Search

This study aims to compare short-term functional outcomes and conversion rates to reverse shoulder arthroplasty between patients who underwent total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) using a modular metal-backed glenoid component, a hybrid glenoid component, and an all-polyethylene component. A retrospective review of individuals undergoing TSA between October 2014 and December 2020 was performed. Inclusion criteria included patients undergoing primary TSA for osteoarthritis during this time frame by 1 surgeon. Preoperative and postoperative variables included demographic information, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), and range of motion. Revision rates were also documented. Summary statistics were performed, using a 1-way analysis of variance with Tukey post hoc pairwise comparisons when the outcome reached significance. Fifty-two patients were included with age averaging 68 ± 8.1 years, with body mass index of 31 ± 5.8. 54% of patients were female with 12% having diabetes and only 2% were smokers. Follow-up averaged 42 months with patients undergoing metal-backed glenoid having longer follow-up at 56.5 months (P <.001). ASES, forward elevation, and external rotation (ER) for every implant type improved significantly postoperatively (P <.001) besides internal rotation and ER within the poly group (P =.072). No difference was found between the 3 groups for preoperative and postoperative ASES scores, forward elevation, internal rotation, and ER (P >.05). Two patients within the poly group required revision due to rotator cuff tear (P =.225). At 2 years, functional outcomes and patient-reported outcomes are similar in all 3 glenoid groups. There were slightly higher revision rates within the all-polyethylene group. If outcomes are similar among all groups, modular implant systems may be favorable to make conversion to revision TSA easier. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Previous studies about antibiotic prophylaxis in foot and ankle surgery have focused on perioperative intravenous administration, with few studies reporting on the efficiency of postoperative oral antibiotics. The purpose of this study is to investigate differences in the rate of postoperative infection and wound complications between patients with and without postoperative oral antibiotics and to identify independent risk factors for these complications following foot and ankle surgeries. Methods: A retrospective review of all elective foot and ankle surgeries with at least a 6-month follow-up was performed over a 2-year time span. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on if they received postoperative oral antibiotics. We compared the rates of postoperative infections and wound complications between the 2 groups. The surgical site, the number of Current Procedural Terminology codes, and the number of surgical incisions were also noted. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors of postoperative infection and wound complications. Results: A total of 366 patients were included in this study--240 with antibiotics and 126 without antibiotics. There was no significant difference in the rates of postoperative infection and wound complications between the 2 groups. The rate of superficial infection, deep infection, and wound complications was 1.7%, 0.8%, and 5.8% in the antibiotic group vs 3.2%, 0.0%, and 4.0% in patients without antibiotics, respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified independent risk factors of postoperative infection and wound complications as follows: smoking (OR: 4.7), male (OR: 4.0), history of neoplasm (OR: 6.7), and multiple incisions (OR: 4.1). Conclusion: Our results suggest that routine postoperative prophylactic oral antibiotics are not needed following elective foot and ankle surgeries. However, certain risk factors may increase the risk for postoperative infection and wound complications in foot and ankle surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]