Search

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon (IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients with severe immunodeficiency in a clinical cohort. BACKGROUND. A total of 542 HIV-infected patients receiving treatment with pegylated IFN plus RBV from June 2001 through April 2007 were included in this study. The outcome variables were sustained virologic response (SVR) rate and the emergence of AIDS-defining events during HCV infection therapy. SVR rates among patients with a CD4 cell count 250 cells/mm(3). The association between SVR and potential predictors was analyzed., Results: Ten (26%) of 39 individuals with a baseline CD4 cell count 250 cells/mm(3) and 198 (39%) of 503 with baseline CD4 cell counts >or=250 CD4 cells/mm(3) achieved SVR (P = .09). In a nested case-control study with populations matched at a 1:2 ratio, the SVR rate was 26% in the CD4 cell count 250 cells/mm(3) group and 32% in the CD4 cell count >250 cells/mm(3) group (P = .5). Baseline CD4 cell count (250 cells/mm(3) vs >250 cells/mm(3)) was not associated with SVR in the multivariate analysis. Two (5%) individuals in the CD4 cell count 250 cells/mm(3) group experienced opportunistic events during follow-up. In the CD4 cell count 250 cells/mm(3) group, severe hematological toxicity and pegylated IFN or RBV dosage reductions occurred in 16 (41%) and 12 (31%) patients, respectively. In the CD4 cell count >250 cells/mm(3) group, severe hematological toxicity and pegylated IFN or RBV dosage reductions occurred in 29% (P = .1) and 20% (P = .1) of patients, respectively., Conclusions: The efficacy of pegylated IFN plus RBV in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients with advanced immunosuppression is substantial and not significantly different to that observed in the overall coinfected population. HCV therapy is generally safe in the population of coinfected patients with advanced immunosuppression.

Background/aims: To evaluate the possible influence of baseline insulin resistance in sustained virological response., Methods: One hundred and fifty-five consecutive individuals from a multicentric cohort of HIV/HCV co-infected patients who underwent therapy with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin were included. The main outcome variable was sustained virological response, defined as undetectable plasma HCV RNA at week 24 after the end of the therapy. Insulin resistance was determined using the HOMA method., Results: Sustained virological response was achieved in 55 (36%) patients. Forty-two (38%) patients with a HOMA lower than 4 developed sustained virological response vs 13 (29%) of those with a HOMA above 4 (p=0.27). Analyses restricted to patients harbouring genotype 1 or 4 showed similar rates of sustained virological response among patients with a HOMA below and above 4 [19 (27%) vs 7 (24%); p=0.8]. In the multivariate analysis, genotype 3 [AOR 9.26; 95% CI 3.03-28.30; p<0.0001], a baseline HCV viral load below 600.000IU/mL [AOR 2.97; 95% CI 1.03-8.57; p=0.04] and baseline LDL cholesterol above 100mg/dL [AOR 6.62; 95% CI 1.97-22.19; p=0.002] were independently associated with sustained virological response., Conclusions: Insulin resistance is not a relevant predictor of sustained virological response to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in HIV/HCV co-infected patients.

Objectives: To compare the response to hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy among human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV co-infected patients receiving a nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor [N(t)RTI] backbone consisting of abacavir plus lamivudine with that observed in subjects who receive tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine., Methods: A total of 256 subjects, enrolled in a cohort of 948 HIV-infected patients who received pegylated interferon and ribavirin from October 2001 to January 2006, were included in this study. All patients were taking one protease inhibitor or one non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and abacavir plus lamivudine or tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine as N(t)RTI backbone during HCV therapy. Sustained virological response (SVR) rates in both backbone groups were compared., Results: In an intention-to-treat analysis, 20 out of 70 (29%) individuals under abacavir and 83 out of 186 (45%) under tenofovir showed SVR (P = 0.02). N(t)RTI backbone containing tenofovir was an independent predictor of SVR in the multivariate analysis [adjusted odds ratio (95% CI), 2.6 (1.05-6.9); P = 0.03]. The association between abacavir use and lower SVR was chiefly seen in patients with plasma HCV-RNA load higher than 600 000 IU/mL and genotype 1 or 4. Among patients treated with ribavirin dose <13.2 mg/kg/day, 3 (20%) of those under abacavir versus 22 (52%) under tenofovir reached SVR (P = 0.03), whereas the rates were 31% and 38% (P = 0.4), respectively, in those receiving >/=13.2 mg/kg/day., Conclusions: HIV-infected patients who receive abacavir plus lamivudine respond worse to pegylated interferon plus ribavirin than those who are given tenofovir plus lamivudine or emtricitabine as N(t)RTI backbone, especially in those receiving lower ribavirin doses.

Background: Combination of pegylated interferon (Peg-IFN) and ribavirin is the standard treatment for HCV infection in HIV co-infected patients. However, data available on the efficacy of this therapy in co-infected patients who failed a former interferon-based regimen are limited., Methods: We analysed the efficacy and safety of the Peg-IFN alfa-2a or alfa-2b plus ribavirin combination in a multicentre observational cohort study including 54 HCV/HIV co-infected patients who had failed to respond to or relapsed on interferon-based treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a sustained virological response (SVR), defined as HCV RNA <50 IU/mL 24 weeks after completion of therapy., Results: By intention-to-treat analysis, 30% of the patients achieved an SVR. Viral eradication by genotype was 18.9% (7/37) genotype 1; 57.1% (8/14) genotype 3 and 33.3% (1/3) genotype 4. The only independent predictor of SVR was genotype 3 (odds ratio: 5.3; 95% confidence interval: 1.4-19.8). Fourteen (38%) patients with genotype 1 had undetectable viral load at week 48 of treatment. Nevertheless, 50% of them relapsed during the follow-up period. Severe adverse events or progression of HIV infection did not occur during the study; however, 39% of the patients required Peg-IFN dose reduction because of intolerance or haematological toxicity., Conclusions: Combined Peg-IFN and ribavirin achieved a substantial rate of SVR in HCV/HIV co-infected patients who failed a prior standard interferon-based regimen. The decision to retreat any co-infected patient should be individual-based. More aggressive strategies may be necessary to avoid the high relapse rate observed among patients with genotype 1.

Objectives: To investigate whether concomitant antiretroviral therapy (ART) is a predictor of sustained virological response (SVR) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV)-coinfected patients treated with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin., Methods: Three hundred and ten HIV/HCV-coinfected patients on pegylated interferon plus ribavirin treatment, 258 of them with concurrent ART, were included in this retrospective multicentre study. The predictors of SVR were evaluated., Results: SVR was shown by 114 (37%) subjects. HCV genotype 2 or 3, plasma HCV-RNA load lower than 600 000 IU/mL, an exposure to the therapy against HCV infection > or =80% of the planned dose and baseline CD4 cell counts higher than or equal to 300/mm(3) were predictors of SVR. Likewise, patients without ART and those receiving a combination including tenofovir or stavudine plus lamivudine plus a protease inhibitor (PI) or a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) showed a higher SVR rate than the subjects who were on other ART strategies at baseline [44%, 44% and 29%, respectively; adjusted odd ratio (95% CI) for no ART = 1.96 (1.07-4.76), P = 0.025, and for ART including tenofovir or stavudine plus lamivudine plus a PI or a NNRTI = 2.08 (1.16-3.70), P = 0.014]., Conclusions: The ART strategy on starting therapy with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin is a predictor of SVR in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. Subjects without ART and those receiving combinations of a PI or a NNRTI with a nucleos(t)ide backbone of tenofovir or stavudine plus lamivudine respond better than those who receive other regimens.

Background: Haematological adverse events related to pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) therapy could affect the patients' quality of life; however, the risk factors for severe haematological toxicity associated with this therapy in patients coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HIV are unclear. The objective of this study was to identify predictors of severe haematological toxicity among HIV-HCV-coinfected patients treated with PEG-IFN plus RBV., Methods: This retrospective multicentric study included 237 HIV-HCV-coinfected patients on PEG-IFN plus RBV. Predictors of severe anaemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and overall haematological toxicity were analyzed., Results: Eighty (34%) individuals showed an episode of severe haematological toxicity. Severe anaemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 32 (13%), 42 (18%) and 26 (11%) patients, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, zidovudine use (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 3.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.6-10; P = 0.001), baseline body weight < 65 kg (AOR 2.5; 95% CI 1.1-5; P = 0.024), cirrhosis (AOR 5; 95% CI 1.6-16.6; P = 0.006), PEG-IFN-alpha2a (AOR 2.7; 95% CI 1.1-6.6; P = 0.029) and pretreatment haemoglobin level < 14 g/dl (AOR 2.7; 95% CI 1.3-5.5; P = 0.005) were associated with any kind of severe haematological toxicity. Likewise, haemoglobin level < 13 g/dl, neutrophil counts < 2,500 cells/mm3 and platelet counts < 175,000 cells/mm3 were independent predictors of severe anaemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, respectively., Conclusions: Zidovudine treatment, cirrhosis, baseline low body weight, use of PEG-IFN-alpha2a, and baseline haemoglobin level < 14 g/dl are predictors of overall severe haematological toxicity secondary to PEG-IFN plus RBV in HIV-infected individuals. Low pretreatment levels of each haematological series predict a significant decrease of their values during therapy.

Introduction: The clinical applicability of early viral kinetics at week 4 in predicting sustained virological response (SVR) of pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients is unclear. Our objective was to determine if rapid virological response (RVR) at week 4 of therapy with peg-IFN and RBV could predict SVR among HIV/HCV-coinfected patients., Methods: HIV/HCV-coinfected patients in whom an HCV viral load determination had been carried out at week 4 of therapy were included in the study. The positive predictive value (PPV) and the negative predictive value (NPV) of RVR (undetectable serum HCV RNA at 4 week) for SVR were calculated in the study population. Receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated to determine the best cutoff of HCV RNA decrease to predict treatment failure., Results: A total of 101 HIV/HCV-coinfected patients were included. RVR and SVR were observed in 39 (39%) and in 49 (48%) individuals, respectively. Of patients with RVR, 37/39 patients achieved SVR (PPV: 95%), whereas 50/62 individuals without RVR did not show SVR (NPV: 81%). The highest NPV (96%) was reached by using a cutoff level of HCV RNA decrease of 0.6 log10. By applying this cutoff level, treatment could have been discontinued in 25 (25%) patients., Conclusions: An undetectable serum HCV RNA determination at week 4 of treatment with peg-IFN plus RBV is a reliable predictor of SVR in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients. In addition, a decrease of HCV RNA less than 0.6 log10 at this point of treatment could identify an appreciable proportion of individuals who will fail to achieve SVR.