Search

Food restriction (FR) decreases brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) expression in hypothalamic and hindbrain regions that regulate feeding and metabolic efficiency, while increasing expression in hippocampal and neocortical regions. Drugs of abuse alter BDNF expression within the mesocorticolimbic dopamine (DA) pathway, and modifications of BDNF expression within this pathway alter drug-directed behavior. Although FR produces a variety of striatal neuroadaptations and potentiates the rewarding effects of abused drugs, the effects of FR on BDNF expression and function within the DA pathway are unknown. The primary purpose of the present study was to examine the effect of FR on protein levels of BDNF and its tropomyosin receptor kinase B (TrkB) receptor in component structures of the mesocorticolimbic pathway. Three to four weeks of FR, with stabilization of rats at 80% of initial body weight, did not alter BDNF or TrkB levels in nucleus accumbens, caudate-putamen, or medial prefrontal cortex. However, FR decreased TrkB levels in the ventral tegmental area (VTA), without change in levels of BDNF protein or mRNA. The finding that FR also decreased TrkB levels in substantia nigra, with elevation of BDNF protein, suggests that decreased TrkB in VTA could be a residual effect of increased BDNF during an earlier phase of FR. Voltage-clamp recordings in VTA DA neurons indicated decreased glutamate receptor transmission. These data might predict lower average firing rates in FR relative to ad libitum fed subjects, which would be consistent with previous evidence of decreased striatal DA transmission and upregulation of postsynaptic DA receptor signaling. However, FR subjects also displayed elevated VTA levels of phospho-ERK1/2, which is an established mediator of synaptic plasticity. Because VTA neurons are heterogeneous with regard to neurochemistry, function, and target projections, the relationship(s) between the three changes observed in VTA, and their involvement in the augmented striatal and behavioral responsiveness of FR subjects to drugs of abuse, remains speculative., (Copyright © 2011 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Previous findings suggest that neuroadaptations downstream of D-1 dopamine (DA) receptor stimulation in nucleus accumbens (NAc) are involved in the enhancement of drug reward by chronic food restriction (FR). Given the high co-expression of D-1 and GluR1 AMPA receptors in NAc, and the regulation of GluR1 channel conductance and trafficking by D-1-linked intracellular signaling cascades, the present study examined effects of the D-1 agonist, SKF-82958, on NAc GluR1 phosphorylation, intracranial electrical self-stimulation reward (ICSS), and reversibility of reward effects by a polyamine GluR1 antagonist, 1-NA-spermine, in ad libitum fed (AL) and FR rats. Systemically administered SKF-82958, or brief ingestion of a 10% sucrose solution, increased NAc GluR1 phosphorylation on Ser845, but not Ser831, with a greater effect in FR than AL rats. Microinjection of SKF-82958 in NAc shell produced a reward-potentiating effect that was greater in FR than AL rats, and was reversed by co-injection of 1-NA-spermine. GluR1 abundance in whole cell and synaptosomal fractions of NAc did not differ between feeding groups, and microinjection of AMPA, while affecting ICSS, did not exert greater effects in FR than AL rats. These results suggest a role of NAc GluR1 in the reward-potentiating effect of D-1 DA receptor stimulation and its enhancement by FR. Moreover, GluR1 involvement appears to occur downstream of D-1 DA receptor stimulation rather than reflecting a basal increase in GluR1 expression or function. Based on evidence that phosphorylation of GluR1 on Ser845 primes synaptic strengthening, the present results may reflect a mechanism via which FR normally facilitates reward-related learning to re-align instrumental behavior with environmental contingencies under the pressure of negative energy balance.

Rationale: Previous studies indicate that chronic food restriction augments the rewarding and motor-activating effects of diverse drugs of abuse. The drugs that have so far proved susceptible to the augmenting effect of food restriction all increase synaptic concentrations of dopamine (DA). It is not known whether behavioral effects of selective, direct DA receptor agonists are also subject to the augmenting effect of food restriction., Objectives: The first objective of this study was to investigate whether the rewarding and locomotor-activating effects of the D1 agonist, A77636, and the D2 agonist, quinpirole are augmented by chronic food restriction. The second purpose was to investigate whether the augmented rewarding and locomotor-activating effects of d-amphetamine in food-restricted rats are reversed by the D1 antagonist, SCH23390., Methods: Rewarding effects of drugs were measured in terms of their ability to lower the threshold for lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation (LHSS) using a rate-frequency method. Locomotor-activating effects were measured in terms of the number of midline crossings exhibited by rats in a shuttle apparatus., Results: A77636 (1.0 and 2.5 mg/kg, i.p.) produced a greater threshold-lowering effect in food-restricted than ad libitum fed rats but produced variable effects on locomotor activity with no difference between groups. Quinpirole (0.2 and 0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) produced a marginally greater threshold-lowering effect in food-restricted rats and a dramatic locomotor response that was exclusive to food-restricted rats. The D1 antagonist, SCH23390, at a dose of 0.01 mg/kg (i.p.), had no effect on the lowering of LHSS threshold by amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg, i.p.) in ad libitum fed rats but blocked the augmentation otherwise observed in food-restricted rats. SCH23390, at a dose of 0.025 mg/kg, had no effect on locomotor activity induced by amphetamine (0.5 mg/kg) in ad libitum fed rats but blocked the augmentation otherwise observed in food-restricted rats., Conclusions: These results indicate that the augmentation of reward by food restriction extends to drugs that bypass the DA terminal and act postsynaptically. When taken together with prior immunohistochemical and behavioral findings, these results suggest that food restriction may increase the "enabling" effect of the D1 receptor on DA-mediated behaviors.

Rationale: Chronic food restriction augments the self-administration and locomotor stimulating effects of opiates, psychostimulants and NMDA antagonists. The extent to which these effects can be attributed to changes in drug pharmacokinetics and bioavailability versus sensitivity of the neuronal circuits that mediate the affected behavioral functions, has not been established. Recent studies point to central adaptive changes insofar as rewarding, locomotor and c-fos-inducing effects of amphetamine and MK-801, injected directly into the lateral ventricle, are greater in food-restricted than ad libitum fed rats. The increased expression of c-fos in nucleus accumbens (NAC) shell, in particular, suggests that food restriction may augment drug reward by modulating dopamine (DA) synaptic function in this area., Objectives: The first purpose of this study was to investigate whether the rewarding effects of cocaine and the delta1 opioid agonist DPDPE, both of which increase DA synaptic transmission, are augmented by food restriction. The second purpose was to determine whether the delta2 opioid agonist, deltorphin-II, which has been reported to exert DA-independent rewarding effects, is subject to the potentiating effect of food restriction., Methods: Rewarding effects of drugs were measured in terms of their ability to lower the threshold for lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation (LHSS) using a rate-frequency method., Results: In separate experiments, cocaine (50, 100 and 150 microg, ICV) and DPDPE (10 and 25 microg, ICV) produced greater threshold-lowering effects in food-restricted than ad libitum fed rats. Deltorphin-II (5.0, 10 and 25 microg, ICV) had no effect on reward thresholds, regardless of feeding regimen., Conclusions: While the reported DA-independence of deltorphin-II rewarding effects seemed to offer a means of testing the hypothesis that DA transmission is the critical modulated variable in food-restricted subjects, rewarding effects of this compound could not be demonstrated in the LHSS paradigm. The present results do, however, confirm and extend prior findings indicating that the enhanced self-administration of abused drugs by food-restricted subjects is due to enhanced sensitivity of a final common pathway for drug reward.

Chronic food restriction increases the systemic self-administration and locomotor-stimulating effect of abused drugs. However, it is not clear whether these behavioral changes reflect enhanced rewarding potency or a CNS-based modulatory process. The purpose of this study was to determine whether food restriction specifically increases the rewarding potency of drugs, as indexed by their threshold-lowering effect on lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation, and whether any such effect can be attributed to an enhanced central response rather than changes in drug disposition. When drugs were administered systemically, food restriction potentiated the threshold-lowering effect of amphetamine (0.125, 0.25, and 0.5 mg/kg, i.p.), phencyclidine (1.0, 2.0, and 3.0 mg/kg, i.p.), and dizocilpine (MK-801) (0.0125, 0.05, and 0.1 mg/kg, i.p.) but not nicotine (0.15, 0.3, 0.45 mg/kg, s.c.). When amphetamine (25.0, 50.0, and 100.0 microgram) and MK-801 (5.0, 10.0, and 20.0 microgram) were administered via the intracerebroventricular route, food restriction again potentiated the threshold-lowering effects and increased the locomotor-stimulating effects of both drugs. These results indicate that food restriction increases the sensitivity of neural substrates for rewarding and stimulant effects of drugs. In light of work that attributes rewarding effects of MK-801 to blockade of NMDA receptors on medium spiny neurons in nucleus accumbens, the elements affected by food restriction may lie downstream from the mesoaccumbens dopamine neurons whose terminals are the site of amphetamine-rewarding action. Possible metabolic-endocrine triggers of this effect are discussed, as is the likelihood that mechanisms mediating the modulatory effect of food restriction differ from those mediating sensitization by intermittent drug exposure.

It was previously observed that the corticosteroid synthesis inhibitor, aminoglutethimide (AG), markedly facilitates lateral hypothalamide (AG), markedly facilitates lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation (LHSS) in food-restricted rats. This effect is not present 30 min after injection when plasma corticosterone levels are suppressed, but rather at 2 h when corticosterone has recovered from suppression. In experiment 1, it was confirmed that AG (50.0 mg/kg, s.c.) lowers the threshold for LHSS in food-restricted rats but not in control rats that have ad libitum access to food. This effect occurred independently of whether food restriction, by itself, lowered threshold. Experiment 2 examined whether the facilitation of LHSS coincides with biosynthetic rebound of corticosteroid precursors. While a pregnenolone surge was demonstrated by radioimmunoassay, dose-response testing with exogenous pregnenolone and progesterone (0.1, 1.0 and 10.0 mg/kg, s.c.) failed to confirm the prediction that one of these precursors facilitates reward. Therefore, a general test of the involvement of adrenocortical biosynthetic events was conducted in experiment 3 where rats were adrenalectomized (ADX) or sham-operated prior to food restriction. Surprisingly, ADX did not diminish the effect of AG. This finding raises the possibility of a CNS, rather than adrenal, site of action. AG is known to penetrate the blood-brain barrier and exert weak anticonvulsant effects. The facilitation of reward may result from central inhibitory effects of the drug and share a common basis with the enhanced reinforcing potency of other CNS depressants in food-restricted rats.

An emerging body of evidence indicates that the adrenal hormone corticosterone modulates behavioral effects of abused drugs. Recently, it was reported that the self-administration and locomotor stimulatory effect of cocaine are blocked by adrenalectomy (ADX). In order to evaluate the effect of ADX on the brain reward system in general, and cocaine reward in particular, the effect of ADX on lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation (LHSS) and its facilitation by cocaine were investigated. Using curve-shift methodology, effects of cocaine (1.0, 3.0 and 10.0 mg/kg, i.p.) on the rewarding efficacy of brain stimulation were determined in ADX rats, with and without corticosterone supplementation, and compared with sham-operated controls. Results indicate that ADX does not affect LHSS or the facilitatory effect of cocaine. The divergence between these results and the results of cocaine self-administration studies is discussed in terms of the neuroanatomical and psychological processing of reward.

The incentive-motivating effects of external stimuli are dependent, in part, upon the internal need state of the organism. The increased rewarding efficacy of food as a function of energy deficit, for example, has obvious adaptive value. The enhancement of food reward extends, however, to drugs of abuse and electrical brain stimulation, probably due to a shared neural substrate. Research reviewed in this paper uses lateral hypothalamic electrical stimulation to probe the sensitivity of the brain reward system and investigate mechanisms through which metabolic need, induced by chronic food restriction and streptozotocin-induced diabetes, sensitizes this system. Results indicate that sensitivity to rewarding brain stimulation varies inversely with declining body weight. The effect is not mimicked by pharmacological glucoprivation or lipoprivation in ad libitum fed animals; sensitization appears to depend on persistent metabolic need or adipose depletion. While the literature suggests elevated plasma corticosterone as a peripheral trigger of reward sensitization, sensitization was not reversed by meal-induced or pharmacological suppression of plasma corticosterone. Centrally, reward sensitization is mediated by opioid receptors, since the effect is reversed by intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) infusion of naltrexone, TCTAP (mu antagonist) and nor-binaltorphimine (kappa antagonist). The fact that these same treatments, as well as i.c.v. infusion of dynorphin A antiserum, block the feeding response to lateral hypothalamic stimulation suggests that feeding and reward sensitization are mediated by a common opioid mechanism. Using in vitro autoradiography, radioimmunoassays and a solution hybridization mRNA assay, brain regional mu and kappa opioid receptor binding, levels of prodynorphin-derived peptides, and prodynorphin mRNA, respectively, were measured in food-restricted and diabetic rats. Changes that could plausibly be involved in reward sensitization are discussed, with emphasis on the increased dynorphin A1-3 and prodynorphin mRNA levels in lateral hypothalamic neurons that innervate the pontine parabrachial nucleus, where mu binding decreased and kappa binding increased. Finally, the possible linkage between metabolic need and activation of a brain opioid mechanism is discussed, as is evidence supporting the relevance of these findings to drug abuse.

Chronic food restriction sensitizes animals to the rewarding effects of food, drugs and lateral hypothalamic electrical stimulation. The present study employed a curve-shift analysis of lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation (LHSS) to evaluate whether the elevated plasma corticosterone levels that accompany food restriction mediate the sensitization of reward. In Experiment 1, two adrenocorticoid synthesis inhibitors, aminoglutethimide and metyrapone, were administered to food-restricted rats and the magnitude of plasma corticosterone suppression was determined at two post-administration time points. In Experiment 2, these compounds were administered to ad libitum fed and food-restricted rats whose LHSS behavior was evaluated at a time coincident with suppression of corticosterone. It was found that neither compound reversed the sensitizing effect of food-restriction on the rewarding efficacy of brain stimulation. However, aminoglutethimide (50 mg/kg) produced an increase in maximal response rates (a performance factor) across groups while metyrapone (100 mg/kg) produced a decrease. The most interesting result of this study was that 2 h after aminoglutethimide administration, when corticosterone levels had recovered from suppression, the rewarding efficacy of LHSS increased markedly in food-restricted rats. Possible explanations for this effect, including adrenocortical rebound, alterations in neurosteroid synthesis, and exacerbation of metabolic need are discussed.

Chronic food restriction lowers the threshold for lateral hypothalamic electrical self-stimulation (LHSS). This effect has previously been interpreted to reflect a sensitization of reward. In the present study a curve-shift method was used to explicitly differentiate effects of food restriction on brain stimulation rewarding efficacy and performance. Food restriction consistently shifted rate-frequency curves to the left, lowering the M-50 and Theta-0 parameters of rewarding efficacy. Asymptotic rates of reinforcement and slopes of rate-frequency functions were unaffected, confirming that food restriction does not facilitate LHSS by enhancing performance. In this and previous studies, LHSS in food-restricted rats was measured in the period immediately preceding the daily meal when hunger (i.e., period since last meal) and plasma corticosterone are at peak levels. In the light of evidence that corticosterone may regulate sensitivity of the mesolimbic dopamine pathway and account for the sensitizing effect of stress on psychomotor effects of opiates and stimulants, LHSS and corticosterone were measured in the immediate pre-and post-meal periods. While all food-restricted rats displayed elevated corticosterone levels in the pre-meal period and generally displayed a decline to control levels in the post-meal period, the sensitization of reward was not reversed in the post-meal period. These results indicate that chronic food restriction produces a sensitization of reward that does not depend upon the acute state of hunger that precedes the daily meal and does not vary with dynamic changes in plasma corticosterone level.

Chronic food restriction and weight loss were previously shown to produce a naltrexone-reversible facilitation of perifornical lateral hypothalamic self-stimulation. In the present study, high affinity receptor-selective antagonists were used to determine the particular opioid receptor type(s) that mediates the facilitation of reward by food restriction. Separate groups of food-restricted and ad libitum fed rats were used to conduct i.c.v. dose-response studies with TCTAP (mu), norbinaltorphimine (kappa), and naltrindole (delta). The highest dose of naltrindole (50.0 nmol) raised self-stimulation threshold independently of feeding condition. This suggests that delta opioid activity is involved in self-stimulation under basal conditions and may explain previous findings that high systemic doses of naloxone or naltrexone reduce self-stimulation. The highest doses of TCTAP and norbinaltorphimine (5.0 and 50.0 nmol, respectively) reversed the lowering of self-stimulation threshold produced by food restriction while having no effect on thresholds of ad libitum fed rats. These results suggest that state-dependent mu and kappa opioid activity facilitate reward. Since food restriction is known to increase the rewarding effect of food and drugs of abuse, the opioid mechanism identified in the present study may mediate adaptive behavior and, under some circumstances, pathological behavior. The possible relation of state-dependent opioid activity to Anorexia Nervosa, binge eating, and the high comorbidity of eating disorders and substance abuse is discussed.

The role of central kappa opioid receptors in the regulation of feeding and reward was evaluated using electrical brain stimulation paradigms in combination with the selective kappa antagonist, norbinaltorphimine (nor-BNI). Lateral ventricular injection of 10.0 and 50.0 nmol doses of nor-BNI increased the lateral hypothalamic stimulation frequency threshold for eliciting feeding behavior but had no effect on threshold for self-stimulation in the absence of food. This result is identical to those previously reported for naloxone and antibodies to dynorphin A and suggests that opioid activity is associated with feeding behavior rather than the eliciting brain stimulation. A further similarity between naloxone, dynorphin antiserum, and nor-BNI is their preferential effect on feeding threshold values obtained later, rather than initially, in a post-injection test session. This pattern of threshold elevation is shown to differ from that of the appetite suppressants, amphetamine and phenylpropanolamine, which elevate threshold uniformly throughout a post-injection test. The signature pattern of threshold elevation produced by opioid antagonism is consistent with the hypothesis that opioid activity is involved in the maintenance rather than the initiation of feeding. Specifically, it is hypothesized that a dynorphin A/kappa receptor mechanism is triggered by food taste and sustains feeding behavior by facilitating incentive reward.

We have previously shown that feeding induced by electrical stimulation in the lateral hypothalamus of rats is inhibited by naloxone but not its quaternary analogue. In the present study, effects of morphine and loperamide -an opiate that does not pass the blood-brain barrier- were examined. Loperamide inhibited stimulation-induced feeding; reversal of this effect by quaternary naloxone confirmed the peripheral site of action. A low dose of morphine (1.25 mg/kg) facilitated feeding but higher doses were inhibitory. An inhibitory dose of morphine became facilitory, however, when preceded by quaternary naloxone. It therefore appears that central opioid activity promotes ingestive behavior while peripheral activity inhibits ingestion. To evaluate the function served by the central facilitory process, we exploited the relation that exists between feeding and self-stimulation elicited through a common electrode. It was found that potentiation of self-stimulation by food deprivation is blocked by naloxone. It is concluded that endogenous opioid activity may promote feeding by enhancing the reward value of food as a function of hunger.

Selective agonists for mu- and kappa-opioid receptor types were infused, bilaterally, into the intralaminar central lateral nucleus of the rat. Subcataleptic doses of the mu-agonist, DAGO (0.25 and 1.0 microgram), elevated tailshock threshold for eliciting pain vocalization and motor responses. The hyperalgesic effect of U50,488 is not likely to be the result of antagonist action at a mu 2-isoreceptor; the general mu-antagonist, naloxone, and its less lipophilic quaternary analogue, both failed to produce a significant reduction in pain thresholds. Paralleling their effects on pain, DAGO and U50,488 elevated and reduced, respectively, lateral hypothalamic electrical stimulation threshold for positive reinforcement. These results suggest that medial thalamic opioid mechanisms are not exclusively involved in pain modulation but may generally regulate the responsiveness of the organism to motivating stimuli. Moreover, mu- and kappa-receptors may mediate opposite behavioral effects of opioid peptides.