Search

Objective: To assess the efficacy of rotigotine transdermal patch in subjects with moderate to severe idiopathic restless legs syndrome (RLS) and periodic limb movement (PLM) in sleep in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter study (NCT00275236)., Methods: Sixty-seven (46 rotigotine, 21 placebo) subjects applied rotigotine (maximum 3mg/24h) or placebo patches once-daily during a 4-week maintenance period; efficacy evaluations used polysomnographic measures and clinician/patient ratings., Results: Mean PLM index (PLMI; PLM/h time in bed) decreased more with rotigotine (50.9/h to 8.1/h) than with placebo (37.4/h to 27.1/h; adjusted treatment ratio 4.25 (95% CI [2.48,7.28], p<0.0001). PLM during sleep with arousal index (PLMSAI; 8.57/h to 2.47/h under rotigotine, 6.5/h to 4.95/h under placebo; adjusted treatment difference: -3.12 (95% CI [-5.36, -0.88], p=0.0072) also improved more under rotigotine. At end of maintenance, 39% of rotigotine subjects had PLMI levels <5/h and 26% showed no RLS symptoms (IRLS=0), whereas no placebo subject met these criteria. Common drug-related adverse events for rotigotine and placebo included nausea (21.7%/4.8%), headache (17.4%/14.3%), application site reactions (17.4%/4.8%), and somnolence (10.9%/9.5%); most were mild to moderate in intensity., Conclusions: Rotigotine transdermal patch was efficacious and well tolerated in the short-term treatment of RLS motor symptoms and associated sleep disturbances.

The aim of the present placebo-controlled sleep laboratory study was to compare the acute effects of gabapentin (GBT) and ropinirole (ROP) in restless legs syndrome (RLS). In a parallel-group design, 40 RLS patients received 300 mg GBT and another 40 patients 0.5 mg ROP as compared with placebo. Polysomnographic and psychometric measures were obtained in three sleep laboratory nights (screening/placebo/drug). Statistics included a Wilcoxon test for differences between drug and placebo and a U test for inter-group differences. Sleep efficiency and latency were found significantly improved after GBT, while they remained unchanged after ROP, with significant inter-drug differences. Sleep architecture showed oppositional changes after the two drugs: While GBT decreased S1, increased slow-wave sleep and SREM and shortened REM latency, ROP increased S2, decreased slow-wave sleep and SREM and increased REM latency. Periodic leg movements (PLM) showed a significantly greater decrease after ROP (-73%) than after GBT (-35%). Subjective sleep quality improved significantly only after GBT; mental performance improved after both drugs with no inter-drug differences. In conclusion, the dopamine agonist ROP showed acute therapeutic efficacy with regard to PLM measures only, whereas GBT had a less pronounced effect on these measures, but improved objective and subjective sleep and awakening quality as compared with both placebo and ROP. Differential acute drug effects may serve as prognostic indicators of therapeutic response of individual patients.

Background: In a pilot placebo-controlled study, low dosages of 0.5-2mg/24h rotigotine showed a dose-dependent beneficial effect in restless legs syndrome (RLS) patients., Methods: Efficacy and safety of the dopamine agonist rotigotine, formulated as a once-daily transdermal system (patch), was investigated for five fixed dosages and compared to placebo in patients with idiopathic RLS in a double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter, six-week dose-finding trial. Primary efficacy measure was the total score of the International RLS Severity Scale (IRLS); in addition, the RLS-6 scales and the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) were administered., Results: Of 371 enrolled patients, 341 patients (mean age 58+/-10years, 67% females) were randomized. The IRLS total score improved between baseline and end of the six-week treatment period by -10.6 (0.5mg/24h rotigotine; patch area 2.5cm2), -15.1 (1mg/24h; 5cm2), -15.7 (2mg/24h; 10cm2), -17.5 (3mg/24h; 15cm2), and -14.8 (4mg/24h, 20cm2) as compared to placebo (-9.2). The hierarchical statistical test procedure demonstrated superiority of rotigotine over placebo for 4mg/24h, 3mg/24h, 2mg/24h, and 1mg/24h, with p-values of 0.0013, <0.0001, 0.0003, and 0.0004, respectively. Only the 0.5mg/24h dose was not different compared to placebo (p=0.2338). The CGI and the RLS-6 severity items supported the efficacy of the rotigotine doses beyond 0.5mg/24h. The most frequent side effects were application site reactions and nausea and tended to be more frequent with higher doses., Conclusions: This dose-finding trial identified the range for a maintenance dose of rotigotine from 1mg/24h to 3mg/24h. The lowest dose was ineffective and, with the highest dose, no additional benefit was observed.

Unlabelled: Patients with somatoform pain often complain of sleep disorders, but sleep disorders are not an integrated part of the diagnosis of this disorder. Restless legs syndrome is associated with painful symptoms and sleep disturbances. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prevalence of restless legs syndrome (RLS) in somatoform pain disorder., Method: In this study 100 consecutive patients (mean age: 46.4; SD: 11.4; women: 58) diagnosed with somatoform pain disorder (SPD) were clinically investigated for the occurrence of RLS at the behavioral medicine clinic for pain outpatients in the department of psychiatry within the Medical University of Vienna. The pain parameters of SPD were assessed using a pain questionnaire and visual analogue scales (VAS). The severity of RLS was established using the questionnaire of the International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group (IRLSSG)., Results: The prevalence of restless legs syndrome found in somatoform pain disorder was 42%. Interrupted sleep was found in 83.3% in somatoform pain disorder with comorbid RLS and in 64.1% in somatoform pain disorder without RLS. Patients with continuous somatoform pain had a significant higher occurrence of RLS (Sample: 55%; with RLS: 71.4% and without RLS: 43.1%). The pain parameters increased parallel to the severity of RLS. Additionally, RLS was associated with higher psychosocial disability in family life., Conclusions: The prevalence of RLS is high in our sample of patients with somatoform pain disorder. There seems to be a difference in pain profile between patients with and without RLS. RLS may increase the pain level and prolong pain in somatoform pain disorder. RLS should be considered when a somatoform pain disorder is diagnosed.

Dopaminergic agents such as ropinirole are the drugs of first choice in treating restless legs syndrome (RLS). Recently, gabapentin, a structural analogue of gamma-aminobutyric acid, has also been shown to improve sensorimotor symptoms in RLS. Therefore, the tolerability and efficacy of randomized treatment with either gabapentin or ropinirole in patients with idiopathic RLS was evaluated in this 4-week open clinical trial. Patients with idiopathic RLS were treated with either 300 mg of gabapentin (n = 8) or 0.5 mg of ropinirole (n = 8) as the initial dose, and the dose was up-titrated until relief of symptoms was achieved (gabapentin mean dosage 800 +/- 397 mg, range 300-1,200 mg; ropinirole mean dosage 0.78 +/- 0.47 mg, range 0.25-1.50 mg). In both groups, International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group questionnaire scores improved significantly (p < or = 0.018), whereas the scores of the Epworth sleepiness scale remained unchanged within normal limits. Polysomnographic data showed a reduction of periodic leg movements during sleep (PLMS; p < 0.03) and PLMS index (p < 0.02) in both groups. Side effects were only mild and mostly transient. After 6-10 months of follow-up, in most patients, RLS symptoms were still improved. We conclude that gabapentin and ropinirole provide a similarly well-tolerated and effective treatment of PLMS and sensorimotor symptoms in patients with idiopathic RLS., (Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel)

Restless legs syndrome (RLS) is a sensorimotor movement and sleep disorder with a high prevalence. While the sleep disturbance due to RLS has been studied quite well polysomnographically, little is known about the electrophysiological function during daytime. The aim of the present study was to investigate the diurnal quantitative EEG and clinical symptomatology in 33 drug-free RLS patients as compared with age- and sex-matched normal controls. Investigations comprised brain mapping of the vigilance-controlled EEG as well as completion of the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale, the Zung Self-Rating Anxiety Scale, the Quality of Life Index, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and the Epworth Sleepiness Scale for evaluation of clinical symptomatology. Statistical analysis demonstrated an increase in absolute delta and absolute and relative alpha-2 power, a decrease in absolute and relative alpha-1 power, an acceleration of the dominant frequency and the alpha centroid, and a slowing of the delta/theta centroid, as well as a non-significant attenuation in total power. These findings are characteristic of dissociated vigilance changes described in depression. Indeed, RLS patients demonstrated significantly higher depression and anxiety scores, lower quality of life and deteriorated sleep quality. The score of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale was not elevated, in contrast to the increased daytime sleepiness observed in other highly prevalent organic sleep disorders (e.g. sleep apnea). In conclusion, daytime EEG mapping revealed neurophysiological correlates of depression in RLS, which was confirmed by self-ratings at the symptomatological level.