Search

Background Approximately 25% of outpatient antibiotic prescriptions are unnecessary among family physicians in Canada. Minimizing unnecessary antibiotics is key for community antibiotic stewardship. However, unnecessary antibiotic prescribing is much harder to measure than total antibiotic prescribing. We investigated the association between total and unnecessary antibiotic use by family physicians and evaluated inter-physician variability in unnecessary antibiotic prescribing. Methods This was a cohort study based on electronic medical records of family physicians in Ontario, Canada, between April 2011 and March 2016. We used predefined expected antibiotic prescribing rates for 23 common primary care conditions to calculate unnecessary antibiotic prescribing rates. We used multilevel Poisson regression models to evaluate the association between total antibiotic volume (number of antibiotic prescriptions per patient visit), adjusted for multiple practice- and physician-level covariates, and unnecessary antibiotic prescribing. Results There were 499 570 physician–patient encounters resulting in 152 853 antibiotic prescriptions from 341 physicians. Substantial inter-physician variability was observed. In the fully adjusted model, we observed a significant association between total antibiotic volume and unnecessary prescribing rate (adjusted rate ratio 2.11 per 10% increase in total use; 95% CI 2.05–2.17), and none of the practice- and physician-level variables were associated with unnecessary prescribing rate. Conclusions We demonstrated substantial inter-physician variability in unnecessary antibiotic prescribing in this cohort of family physicians. Total antibiotic use was strongly correlated with unnecessary antibiotic prescribing. Total antibiotic volume is a reasonable surrogate for unnecessary antibiotic use. These results can inform community antimicrobial stewardship efforts. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: C‐reactive protein (CRP) has limited placental transportability. Relying on CRP level in umbilical cord blood alone is an inaccurate way to predict early onset neonatal sepsis, and we retrospectively reviewed the clinical courses of neonates with elevated CRP in umbilical cord blood. Methods: This study was a retrospective case review of neonates with elevated CRP in umbilical cord blood (>0.5 mg/dL) in the Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, Nara, Japan between February 2013 and August 2017. We investigated the association of maternal and neonatal factors with neonatal clinical course. Then, we compared the cases of neonates with and without elevated CRP in umbilical cord blood. Results: The subjects consisted of a total of 22 neonates with elevated CRP in umbilical cord blood and 344 neonates without elevated CRP in umbilical cord blood. Of the 22 neonates with elevated CRP, 18 had some symptoms of sepsis at birth, but the symptoms of 85% of the symptomatic patients resolved ≤24 h after birth. Two neonates with elevated CRP in umbilical cord blood had bacteremia, and they had poor prognoses. Elevated CRP in umbilical cord blood was associated with length of antimicrobials (P = 0.021), immature/total neutrophil ratio (P = 0.017), and pathological chorioamnionitis (CAM; P = 0.028) on multivariable logistic regression analysis. Conclusion: Elevated CRP in umbilical cord blood was associated with pathological CAM. Most symptoms of sepsis resolved <24 h after birth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Active surveillance culture (ASC) in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) has been implemented to monitor horizontal transmission and choose appropriate antimicrobials when neonates experience late-onset infections (LOIs). To perform a cost analysis of ASC in the NICU, we evaluated data from a NICU ward in a Japanese community hospital. This was a retrospective study of neonates admitted to the NICU of Nara Prefecture General Medical Center, Nara City, Japan, from April 2012 to May 2017. We implemented biweekly ASC (nasal, stool and umbilical cultures) during this period. We assessed the detection rate for methicillin-sensitive and -resistant S. aureus (MSSA and MRSA) in each culture and reviewed the cases of LOI. Among the 785 cases, MSSA and MRSA were detected in 158 and 75 cases, respectively. Nasal culture was the most sensitive method for detecting MSSA and MRSA. Three cases benefitted from changing the empiric treatment based on previous ASC results, with an annual cost of ¥808,331 (£5773.80 or $7282.30) for ASC. The total cost per one benefited case during the study period was calculated as ¥1,392,126 (£9943.80 or $12,541.70). The total cost per benefited case in risk factor targeted ASC, nasal culture targeted ASC and MRSA-targeted ASC was ¥1,332,264 (£9516.20 or $12,002.30), ¥692,222 (£4944.40 or $6236.20) and ¥858,547 (£6132.50 or $7734.70), respectively. Considering the frequency of S. aureus detection and the cost of each culture, our ASC was modified to use only nasal cultures. This study suggests that the cost performance of ASC should be evaluated with consideration of the characteristics of each NICU. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Routine catheter tip cultures are not recommended because some cases of colonization, such as with Staphylococcus aureus, can lead to subsequent bacteremia. To evaluate the safety of colonization without antimicrobial treatment, as well as the effectiveness of routine catheter tip cultures in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), we performed a retrospective data analysis in a Japanese community hospital. Methods: We reviewed all peripherally inserted central venous catheter tip culture results from the NICU ward between April 2012 and June 2017 and noted outcome (i.e. antimicrobial treatment or subsequent infection). We then performed a cost analysis for routine catheter tip culturing on patients who were symptom free during the study period. Results: Of the 93 positive cases in 80 patients from 1,051 catheter tip cultures, seven patients had suspected infection and were treated with antimicrobials. The other 73 symptom‐free, positive patients had no subsequent or exacerbated symptoms indicative of an infection, and did not have antimicrobial treatment. The total cost for catheter tip culturing during the study period was ¥548 731. After excluding patients with symptoms of infection at the time of culture, the efficacy of routine catheter tip cultures on symptom‐free patients was estimated to be zero. Conclusion: Symptom‐free colonization did not affect clinician management in this study, and all colonized patients without suspected infection were safely managed without antimicrobials. Furthermore, routine catheter tip culturing was not cost‐effective; therefore, this practice may be no longer recommended in the NICU. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]