Search

Background: Chemotherapy‐induced anorexia is a common occurrence in patients undergoing treatment for advanced lung cancer. However, the relationship between chemotherapy‐induced anorexia and weight loss during platinum‐based chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors is unclear. This study explored the relationship between chemotherapy‐induced anorexia and therapeutic outcomes in patients with stage IV non‐small‐cell lung cancer undergoing platinum‐based chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Methods: The study retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 106 patients with stage IV non‐small‐cell lung cancer treated with platinum‐based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors between January 2019 and October 2022. The incidence of weight loss and its association with treatment efficacy was assessed in the chemotherapy‐induced anorexia group. Chemotherapy‐induced anorexia, nausea, and vomiting were evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 5.0. Progression‐free and overall survival were used to measure treatment efficacy. Results: Chemotherapy‐induced anorexia was observed in 13.2% of patients. These patients exhibited significant weight loss at 6 and 9 weeks after treatment initiation compared to those in the non‐chemotherapy‐induced anorexia group. Progression‐free and overall survival were shorter in the chemotherapy‐induced anorexia group than in the non‐chemotherapy‐induced anorexia group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: Chemotherapy‐induced anorexia was associated with significant weight loss and reduced treatment efficacy in patients with stage IV non‐small‐cell lung cancer. These results highlight the importance of implementing robust supportive care for chemotherapy‐induced anorexia to mitigate weight loss and uphold treatment effectiveness during platinum‐based chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The efficacy of anti‐CTLA‐4 antibody (ipilimumab) plus anti‐programmed cell death 1 antibody (nivolumab) in treating advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is impeded by an elevated risk of severe immune‐related adverse events. However, our understanding of associations among pre‐existing fibrosis, emphysematous changes, and objective indicators as predictive factors is limited for severe pneumonitis in NSCLC patients receiving this combination therapy. Thus, we retrospectively investigated these associations, including overall tumor burden, before treatment initiation in the Japanese population. Methods: We focused on patients (n = 76) with pre‐existing interstitial lung disease (ILD) to identify predictors of severe pneumonitis. Variables included age, sex, smoking status, programmed cell death ligand 1 expression, overall tumor burden, chest computed tomography‐confirmed fibrosis, serum markers, and respiratory function test results. Results: Severe pneumonitis was more frequent in patients with squamous cell carcinoma, fibrosis, low diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (%DLCO), and high surfactant protein D (SP‐D) level. Notably, squamous cell carcinoma, baseline %DLCO, and SP‐D level were significant risk factors. Our findings revealed the nonsignificance of tumor burden (≥85 mm) in predicting severe pneumonitis, emphasizing the importance of pre‐existing ILD. Conversely, in cases without pre‐existing fibrosis, severe pneumonitis was not associated with %DLCO or SP‐D level (93.2% vs. 91.9%, and 63.3 vs. 40.9 ng/mL, respectively) and was more common in patients with a large overall tumor burden (97.5 vs. 70.0 mm). Conclusion: Vigilant monitoring and early intervention are crucial for patients with squamous cell carcinoma, high SP‐D level, or low %DLCO undergoing ipilimumab plus nivolumab therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Which patients benefit from the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains unclear. There have been few reports on the efficacy of ICIs based on conventional immunohistochemical neuroendocrine (NE) markers (synaptophysin, chromogranin A, and neural cell adhesion molecule [NCAM]). In the present study, we aimed to analyze the relationship between the expression of immunohistochemical NE markers and the efficacy of ICIs in patients with extensive disease (ED)‐SCLC, to assess whether conventional NE markers are predictive of ICIs. Methods: Patients with untreated ED‐SCLC who received first‐line therapy at the Shizuoka Cancer Center between November 2002 and July 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. We evaluated the efficacy of first‐line chemotherapy according to the expression status of each immunohistochemical NE marker in patients treated with ICI plus chemotherapy (ICI‐chemo group) and with chemotherapy alone (chemo group). Results: A total of 227 patients were included in the ICI‐chemo and chemo groups, respectively. The progression‐free survival (PFS) tended to be better in patients in the ICI‐chemo group than those treated with chemotherapy alone in patients with NE marker‐positive SCLC. In particular, it was statistically significant in patients with chromogranin A‐positive SCLC (p = 0.036). In patients with NE marker‐negative SCLC, no significant differences were observed in PFS between the two groups. There were no significant differences in overall survival (OS), regardless of the expression of any conventional NE marker. Conclusion: Our study suggests that the efficacy of ICIs in addition to chemotherapy may be poor in patients with NE marker‐negative SCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Amrubicin (AMR) regimens have shown efficacy as second‐line treatment in patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC); however, adverse events such as febrile neutropenia (FN) sometimes preclude their use. Further, the safety and efficacy of AMR with primary prophylactic pegfilgrastim (P‐PEG) have not been sufficiently evaluated. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of AMR with or without P‐PEG as second‐line chemotherapy for SCLC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with SCLC who received AMR as second‐line chemotherapy at Shizuoka Cancer Center, between December 2014 and November 2021. Based on presence/absence of P‐PEG in their regimen, patients (n = 60) were divided into P‐PEG (n = 21) and non‐P‐PEG groups, and their clinical outcomes were evaluated. Results: Median of AMR treatment cycles was five (range: 1–39 cycles) in P‐PEG group and four (range: 1–15 cycles) in non‐P‐PEG group. The incidence of FN (4.8% vs. 30.8%; p = 0.02) and AMR dose reduction because of adverse events (4.8% vs. 25.6%; p = 0.08) were lower in the P‐PEG group than in the non‐P‐PEG group. The objective response rates were 52.4% and 30.8%, and median progression‐free and overall survival were 4.7 and 3.0 months, and 9.6 and 6.8 months, in the P‐PEG and non‐P‐PEG groups, respectively. Conclusions: AMR with P‐PEG as second‐line chemotherapy for SCLC reduced the incidence of FN at a maintained AMR dose intensity and was associated with favorable tumor responses and survival outcomes. P‐PEG should be considered for patients treated with AMR for SCLC including refractory relapsed SCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Pembrolizumab treatment is associated with a favorable prognosis in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we investigated the associations among pre-treatment clinical factors, baseline overall tumor burden, and development of severe immune-related adverse events (irAEs; grade ≥ 3) after pembrolizumab treatment with or without chemotherapy. We retrospectively examined consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC who received pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy at Hakodate Goryoukaku Hospital from March 2017 to February 2021. The baseline overall tumor burden was measured as the sum of the unidimensional diameters of up to five target lesions. We defined irAEs as toxicities related to immune checkpoint inhibitors based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. Tumor burden differed significantly between patients with and without severe irAEs (85 vs. 65 mm, p = 0.0367). The cutoff value for overall tumor burden was set to 80 mm. Good performance status (PS = 0) and PD-L1 expression > 80%, but not overall tumor burden, were correlated with severe irAEs, regardless of complementary chemotherapy. The multivariate odds ratios of good PS and high PD-L1 expression for severe irAEs were 3.27 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.22–8.77, p = 0.019) and 4.44 (95% CI: 1.59–12.42, p = 0.0044), respectively. Baseline overall tumor burden, good PS, and high PD-L1 expression were associated with severe irAEs in patients with NSCLC treated with first-line pembrolizumab with or without chemotherapy. Patients with these factors should be carefully monitored to prevent irAEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Compared to chemotherapy alone, monoclonal antibodies like ipilimumab and nivolumab, with or without chemotherapy, improve the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), albeit with a higher incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) than those with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy. Therefore, we aimed to investigate if baseline overall tumor burden was associated with the development of Grade ≥ 3 irAEs (severe irAEs) when treated with first-line ipilimumab plus nivolumab with or without chemotherapy. We retrospectively examined consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab with or without chemotherapy at Hakodate Goryoukaku Hospital between December 2020 and December 2021. Baseline overall tumor burden was measured as the sum of unidimensional diameters of up to five target lesions according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. We defined irAEs as ICI therapy-related toxicities according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0. A significant difference in tumor burden was observed between patients with and without severe irAEs (100 mm vs. 67.5 mm, p = 0.001). We evaluated various clinical parameters, including baseline overall tumor burden, before treatment initiation. Of the various parameters, only high tumor burden correlated with severe irAEs, independent of complementary chemotherapy. The multivariate odds ratio of severe irAEs and high tumor burden was 6.62. Conclusively, baseline overall tumor burden may be a risk factor for severe irAEs in patients treated with first-line combination ICI therapy. Therefore, patients with large tumor burden should be carefully monitored to prevent irAEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]