Search

Unlabelled: From December 1999 until July 2001, a phase I dose escalation study was performed with (186)Re-labeled bivatuzumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against CD44v6, on patients with inoperable recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer. The aim of the trial was to assess the safety and tolerability of intravenously administered (186)Re-bivatuzumab and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of (186)Re-bivatuzumab. The data were also used for dosimetric analysis of the treated patients. Dosimetry is used to estimate the absorbed doses by nontarget organs, as well as by tumors. It can also help to explain toxicity that is observed and to predict organs at risk because of the therapy given., Methods: Whole-body scintigraphy was used to draw regions around sites or organs of interest. Residence times in these organs and sites were calculated and entered into the MIRDOSE3 program, to obtain absorbed doses in all target organs except for red marrow. The red marrow dose was calculated using a blood-derived method. Twenty-one studies on 18 patients, 5 female and 16 male, were used for dosimetry., Results: The mean red marrow doses were 0.49 +/- 0.03 mGy/MBq for men and 0.64 +/- 0.03 mGy/MBq for women. The normal organ with the highest absorbed dose appeared to be the kidney (mean dose, 1.61 +/- 0.75 mGy/MBq in men and 2.15 +/- 0.95 mGy/MBq in women; maximum kidney dose in all patients, 11 Gy), but the doses absorbed are not expected to lead to renal toxicity. Other organs with doses exceeding 0.5 mGy/MBq were the lungs, the spleen, the heart, the liver, the bones, and the testes. The doses delivered to the tumor, recalculated to the MTD level of 1.85 GBq/m(2), ranged from 3.8 to 76.4 Gy, with a median of 12.4 Gy. A good correlation was found between platelet and white blood cell counts and the administered amount of activity per kilogram of body weight (r = -0.79)., Conclusion: Dosimetric analysis of the data revealed that the range of doses to normal organs seems to be well within acceptable and safe limits. Tumor doses ranged from 4 to 76 Gy. Given the acceptable tumor doses, (186)Re-labeled bivatuzumab could be a good candidate for future adjuvant radioimmunotherapy in patients with minimal residual disease.

Purpose: In previous studies, we have shown the potential of radioimmunotherapy (RIT) with (186)Re-labeled chimeric monoclonal antibody (MAb) U36 for treatment of head and neck cancer. A limitation of this anti-CD44v6 MAb, however, appeared to be its immunogenicity, resulting in human antichimeric antibodies in 40% of the patients. Aiming for a less immunogenic anti-CD44v6 MAb, the humanized MAb BIWA 4 (bivatuzumab) was introduced. In the present Phase I RIT study, we determined the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and therapeutic potential of (186)Re-labeled BIWA 4 in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck., Experimental Design: Twenty patients with inoperable recurrent and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma received a single dose of (186)Re-labeled BIWA 4 in radiation dose-escalation steps of 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 mCi/m(2). Three patients received a second dose at least 3 months after the initial dose. After each administration, whole-body images as well as planar and tomographic images of the head and neck region were obtained, and the pharmacokinetics and the development of human antihuman antibody responses were determined. Radiation absorbed doses were calculated for whole body, red marrow, organs, and tumor., Results: First and second administrations were all well tolerated, and targeting of tumor lesions proved to be excellent. The only significant manifestations of toxicity were dose-limiting myelotoxicity consisting of thrombo- and leukocytopenia and, to a lesser extent, oral mucositis (grade 2). Grade 4 myelotoxicity was seen in two patients treated with 60 mCi/m(2). The MTD was established at 50 mCi/m(2), at which level dose-limiting myelotoxicity was seen in one of six patients. Stable disease, varying between 6 and 21 weeks, was observed in three of six patients treated at the MTD level. The median tumor dose, recalculated to MTD level, was 12.4 Gy. The absorbed dose in red marrow was 1.82 +/- 0.11 cGy/mCi for males and 2.35 +/- 0.10 for females. Two patients experienced a human antihuman antibody response. Pharmacokinetics showed consistency across patients and within the three patients receiving (186)Re-BIWA 4 on two occasions., Conclusions: This study shows that (186)Re-labeled BIWA 4 can safely be administered, also in a repeated way. The MTD was established at 50 mCi/m(2). In comparison with the previously described anti-CD44v6 MAb U36, the humanized MAb BIWA 4 seems to be less immunogenic. The fact that antitumor effects were seen in incurable patients with bulky disease justifies the evaluation of RIT with (186)Re-labeled BIWA 4 in an adjuvant setting.

Purpose: Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is an effective, new treatment modality for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). The aim of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose and a first impression of the therapeutic potential of (186)Re-epratuzumab in patients with NHL., Experimental Design: Patients with relapsed or refractory CD22-positive NHL of diverse histopathology and prior treatments received (99m)Tc-labeled epratuzumab (anti-CD22 IgG1), followed by RIT with (186)Re-epratuzumab 1 week later. Dose escalation of RIT was started at 0.5 GBq/m(2). Three patients were entered per dose level. If no dose-limiting toxicity occurred, the dose was increased by 0.5 GBq/m(2); otherwise three additional patients were included on that dose level., Results: A total of 18 patients received a diagnostic dose of (99m)Tc-epratuzumab. Fifteen patients were actually treated with (186)Re-epratuzumab at four different dose levels, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 GBq/m(2). During or after infusion of (186)Re-epratuzumab, no adverse reactions were seen. In all patients, a transient decrease of leukocyte and platelet levels was observed 1 month after treatment. At the 1.5-GBq/m(2) dose level, one grade 4 hematological toxicity was observed. At the highest dose level of 2 GBq/m(2), no grade 4 hematological toxicity was seen, but WBC and platelet counts of two of the three patients did not recover completely. One patient had a complete remission lasting 4 months. Four patients had a partial remission, lasting 3, 3, 6, and 14 months, respectively. Four patients had stable disease for 3, 3, 7, and 9 months, respectively., Conclusions: (186)Re-epratuzumab at a dose of 2.0 GBq/m(2) is well tolerated without major toxicity. A single dose of (186)Re-epratuzumab led to objective responses in 5 of 15 treated patients.