Search

Objective: To evaluate the risk of inducing RhD immunisation in pregnancies of RhD-negative mothers with an RhD-positive fetus undergoing chorionic villus samplings (CVS) or amniocenteses (AC)., Design, Setting and Population: Registry-based study in a Danish cohort which has not been given rhesus prophylaxis., Methods: Data were retrieved from the Department of Clinical Immunology at Rigshospitalet. All RhD-negative women carrying an RhD-positive fetus with screen test results from weeks 8-12 and weeks 25-29 were linked to data from the Danish Fetal Medicine Database. Data were divided into cases where no invasive prenatal diagnostic procedure was performed, cases that had AC performed, and cases that had CVS performed., Main Outcome Measures: A comparison of the proportion of women who developed RhD immunisation between the two screen tests., Results: The cohort consisted of 10 085 women: 9353 had no invasive procedures performed, 189 had AC and 543 had CVS performed. No women were immunised spontaneously or due to the procedure between the first and second screen test in the group with no procedure performed, or in the AC group. One woman was immunised in the CVS group. When comparing the proportion of women who was immunised in the CVS group with the no invasive test group a non-significant difference was found (P = 0.055)., Conclusion: The RhD immunisation rate before gestational weeks 25-29 in RhD-negative women carrying an RhD-positive fetus is very low, even in women undergoing prenatal invasive testing without rhesus prophylaxis., Tweetable Abstract: The RhD immunisation rate during pregnancy is very low even in women undergoing prenatal invasive testing., (© 2019 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.)

Background and Objectives: A targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis programme was implemented in Denmark where anti-D immunoglobulin is given based on the result from noninvasive antenatal screening for fetal RHD. Our objective was to evaluate compliance with this new programme right after its initiation., Materials and Methods: We examined the treatment outcome of 239 D-negative pregnant women who gave birth at our hospital between June and September 2010., Results: The majority of these women (90%) underwent antenatal RHD screening, 86% of the women who were recommended antenatal prophylaxis received anti-D, and 99% of the women who delivered RhD-positive infants received postnatal anti-D., Conclusion: These compliance results are acceptable as they were obtained only a few months after the initiation of the new prophylaxis regime. However, suggestions to further improve compliance are presented., (© 2012 The Author(s). Vox Sanguinis © 2012 International Society of Blood Transfusion.)

Prophylactic anti-D is a very safe and effective therapy for the suppression of anti-D immunization and thus prevention of haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn. However, migration from countries with low health standards and substantial cuts in public health expenses have increased the incidence of anti-D immunization in many "developed" countries. Therefore, this forum focuses on prenatal monitoring standards and treatment strategies in pregnancies with anti-D alloimmunization. The following questions were addressed, and a response was obtained from 12 centres, mainly from Europe.

Objective: To evaluate the risk of inducing RhD immunisation in pregnancies of RhD-negative mothers with an RhD-positive fetus undergoing chorionic villus samplings (CVS) or amniocenteses (AC).Design, Setting and Population: Registry-based study in a Danish cohort which has not been given rhesus prophylaxis.Methods: Data were retrieved from the Department of Clinical Immunology at Rigshospitalet. All RhD-negative women carrying an RhD-positive fetus with screen test results from weeks 8-12 and weeks 25-29 were linked to data from the Danish Fetal Medicine Database. Data were divided into cases where no invasive prenatal diagnostic procedure was performed, cases that had AC performed, and cases that had CVS performed.Main Outcome Measures: A comparison of the proportion of women who developed RhD immunisation between the two screen tests.Results: The cohort consisted of 10 085 women: 9353 had no invasive procedures performed, 189 had AC and 543 had CVS performed. No women were immunised spontaneously or due to the procedure between the first and second screen test in the group with no procedure performed, or in the AC group. One woman was immunised in the CVS group. When comparing the proportion of women who was immunised in the CVS group with the no invasive test group a non-significant difference was found (P = 0.055).Conclusion: The RhD immunisation rate before gestational weeks 25-29 in RhD-negative women carrying an RhD-positive fetus is very low, even in women undergoing prenatal invasive testing without rhesus prophylaxis.Tweetable Abstract: The RhD immunisation rate during pregnancy is very low even in women undergoing prenatal invasive testing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]