Search

Access site-related vascular complications are common complications of trans- catheter aortic valve replacement. In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of prophylactic cannulation of the ipsilateral distal femoral artery in the management of access site-related vascular complications.One hundred sixty-four patients, who were evaluated by the Heart Team of our institution and found eligible for transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedure between January 2016 and August 2019, were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the management of peripheral complications. The antegrade crossover was used as bailout treatment in the first 70 patients. Prophylactic cannulation of the ipsilateral distal femoral artery was performed in the last 94 patients. These 2 groups were compared.Peripheral complications developed in 15 of the first 70 patients included in the study. The percutaneous intervention was unsuccessful in 4 of the patients who underwent bailout antegrade crossover. Peripheral complications developed in 14 of the last 94 patients in whom prophylactic cannulation of the ipsilateral distal femoral artery was performed, and all these patients were managed successfully with percutaneous intervention.Prophylactic cannulation of the ipsilateral distal femoral artery is a simple, effec- tive, and safe method in the management of access site-related vascular complications.

Studies reported conflicting results on the effect of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) blocker use on acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing elective coronary angiography but association in elderly patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is not known. Also, there are limited data on the effect of inflammatory markers on AKI. We aimed to investigate the effects of RAAS blocker pretreatment and inflammatory markers on AKI in this population. A total of 471 patients were compared according to presence of RAAS blocker pretreatment at admission. Conventional and inverse probability weighed conditional logistic regression were used to determine independent predictors of AKI. Mean age of the study group was 75.4 ± 7.1 years and 29.1% of the patients were female. AKI was observed in 17.2% of the study population. Weighted conditional multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that AKI was associated with baseline creatinine levels and C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) (OR 2.08, 95% CI = 1.13-3.82, p = .02 and OR 1.19, 95% CI = 1.01-1.41, p = .04, respectively). No significant association was found between RAAS blocker pretreatment and AKI. CAR and elevated baseline creatinine levels were independent predictors of AKI in this patient group.

High-intensity statin (HIS) therapy is widely recommended for secondary prevention after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). The 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) dyslipidemia guidelines have lowered the target low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level, which necessitates a more frequent use of nonstatin therapies.The objectives of the study were to investigate the rate of LDL-C target attainment for secondary prevention in AMI patients.This retrospective investigation included 1360 patients diagnosed with AMI in a tertiary heart center. Lipid parameters were collected within 24 h of admission and within 1 year after discharge. The medications used were retrieved from medical records, and the lowest LDL-C levels after statin treatment were used to assess the effectiveness of the therapy. LDL-C target attainment was defined according to the 2016 ESC/EAS dyslipidemia guidelines as an LDL-C level of70 mg/dL and a ≥ 50% reduction from baseline. In addition, the rate of LDL-C target attainment according to the 2019 fromESC/EAS guidelines was defined as an LDL-C level of55 mg/dL and a ≥ 50% reduction baseline.In total, 502 (36.9%) and 247 (18.2%) patients reached the LDL-C targets according to the 2016 and 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines, respectively. The admission LDL-C levels were significantly lower and HIS treatment was used more frequently in patients who subsequently attained the LDL-C goal. Remarkably, 461 (34%) patients failed to reach the LDL-C goals despite HIS treatment. Only 27 (1.9%) patients were prescribed ezetimibe.The rate of LDL-C goal attainment in AMI patients was low, which indicates the need for combination statin and non-statin lipid-lowering therapies.