1. Comment on "Pressure‐to‐Depth Conversion Models for Metamorphic Rocks: Derivation and Applications" by Bauville and Yamato.
- Author
-
Jiang, Dazhi
- Subjects
METAMORPHIC rocks ,HIGH-pressure minerals ,PLATE tectonics ,RHEOLOGY ,MICROSTRUCTURE - Abstract
Bauville and Yamato (2021, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gc009280) (G‐cubed) propose model‐based methods to convert metamorphic pressures to depths based on the claim that pressure data from global (ultra)high‐pressure([U]HP) rocks challenge the lithostatic assumption and support their model which invokes excessive overpressures. It is argued here that the opposite is true: Natural pressure data are fully consistent with the lithostatic assumption. They reflect selection of (U)HP rocks by accessibility and preservation. The data are however inconsistent with the model predictions of Yamato and Brun (2017, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2852) and Bauville and Yamato (2021, https://doi.org/10.1029/2020gc009280). Furthermore, their model requires critical assumptions that are not justified by the principles of rock mechanics and unsupported by microstructures from (U)HP rocks. Key Points: Pressure data from (ultra)high pressure rocks are compatible with lithostatic assumption but are inconsistent with excessive overpressuresModel invoking excessive overpressures requires assumptions not justifiable and is unsupported by rock microstructuresTectonic fabrics cannot represent stress states and Mohr‐Coulomb plasticity is independent of stress rotation [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF