1. SHORT-TERM REACTIVATION OF RETINOPATHY OF PREMATURITY AFTER PRIMARY RANIBIZUMAB TREATMENT.
- Author
-
Strawbridge J, Cheng JY, Gundlach BS, Gillespie T, Karmouta R, Khitri M, Chu A, and Tsui I
- Subjects
- Humans, Retrospective Studies, Male, Female, Infant, Newborn, Risk Factors, Recurrence, Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A antagonists & inhibitors, Follow-Up Studies, Infant, Time Factors, Retinopathy of Prematurity drug therapy, Retinopathy of Prematurity physiopathology, Retinopathy of Prematurity diagnosis, Ranibizumab administration & dosage, Ranibizumab adverse effects, Intravitreal Injections, Angiogenesis Inhibitors administration & dosage, Angiogenesis Inhibitors adverse effects, Gestational Age
- Abstract
Purpose: Investigate risk factors for short-term reactivation of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) after intravitreal ranibizumab (IVR) therapy and determine safety and efficacy of repeat injections., Methods: Retrospective chart review study of patients screened for ROP as inpatients between 2013 and 2023 who received IVR within the UCLA health care system. Primary outcomes were rates and timing of short-term ROP reactivation, defined as repeat worsening of ROP to stage 2 or 3 before 52 weeks postmenstrual age, as well as risk factors for reactivation. Other outcomes included adverse events and rates of reactivation after a second intravitreal injection., Results: Eighty-two eyes of 43 patients received primary IVR 0.25 mg/0.025 cc for type 1 ROP. Thirteen patients (22 eyes) (30.2% of patients, 26.8% of eyes) developed short-term reactivation an average of 7.2 weeks ± 1.7 weeks after treatment. Increased reactivation risk was associated with zone I disease (odds ratio 6.23, 95% CI, 1.35-28.7, P = 0.019), lower postmenstrual age at first injection (odds ratio 1.64, 95% CI, 1.19-2.26; P = 0.003), and lower gestational age at birth (odds ratio 1.80, 95% CI, 1.04-3.13, P = 0.037). Of the 13 patients that received repeat injections, five required laser treatment for a second reactivation (11.6% of patients receiving IVR). No eyes developed retinal vascular occlusion, endophthalmitis, or cataract., Conclusion: Repeat injections may be required after primary IVR for aggressive ROP. Repeat IVR treatment for ROP is effective and poses few ophthalmic adverse events, although additional reactivation remains a risk.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF