Search

Objective: To describe data on the safety and efficacy of molnupiravir (MP) and nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NM/R) in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs)., Methods: Among patients with SARD being followed in 2 tertiary outpatient rheumatology clinics, we retrospectively identified those infected with SARS-CoV-2 between February and August 2022 who received MP or NM/R. Patients' medical files were reviewed for demographics and disease-related characteristics, as well as coronavirus disease (COVID-19) characteristics, including vaccination status, antiviral treatment, side effects, and COVID-19 outcomes., Results: Seventy-four patients with SARD (52 females) were identified who had been infected with SARS-CoV-2 and received MP (n = 26, 35.1%) or NM/R (n = 48, 64.9%). Most patients were vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 (n = 62, 83.8%). Among frequently used regimens were glucocorticoids (n = 43, 58.1%), mycophenolate mofetil (n = 26, 35.1%), tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (n = 14, 18.9%), methotrexate (n = 13, 17.6%), and rituximab (n = 12, 16.2%). Common adverse events were reported only by 4 patients receiving NM/R (metallic taste, gastrointestinal upset, hypertension), not leading to drug discontinuation. During follow-up, all but 2 patients (n = 72, 97.3%) recovered at home without COVID-19-related complications. Nonetheless, we describe 2 presumptive cases of COVID-19 rebound who progressed to severe COVID-19., Conclusion: These data show a favorable outcome and acceptable safety profile of the 2 oral antiviral therapies MP and NM/R among a high-risk SARD population. However, cases of COVID-19 rebound are being increasingly identified. These findings call for continuous surveillance to capture the real-world efficacy and safety profiles in our subpopulations of interest., (Copyright © 2023 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)

Clinical data on vaccinated patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who have systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory rheumatic diseases (SAARD) are limited. This observational study aimed to report the clinical features and outcomes of COVID-19 among cases with SAARD that were unvaccinated or were 2- and 3-dose vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2 and were consecutively recorded by the treating physician. Unvaccinated and 2- and 3-dose vaccinated patients were compared in terms of COVID-19 symptomatology, hospitalizations, oxygen supplementation requirements, and death rates. From the beginning of the pandemic to February 15, 2022, 134 vaccine-naïve COVID-19 cases were recorded among our study cohort. From March 1, 2021 to February 15, 2022, 89 2-dose vaccinated and 105 3-dose vaccinated patients who were infected with SARS-CoV-2 ≥14 days after the second dose were included. The hospitalization rate was higher in the unvaccinated (n = 36, 26.9%) than in the 2-dose (n = 13, 14.6%, p = 0.03) or 3-dose (n = 5, 4.8%, p < 0.001) vaccinated patients. Severe/critical COVID-19 cases requiring oxygen supplementation were the least among 3-dose vaccinated (n = 4, 3.8%) compared to both 2-dose vaccinated (n = 12, 13.5%, p = 0.018) and unvaccinated (n = 25, 18.7%, p < 0.001) patients. ICU admission and death rates were similar among unvaccinated (n = 5, 3.7% and n = 3, 2.2%, respectively) and 2-dose vaccinated patients (n = 4, 4.5%; and n = 2, 2.2%, respectively), while no 3-dose vaccinated patients died or required ICU admission. Logistic regression analysis revealed a significant inverse association between 3-dose vaccination and severe/critical COVID-19 (OR = 0.078, 95% CI: 0.022-0.273, p < 0.001). In conclusion, these findings argue in favor of booster vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with SAARD., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To investigate humoral responses and safety of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in systemic autoimmune and autoinflammatory rheumatic disease (SAARD) patients subjected or not to treatment modifications during vaccination., Methods: A nationwide, multicenter study, including 605 SAARD patients and 116 controls, prospectively evaluated serum anti-SARS-CoV-2 S1-protein IgG antibody titers, side-effects, and disease activity, one month after complete vaccination, in terms of distinct treatment modification strategies (none, partial and extended modifications). Independent risk factors associated with hampered humoral responses were identified by data-driven multivariable logistic regression analysis., Results: Patients with extended treatment modifications responded to vaccines similarly to controls as well as SAARD patients without immunosuppressive therapy (97.56% vs 100%, p = 0.2468 and 97.56% vs 97.46%, p > 0.9999, respectively). In contrast, patients with partial or without therapeutic modifications responded in 87.50% and 84.50%, respectively. Furthermore, SAARD patients with extended treatment modifications developed higher anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels compared to those without or with partial modifications (median:7.90 vs 7.06 vs 7.1, p = 0.0003 and p = 0.0195, respectively). Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), rituximab (RTX) and methotrexate (MTX) negatively affected anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral responses. In 10.5% of vaccinated patients, mild clinical deterioration was noted; however, no differences in the incidence of deterioration were observed among the distinct treatment modification SAARD subgroups. Side-effects were generally comparable between SAARD patients and controls., Conclusions: In SAARD patients, mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are effective and safe, both in terms of side-effects and disease flares. Treatment with MMF, RTX and/or MTX compromises anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses, which are restored upon extended treatment modifications without affecting disease activity., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)