/L experienced severe infections (p = 0.750). 6/177 patients (3%) received intravenous immunoglobulin replacement therapy, all with IgG <5 g/L and recurrent infection. Conclusions In multi-system autoimmune disease, prior cyclophosphamide exposure and glucocorticoid therapy but not cumulative rituximab dose was associated with an increased incidence of hypogammaglobulinaemia. Severe infections were common but were not associated with immunoglobulin levels. Repeat dose rituximab therapy appears safe with judicious monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective Rituximab is effective induction therapy in refractory or relapsing antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV). However, further relapse is common, and maintenance strategies are required. The aim of this study was to reduce relapse rates using a fixed-interval rituximab re-treatment protocol. Methods Retrospective, standardized collection of data from sequential patients receiving rituximab for refractory or relapsing AAV at a single center was studied. Group A patients (n = 28) received rituximab induction therapy (4 infusions of 375 mg/m2 or 2 infusions 1 gm) and further rituximab at the time of subsequent relapse. Group B patients (n = 45) received routine rituximab re-treatment for 2 years: 2 doses of 1 gm each for remission induction, then 1 gm every 6 months (total of 6 gm). Group C patients (n = 19) comprised patients in group A who subsequently relapsed and began routine re-treatment for 2 years. Results Response (complete/partial remission) occurred in 26 of the 28 patients (93%) in group A, 43 of the 45 patients (96%) in group B, and 18 of the 19 patients (95%) in group C. At 2 years, relapses had occurred in 19 of 26 patients (73%) in group A, 5 of 43 (12%) in group B ( P < 0.001), and 2 of 18 (11%) in group C ( P < 0.001). At the last followup (median of 44 months), relapses had occurred in 85% of those in group A (22 of 26), 26% of those in group B (11 of 43; P < 0.001), and 56% of those in group C (10 of 18; P = 0.001). Glucocorticoid dosages were decreased and immunosuppression therapy was withdrawn in the majority of patients. Routine rituximab re-treatment was well tolerated, and no new safety issues were identified. Conclusion Two-year, fixed-interval rituximab re-treatment was associated with a reduction in relapse rates during the re-treatment period and a more prolonged period of remission during subsequent followup. In the absence of biomarkers that accurately predict relapse, routine rituximab re-treatment may be an effective strategy for remission maintenance in patients with refractory and relapsing AAV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease that is clinically heterogeneous and affects multiple organs. Lupus nephritis is the most frequent severe manifestation of SLE. Conventional immunosuppressive therapy has increased the life expectancy of patients diagnosed with lupus nephritis, but only 70-80% of patients respond to this treatment and its adverse effects are considerable. B cells are central to the pathogenesis of SLE and are, therefore, an attractive therapeutic target. B-cell depletion has been used successfully to treat other autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis, and many case reports and small nonrandomized trials of B-cell-depleting agents in patients with lupus nephritis have reported positive results. By contrast, two large placebo-controlled trials designed to investigate the efficacy of the B-cell-depleting agents rituximab and ocrelizumab as a treatment for lupus nephritis, failed to meet their primary efficacy end points (LUNAR and BELONG, respectively). This Review discusses the current evidence on the use of B-cell depletion in the treatment of lupus nephritis, which is derived from case studies and clinical trials including a total of over 800 patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives. To perform a literature review and develop recommendations for the use of rituximab in ANCA-associated vasculitis.Methods. A committee of experts (five rheumatologists, five nephrologists and one paediatrician) conducted a modified Delphi exercise to identify five topics for a systematic literature search. The evidence was then reviewed, categorized according to international criteria and assimilated to form five recommendations statements and a research agenda.Results. Forty-three studies met the review criteria. These included two randomized controlled trials and a predominance of small, uncontrolled series. In refractory ANCA-associated vasculitis, remission rates of >80% are obtained with rituximab. In newly diagnosed disease, rituximab is at least as effective as conventional therapy. Fifteen recommendations were made. Their strength was restricted by the low quality of the evidence. Six areas for future research were identified.Conclusion. On the basis of the available evidence and expert consensus, recommendations have been made for the use of rituximab as a treatment of ANCA-associated vasculitis. Further questions, in particular regarding long-term outcomes, remain to be explored. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Background A 40-year-old man was referred to a specialist vasculitis center 4 years after being diagnosed with Wegener's granulomatosis. At the time of diagnosis he had presented with skin, ear, nose and throat involvement, pulmonary hemorrhage, and microscopic hematuria. Remission was achieved with plasma exchange and with daily oral prednisolone and cyclophosphamide. The patient was switched to maintenance treatment with azathioprine and prednisolone but suffered a relapse shortly afterwards. Further treatment with cyclophosphamide achieved a second remission, but the patient relapsed again despite remission-maintaining treatment with mycophenolate mofetil. Investigations Physical examination, laboratory testing, serological testing, culture of eye swabs and sputum, chest X-ray, chest CT scan, head M RI scan, bronchoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage, and consultation with ophthalmological and otorhinolaryngological specialists. Diagnosis Refractory Wegener's granulomatosis with involvement of the eyes, upper and lower respiratory tracts, and kidneys. Management Disease activity was controlled following treatment with deoxyspergualin and oral steroids in addition to aggressive management of intercurrent infections with repeated courses of oral and intravenous antibiotics. Relapses that occurred when deoxyspergualin was discontinued were treated with repeated courses of deoxyspergualin or with pulsed intravenous cyclophosphamide. Remission was achieved with rituximab. Pulmonary disease was closely monitored with repeated bronchoscopy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody rituximab (RTX) depletes B cells in the treatment of lymphoma and autoimmune disease, and contributes to alloantibody reduction in transplantation across immunologic barriers. The effects of RTX on T cells are less well described. T-follicular helper (Tfh) cells provide growth and differentiation signals to germinal center (GC) B cells to support antibody production, and suppressive T-follicular regulatory (Tfr) cells regulate this response. In mice, both Tfh and Tfr are absolutely dependent on B cells for their formation and on the GCfor their maintenance. In this study, we demonstrate that RTX treatment results in a lack of GC B cells in human lymph nodes without affecting the Tfh or Tfr cell populations. These data demonstrate that human Tfh and Tfr do not require an ongoing GC response for their maintenance. The persistence of Tfh and Tfr following RTX treatment may permit rapid reconstitution of the pathological GC response once the B-cell pool begins to recover. Strategies for maintaining remission after RTX therapy will need to take this persistence of Tfh into account. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]