Search

Purpose: To recommend an international multidisciplinary medical and surgical algorithm of treatment in nasal vasculitis, which will create a more streamlined approach., Methods: A two-centre, international retrospective analysis of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) and levamisole-associated vasculitis (LAV) cases presenting between 2005 and 2019 was carried out. Demographic data, and surgical and medical treatment were recorded. Patients' signs and symptoms were analysed, and recommended treatment strategies outlined with key surgical procedures described., Results: Forty-one GPA patients and 11 LAV patients were included in the study with a mean age of 38.6 and 38.8 years, respectively. A stepwise surgical management approach with reconstructive options is described and includes: (1) examination under general anaesthesia, biopsy, and insertion of silastic nasal splints; (2) septal perforation repair (with caution); (3) mild-to-moderate saddle nose reconstruction with costal cartilage; (4) severe saddle nose reconstruction with osseocartilaginous rib grafts; (5) soft-tissue reconstruction techniques., Conclusions: The management of nasal vasculitis is a particular challenge in facial plastic surgery. It requires a close collaborative approach with a physician skilled in the medical management of vasculitis. Surgery must be planned judiciously, with realistic patient expectations and only after a sustained period of remission. For more severe saddle deformities, the modified osseocartilaginous Andrews technique gives excellent long-term results.

Of the many challenges in rhinoplasty, achieving a satisfactory outcome at the first operation is important. There are multiple reasons for secondary surgery, and generally revisions can be broadly classified into minor (often one area of deficit) or a total redo. Understanding the common technical reasons for failure in primary surgery by analyzing the deformities has resulted in various error patterns emerging. Understanding these patterns means we can modify techniques in primary surgery to reduce the incidence of revision. This article describes our prospective revision rhinoplasty experience over 5 and then 2 years, highlighting the main error patterns encountered. We also describe a stepwise analysis of four frequently encountered key problem areas alongside techniques to address them and offer pearls to help prevent further revision. Comparison of two cohorts of patients from a teaching hospital setting and private practice with the same operating surgeon indicates an increasing tendency to the open approach for revisions. The re-revision rates for these groups are 15.7 and 9%, respectively. Revision rhinoplasty is a difficult operation to perform to the satisfaction of both the surgeon and the patient. Understanding the common technical reasons for failure in primary surgery by fully analyzing the deformities means we can modify techniques in primary surgery to reduce the incidence of revision., (Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.)

Background: We aim to validate a clinical scoring system of external nasal valve collapse. External nasal valve collapse is a rare and challenging condition. We attempted to simplify the examination of the external valve, the surgical planning and the outcome measure. To validate our external valve score, we first assessed its reliability (inter-rater agreement and test-retest repeatability). We secondly considered the clinical relevance by using our scoring system in patients undergoing septorhinoplasty for external valve collapse., Methodology: For validation, 16 Rhinologists scored patients separately on two occasions. For the clinical relevance, 26 patients with external valve collapse were scored pre- and post-operatively (responsiveness). The external valve score was correlated to peak nasal inspiratory flow., Results: The devised scoring system was reliable (substantial agreement between 16 surgeons with reproducibility over time). All patients in our prospective series showed significant improvement in their external valve score. The quality of life measured by the SNOT-22 tool showed significant improvement after surgery., Conclusion: External nasal valve collapse can be diagnosed and graded using this simple scoring system in the outpatient clinic. This paper reinforces the pivotal role of septorhinoplasty surgery in nasal airway reconstruction and the ongoing need to quantify success.