Search

We set out to evaluate salivary cotinine concentrations to judge tobacco smoke exposure among infants and children, and to examine the results in relation to age and wheezing. This was a case-control study of wheezing children (n = 165) and children without respiratory tract symptoms (n = 106) who were enrolled in the Pediatric Emergency Department at the University of Virginia. The age range of both wheezing and control patients was 2 months to 16 years. Questionnaires were combined with cotinine assays in saliva to evaluate exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) for each child. The prevalence of exposure to one or more smokers at home was high (68%); and 43% of the children enrolled were exposed to ETS from their mothers. According to the questionnaires, and after adjusting for age and race, a wheezing child in this study was more likely than a control to be exposed to at least one smoker at home (odds ratio = 1.9; 95% CI = 1.1-3.4). However, the odds of exposure to ETS from smoking mothers did not differ significantly between wheezing and control patients, and no significant association was found between the presence of wheezing and salivary cotinine levels. Among children exposed to ETS at home, cotinine levels were significantly higher in saliva from those under the age of two years, and from toddlers aged 2 and 3 years, compared to values from children over age 4 years. Moreover, the number of smokers in the home strongly influenced cotinine levels from children under age 4 years. In addition, higher cotinine levels were observed in saliva from children under age 2 years who were exposed to ETS from their mothers. Cotinine levels were similar and significantly correlated in paired samples of saliva and serum from children under 4 years of age (n = 54), (r = 0.92, P < 0.001). Based on information gathered from questionnaires, the results indicate that wheezing children were more likely than controls to be exposed to ETS at home. However, significant differences in ETS exposure between wheezing and control groups with respect to maternal smoke exposure or comparisons of salivary cotinine levels were not apparent. It was clear that determinations of salivary cotinine for monitoring the prevalence and intensity of household smoke exposure in this study were most valuable during the first 4 years of life., (Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

This cross-sectional emergency department study of 70 wheezing children and 59 control subjects (2 mo to 16 yr of age) examined the prevalence of respiratory viruses and their relationship to age, atopic status, and eosinophil markers. Nasal washes were cultured for respiratory viruses, assayed for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) antigen, and tested for coronavirus and rhinovirus RNA using reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). Also evaluated were eosinophil numbers and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in both nasal washes and serum, along with total IgE and specific IgE antibody in serum. Respiratory viruses were detected in 82% (18 of 22) of wheezing infants younger than 2 yr of age and in 83% (40 of 48) of older wheezing children. The predominant pathogens were RSV in infants (detected in 68% of wheezing subjects) and rhinovirus in older wheezing children (71%), and both were strongly associated with wheezing (p < 0.005). RSV was largely limited to wheezing children younger than 24 mo of age, but rhinovirus was detected by RT-PCR in 41% of all infants and in 35% of nonwheezing control subjects older than 2 yr of age. After 2 yr of age the strongest odds for wheezing were observed among those who had a positive RT-PCR test for rhinovirus together with a positive serum radioallergosorbent testing (RAST), nasal eosinophilia, or elevated nasal ECP (odds ratios = 17, 21, and 25, respectively). Results from this study demonstrate that a large majority of emergent wheezing illnesses during childhood (2 to 16 yr of age) can be linked to infection with rhinovirus, and that these wheezing attacks are most likely in those who have rhinovirus together with evidence of atopy or eosinophilic airway inflammation.

Objective: To compare eosinophil counts and concentrations of eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) in serum and nasal wash fluid from wheezing infants and children with those from age-matched children without respiratory tract symptoms., Design: A case-control study of 71 children treated for wheezing and 59 control subjects in the University of Virginia Pediatric Emergency Department. The patients ranged from 2 months to 16 years of age. Eosinophil numbers and ECP concentrations were assessed in serum and nasal washes. Total serum IgE was measured and the radioallergosorbent test was used to measure IgE antibody to common inhalant allergens., Results: Among children less than the age of 2 years, markedly elevated levels of ECP (> 200 ng/ml) were measured in nasal washes from 9 (41%) of 22 wheezing patients and 1 (6%) of 17 control subjects (p < 0.03). None of these children had a positive radioallergosorbent test result for IgE antibody to common aeroallergens or a nasal smear containing 10% eosinophils. Few of the wheezing children under 2 years of age had either increased concentrations of total IgE or ECP in their serum or an elevated total blood eosinophil count. After the age of 2 years, the percentage of patients with nasal ECP levels greater than 200 ng/ml was also significantly higher in wheezing children than in control subjects (p < 0.001), and a positive correlation was observed between ECP concentrations in their nasal washes and other eosinophil responses (total blood eosinophil counts, serum ECP levels, and nasal eosinophil counts)., Conclusion: Increased concentrations of ECP were detected in nasal washes from wheezing infants and children, indicating that eosinophils may contribute to the pathogenesis of airway inflammation in some children who wheeze early in life.