Search

This study was designed to compare the burden of illness (BOI) in patients at high risk versus low risk of developing a major cardiovascular (CV) event.This retrospective claims data analysis included commercial health plan members identified with a primary diagnosis on a medical claim for cardiovascular disease (CVD) from January 1, 2001 through December 31, 2002. Patients were categorized as: low risk (LR), high risk (HR), or high risk aged≥55 (HR55), based on the ONTARGET clinical trial.Most patients (85%) were in the LR category (8% in HR55, 7% in HR). A significantly greater proportion of patients in the HR55 group were hospitalized and experienced a greater number of ambulatory visits compared with LR and HR patients. Controlling for covariates, HR55 patients averaged $22,502 in paid healthcare services over 2 years versus $15,645 for HR patients and $11,423 for LR patients (p0.001). CV-related costs represented about 46% of costs for the HR55 group, versus 41% for the HR group and 31% for the LR group.Claims data are collected for the purpose of payment and not research and the presence of a diagnosis code is not proof of disease, due to possible coding errors or the use of a rule-out criterion. Also, patients who died in the follow-up were not included in the analyses, resulting in lower BOI estimates. Finally, the results of this study reflect treatment of CVD in managed-care settings, and may not be applicable to a different type of population.This study demonstrates the high BOI associated with CVD, especially for patients within the high-risk group aged≥55 years. Opportunities exist for reducing costs in this population.

Treatment effectiveness depends upon administering medications as prescribed, and adherence is critical for Alzheimer's disease (AD) patients to receive optimal benefit from therapy. The objective of this study was to investigate factors associated with adherence to AD oral medications.This retrospective claims analysis identified AD patients who initiated oral AD therapy (rivastigmine, donepezil, galantamine, or memantine) between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2007 from a large US health plan. Patient baseline characteristics were assessed during the 6-month pre-index period; outcomes were assessed during the 1-year post-index period. Pill burden was measured as a count of unique units of medication/day. Adherence was measured by medication possession ratio (MPR), with MPRor=80% defined as adherent. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess how potential covariates affect adherence probability.A total of 3091 AD patients (36% male; mean age 80 [8.25 SD]) were identified. Only 58% of patients were adherent to oral AD medications. Compared to patients75 years, patientsor=86 years were likely to be more adherent (OR = 1.401, p0.001). Other factors found to be positively associated with the probability of adherence to AD medications were male gender (OR = 1.175, p0.05), overall pill burden (OR = 1.192, p0.001), and a lower formulary tier status of the AD medication (OR = 1.332, p0.001).Among the several variables assessed, being male,or=86 years of age, having a greater overall daily pill burden, or using a lower formulary tier AD medication was associated with better adherence to oral AD medication in patients diagnosed with AD. The database had no information on caregiver support, medication management interventions, or use of adherence aids that may have affected adherence in this cohort, yet, a substantial proportion of patients (42%) remained non-adherent. A better understanding of the causes of non-adherence is necessary, and methods to improve adherence, such as transdermal medications and educational programs, should be considered.

To assess 12-month healthcare resource utilization and costs associated with upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding events.Patients hospitalized with a UGI bleeding event were identified in US national health-plan claims data (1999-2003) and propensity matched to control patients without UGI bleeding in the same health plan. Matching criteria included age, gender, index date, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, geographic region, and prior medical utilization.A total of 9,033 UGI-bleed patients and 579,018 control patients met the inclusion criteria, yielding 4,651 matched pairs. After matching, differences between the UGI bleed and general population cohorts remained for office visits, ER visits, and ER costs during the 6-month baseline period prior to the index date. During the 12 months following the index date, both UGI-related healthcare utilization and total healthcare, medical, and pharmacy costs incurred by the UGI-bleed cohort were significantly greater (p0.0001) than those incurred by the general population cohort (mean of $20,405 vs. 3,652), even after excluding the initial hospitalization costs (mean of $11,228 vs. 3,652). Costs were primarily due to inpatient hospitalizations (mean of $13,059 for the UGI-bleed cohort vs. $729 for the general population cohort) and ambulatory services (mean of $4,037 for the UGI-bleed cohort vs. $1,537 for the general population cohort). Sixteen percent of the UGI-bleed cohort had a GI-related hospitalization, and about 40% of total costs occurred after the initial hospitalization.Patients with UGI bleeds experienced significantly higher (p0.0001) 12-month health-resource utilization and costs than patients without UGI bleeds. This study provides empirical evidence of the long-term economic burden associated with UGI bleeding. Interpretation of the results should take into account the lack of available information in claims data that could have an effect on study outcomes, such as particular clinical and disease-specific parameters that are not mitigated by propensity score and comorbidity index matching. In addition, this study is limited by the intensive demographic matching that was done between the two cohorts, which may have eliminated the sickest UGI patients and the healthiest general health-plan population patients.

To examine health care utilization measures indicating which asthma patients are appropriate for inhaled corticosteroid and long-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonist (ICS/LABA) therapy and determine whether two ICS/LABA therapies were initiated in accordance with guidelines.A retrospective cohort study of commercially insured asthma patients agedor =12 years that initiated fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (FSC) or budesonide/formoterol fumarate dihydrate (BFC) combination therapy in 2007 was conducted. Use was considered appropriate if patients met any of the following during a 1-year period before ICS/LABA initiation: ICS or leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) use; an asthma-related emergency department (ED) visit or hospitalization;or =2 oral corticosteroids (OCS) courses; oror =6 short-acting beta(2)-adrenergic agonist (SABA) canisters. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with appropriate ICS/LABA use. Certain limitations inherent to the use of claims data for research apply to this study.Of 24,231 patients who initiated ICS/LABA therapy, 993 received BFC and 23,238 received FSC. Among all patients, 37.6% metor =1 criteria for appropriate use. However, compared with FSC users, BFC users had a significantly higher likelihood of meetingor =1 of these criteria (odds ratio, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.76-2.30; p0.001), and a higher proportion of BFC than FSC patients met 4 of the 5 appropriate use criteria. In total, 58.4% of BFC patients versus 36.7% of FSC patients metor =1 criteria for appropriate use. Other factors associated with appropriate use included age, region, Charlson comorbidity score, number of medications, and prescriber specialty.Fewer than half of all patients fulfilled the specified criteria for being appropriate for ICS/LABA therapy. However, a significantly higher proportion of BFC than FSC users met the criteria for appropriate use of ICS/LABA therapy. These results may suggest a need for improved physician awareness of consensus guidelines for the initiation of ICS/LABA therapy.

Background: Macrolide antibiotics and fluoroquinolones are extensively used in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Objective: This analysis was conducted to compare treatment failure rates and health care utilization and cost outcomes among patients with CAP treated with levo-floxacin (500 or 750 mg) or macrolides (azithromycin, clarithromycin, or erythromycin) in an outpatient setting. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of claims data from a large US health plan. Patients were aged ≥18 years and had a primary diagnosis of CAP that was treated with oral levofloxacin or a macrolide in an outpatient setting (including physicians' offices, outpatient clinics, urgent care centers, and large ambulatory health centers). Patients were followed for 30 days after the index drug date to measure study outcomes. Multivariate regression analysis and a propensity score technique were used to compare rates of treatment failure and CAP-related health care utilization and costs. Two post hoc subgroup analyses were conducted in patients aged ≥50 and ≥65 years. Results: Of the 7526 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 2968 (39.4%) were treated with levofloxacin and 4558 (60.6%) with a macrolide. Unadjusted rates of treatment failure were 21.1% and 22.7% in the levofloxacin and macrolide cohorts, respectively. After adjustment for demographic characteristics, baseline comorbidities, and severity of illness, levofloxacin recipients were significantly less likely to experience treatment failure than macrolide recipients (odds ratio [OR] = 0.84; 95% CI, 0.75-0.94, P = 0.003). The likelihood of treatment failure was significantly lower in levofloxacin recipients aged ≥50 years (OR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.66–0.94; P = 0.007) and ≥65 years (OR = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.43–1.00; P = 0.049) compared with the corresponding subgroups of macrolide recipients. The magnitude of this difference was greatest in the subgroup aged ≥65 years, which had a 35% reduced risk of treatment failure compared with the corresponding group of macrolide-treated patients. The rate of CAP-related emergency department visits was significantly lower among patients receiving levofloxa-cin (OR = 0.68; 95% CI, 0.51–0.91; P = 0.009); there were no differences in CAP-related hospitalizations or total CAP-related health care costs between levofloxa-cin and macrolide recipients. Conclusions: Multivariate-adjusted rates of treatment failure in outpatients with CAP were significantly lower in those treated with levofloxacin relative to those treated with a macrolide. The lower rates of treatment failure with levofloxacin were consistently observed across all patients and in the subgroups aged ≥50 and ≥65 years. Rates of emergency department visits were also significantly lower among levofloxacin-treated patients, whereas overall CAP-related hospitali-zations and costs did not differ significantly between the 2 treatment groups.

Medication adherence is an important component of effective secondary stroke prevention. The objectives of this study were to examine the impact of persistence with two prescription antiplatelet therapies on the outcome of recurrent hospitalized stroke, and to identify the predictors of nonpersistence with these antiplatelet therapies.Administrative claims from a large, geographically diverse US health plan were used to evaluate acetylsalicylic acid / extended-release dipyridamole (ASA/ERDP) treated and clopidogrel treated patients from November 1, 2002 - December 31, 2005 who had an ischemic stroke requiring hospitalization. Nonpersistence was defined as failure to refill index medication within 30 days from the run-out date of the prior prescription. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify key factors associated with time to nonpersistence.Patient demographic variables, clinical characteristics, comorbidities hypothesized to affect the risk of current stroke, stroke outcomes, treatment patterns, and compliance were assessed.A total of 1413 patients hospitalized for ischemic stroke were identified. Mean age was 63.4 years and 44.2% were female. The proportion of patients persistent per person-year was 45.1%. Persistence with medication was significantly associated with a longer time to recurrent hospitalized stroke (HR 0.275; 95% CI 0.134-0.564; p0.0004). A medication copayment of$40 (relative to a copayment ofor =$20) was the only significant factor predicting time to nonpersistence (HR 1.320; 95% CI 1.091-1.596; p0.0042).Persistence with antiplatelet medication within a cohort of hospitalized ischemic stroke patients was associated with a 72.5% lower likelihood of recurrent hospitalized stroke. Higher medication copayment was found to negatively impact patient persistence with antiplatelet therapy. The findings of this study must be considered within the limitations of database analysis, as claims data are collected for the purpose of payment and not research.

National guidelines recommend treating low HDL and/or high triglycerides (TG) with adjunctive therapy that supplements statin monotherapy in patients with multiple cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors. Niacin and fibrates have been shown in clinical trials to be effective as adjunctive therapy for these lipid abnormalities.To evaluate the pharmacologic treatment of low HDL and high TG in real-world practice by assessing a large managed-care population with CVD risk factors enrolled in a commercial health plan.Complete lipid panel results (LDL, HDL, TG) obtained between 1/1/2006 and 12/31/2006 (index lab) were available for all participants. Subjects were observed 180 days pre-index to determine which CVD risk factors were present (male aged 45+, female 55+, coronary heart disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus). Patients whose LDL was at goal but who had low HDL and high TG were assessed for lipid treatment status by evaluating outpatient pharmacy claims 6 months pre- and post-index.Treatment with any lipid therapy increased for all risk groups, and by total risk factors, from pre-index to post-index. Use of fibrates and niacin, alone or in combination with a statin, also increased for all risk groups, and by total risk factors as well, but was below expectations based on guideline recommendations. For example, among patients with 4 risk factors,20% of patients with low HDL/high TG received niacin and/or a fibrate post-index date.Our results indicate that in actual clinical practice, niacin and fibrates are underutilized in the treatment of low HDL and high TG. The findings of this study must be considered within the limitations of database analysis as claims data are collected for the purpose of payment and not research.

To examine adherence to adalimumab (ADA) and etanercept (ETA) and health care costs in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients, and to explore the association between adherence, utilization and costs.Using administrative claims data from a large managed health care plan, RA patients treated with etanercept or adalimumab during the period from 01/01/2005 through 12/31/2005 were identified. The first dispensing date was defined as the index date. Patient adherence and costs were assessed during the 1 year post-index period.Nonadherence (medication possession ratio80%) was modeled using logistic regression. Hazard ratios (HR) comparing time to discontinuation were estimated using Cox proportional hazard (PH) models. Propensity score matching with multivariate generalized linear modeling adjustment was done to assess cost difference between ADA and ETA.Of 3829 eligible RA patients, 1292 (765 existing, 527 naïve) and 2537 (1834 existing, 703 naïve) patients used ADA and ETA, respectively. Compared with ADA users, ETA users had longer average treatment duration (316 vs. 291 days; p0.0001). Unadjusted adherence rates for naïve and existing users were 63% and 70% (ADA), and 65% and 73% (ETA). Logistic regression analysis indicated that compared with ETA users, ADA users were more likely to be nonadherent (OR, naïve 1.24; existing; 1.25). Cox PH models indicated that existing ADA users were more likely to discontinue (HR = 1.11; p = 0.06) their medication than existing ETA users. Compared with ADA users, ETA users had significantly lower RA-related pharmacy costs (naïve: $10,892 vs. $12,534, p0.01; existing: $12,192 vs. $13,752, p0.01) and RA-related total costs (naïve: $11,976.42 vs. $13,511.99, p0.05; existing: $14,031 vs. $15,454, p0.05).ETA users had longer treatment duration, were more likely to adhere to their medication regimen and had lower RA-related pharmacy and RA-related total costs compared with ADA users. These findings must be considered within the limitations of this database analysis.

Purpose Patient flow between primary care physicians and gastroenterologists in the continuum of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) care is poorly understood. Using administrative claims data from a large US health plan linked with data abstracted from medical records, we examined: health care resource utilization for GERD subjects treated by primary care physicians (PCPs) and gastroenterologists (GEs), determinants of GERD subject transfer between these physician types, and reasons for GERD therapy change. Results Within a sample of 169,884 patients, 211,043 PCP-based episodes of care and 40,304 GE-based episodes of care were developed. In unadjusted comparisons, GE episodes were characterized by more endoscopic procedures, on average (50.5/100 episodes), compared with PCP episodes (6.3/100, P

Background To evaluate real-world pharmacologic treatment of mixed dyslipidemia in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Methods All commercial health plan members in a large US managed care database with complete lipid panel results (HDL-C, LDL-C, TG) between 1/1/2006 and 12/31/2006 were identified (N = 529,236). DM patients (N = 53,679) with mixed dyslipidemia were defined as having any 2 suboptimal lipid parameters (N = 28,728). Lipid treatment status 6 months pre- and post-index date was determined using pharmacy claims for any lipid therapy. Results Post-index, 41.1% of DM patients with 2 abnormal lipid parameters and 45.1% with 3 abnormal lipid parameters did not receive lipid-modifying treatment. Post-index treatment rates were 57.4%, 63.6%, and 66.4% for patients with LDL-C, HDL-C, and TG in the most severe quartiles, respectively. Statin monotherapy was the primary lipid-modifying regimen prescribed (54.8% and 47.8% of patients with any 2 and all 3 lipids not at goal, respectively). Less than 30% of treated patients received combination therapy. Conclusion Over 40% of DM patients with mixed dyslipidemia received no lipid-modifying therapy during the follow-up period. Those who were treated were primarily prescribed statin monotherapy. This study suggests that DM patients are not being treated to ADA-suggested targets.

Background To study the prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its impact on allopurinol dosing and uric acid control among patients with gout. Methods This was a retrospective study using data from a large US health plan. Claims and laboratory data were analyzed for enrollees from the health plan database from January 2002 through December 2005. Patients with gout were identified from pharmacy and medical claims data based on the presence of codes for gout medication or gout diagnosis. Severity of CKD was determined using the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Allopurinol titration was defined as a change in average daily dose from first prescription to last prescription of ≥ 50 mg. Results A total of 3,929 patients were identified for inclusion in this study, 39% of whom had CKD (based on having an eGFR < 90 mL/min/1.73 m2). Subjects with CKD were older (p < 0.01) and more likely to be women (p < 0.01), had a greater number of comorbid conditions (p < 0.01), and were more likely to be prescribed allopurinol (p < 0.01) compared to those with no CKD. The average starting dose of allopurinol was lower among those with CKD, and it decreased with worsening kidney function. Among the 3,122 gout patients who used allopurinol, only 25.6% without CKD and 22.2% with CKD achieved a serum uric acid concentration of < 6.0 mg/dL (p = 0.0409). Also, only 15% of allopurinol users had an upward dose titration (by ≥50 mg), but the average increase in dose did not differ significantly between those with and without CKD. Conclusions About two out of every five patients with gout in this population had CKD. Allopurinol doses were not adjusted in the majority of CKD patients. Serum uric acid control in gout was poor among patients without CKD and even worse among those with CKD.