Search

Purpose: To evaluate the effectiveness of a home-based inspiratory muscle training (IMT) programme using multiple inspiratory muscle tests., Method: Sixty-eight patients (37 M) with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (Mean [SD], FEV1 36.1 [13.6]% pred.; FEV1/FVC 35.7 [11.2]%) were randomised into an experimental or control group and trained with a threshold loading device at intensity >30% maximum inspiratory pressure (PImax) or <15% PImax, respectively, for 7 weeks. Thirty-nine patients (23 M) completed the study. The following measures were assessed pre- and post-IMT: PImax, sniff inspiratory nasal pressure (SNIP), diaphragm contractility (Pdi,tw), incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT), respiratory muscle endurance (RME), chronic respiratory disease questionnaire (CRDQ), the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) and the SF-36. Between-group changes were assessed using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA)., Results: PImax and perception of well-being improved significantly post-IMT [p = 0.04 and <0.05 in four domains, respectively]. This was not reflected in SNIP [p = 0.7], Pdi,tw [p = 0.8], RME [p = 0.9] or ISWT [p = 0.5]., Conclusions: A seven-week, community-based IMT programme, with realistic use of health-care resources, improves PImax and perception of well-being but a different design may be required for improvement in other measures. Multiple tests provide a more comprehensive evaluation of changes in muscle function post-IMT., Implications for Rehabilitation: A seven-week, home-based inspiratory muscle training programme improves maximal inspiratory pressure and perception of well-being in patients with moderate to severe COPD but not sniff nasal inspiratory pressure or diaphragm contractility, respiratory muscle endurance and exercise capacity. Multiple tests are recommended for a more comprehensive assessment of changes in muscle function following inspiratory muscle training programmes. Therapists need to explore different community-based inspiratory muscle training regimes for COPD patients and identify the optimal exercise protocol that is likely to lead to improvements in diaphragm contractility and exercise capacity.

Background: Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP) is a non-invasive measure of inspiratory muscle function often used as an outcome measure in clinical studies. An initial period of familiarisation with the test is recommended to minimise the learning effect. The repeatability of SNIP in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is currently unknown., Objectives: The aim of this study was to assess the between-session repeatability of SNIP over a 3-week period in moderate-to-severe COPD patients and compare it with that of maximal inspiratory (PI max) and expiratory pressure (PE max)., Methods: Twenty-one patients (13 males) with a mean forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of 38% of predicted (SD: 15) and FEV1/forced vital capacity of 34.3% (SD: 10.4) performed SNIP and PI max and PE max manoeuvres on 3 different sessions (S1, S2 and S3) 3-7 days apart. SNIP was performed at functional residual capacity (FRC), and PI max was performed at FRC and at residual volume (RV) to explore volume-dependent differences in the learning effect between sessions and PE max from total lung capacity., Results: The intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for SNIP was the highest of the three measures: S1-S3 ICC (95% CI) SNIP: 0.96 (0.88-0.94); PI max at FRC 0.82 (0.63-0.92); PI max at RV: 0.89 (0.78-0.95), and PE max: 0.96 (0.92-0.98), and had the lowest mean change between sessions [mean S2 - S1: 2.1(p = 0.4) and S3 - S2: -0.3 (p = 0.9)]., Conclusions: SNIP is repeatable over a period of 3 weeks in medically stable, moderate-to-severe COPD patients. In our study, 2 sessions were adequate to learn how to perform the test., (© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: Respiratory muscle weakness is an important clinical problem. Tests of varying complexity and invasiveness are available to assess respiratory muscle strength. The relative precision of different tests in the detection of weakness is less clear, as is the value of multiple tests., Methods: The respiratory muscle function tests of clinical referrals who had multiple tests assessed in our laboratories over a 6-year period were analysed. Thresholds for weakness for each test were determined from published and in-house laboratory data. The patients were divided into three groups: those who had all relevant measurements of global inspiratory muscle strength (group A, n = 182), those with full assessment of diaphragm strength (group B, n = 264) and those for whom expiratory muscle strength was fully evaluated (group C, n = 60). The diagnostic outcome of each inspiratory, diaphragm and expiratory muscle test, both singly and in combination, was studied and the impact of using more than one test to detect weakness was calculated., Results: The clinical referrals were primarily for the evaluation of neuromuscular diseases and dyspnoea of unknown cause. A low maximal inspiratory mouth pressure (Pimax) was recorded in 40.1% of referrals in group A, while a low sniff nasal pressure (Sniff Pnasal) was recorded in 41.8% and a low sniff oesophageal pressure (Sniff Poes) in 37.9%. When assessing inspiratory strength with the combination of all three tests, 29.6% of patients had weakness. Using the two non-invasive tests (Pimax and Sniff Pnasal) in combination, a similar result was obtained (low in 32.4%). Combining Sniff Pdi (low in 68.2%) and Twitch Pdi (low in 67.4%) reduced the diagnoses of patients with diaphragm weakness to 55.3% in group B. 38.3% of the patients in group C had expiratory muscle weakness as measured by maximum expiratory pressure (Pemax) compared with 36.7% when weakness was diagnosed by cough gastric pressure (Pgas), and 28.3% when assessed by Twitch T10. Combining all three expiratory muscle tests reduced the number of patients diagnosed as having expiratory muscle weakness to 16.7%., Conclusion: The use of single tests such as Pimax, Pemax and other available individual tests of inspiratory, diaphragm and expiratory muscle strength tends to overdiagnose weakness. Combinations of tests increase diagnostic precision and, in the population studied, they reduced the diagnosis of inspiratory, specific diaphragm and expiratory muscle weakness by 19-56%. Measuring both Pimax and Sniff Pnasal resulted in a relative reduction of 19.2% of patients falsely diagnosed with inspiratory muscle weakness. The addition of Twitch Pdi to Sniff Pdi increased diagnostic precision by a smaller amount (18.9%). Having multiple tests of respiratory muscle function available both increases diagnostic precision and makes assessment possible in a range of clinical circumstances.

Background: Some patients with irreversible chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) experience subjective benefit from long acting bronchodilators without change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)). Dynamic hyperinflation is an important determinant of exercise induced dyspnoea in COPD. We hypothesised that long acting bronchodilators improve symptoms by reducing dynamic hyperinflation and work of breathing, as measured by respiratory muscle pressure-time products., Methods: Sixteen patients with "irreversible" COPD (<10% improvement in FEV(1) following a bronchodilator challenge; mean FEV(1) 31.1% predicted) were recruited into a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, crossover study of salmeterol (50 micro g twice a day). Treatment periods were of 2 weeks duration with a 2 week washout period. Primary outcome measures were end exercise isotime transdiaphragmatic pressure-time product and dynamic hyperinflation as measured by inspiratory capacity., Results: Salmeterol significantly reduced the transdiaphragmatic pressure-time product (294.5 v 348.6 cm H(2)O/s/min; p = 0.03), dynamic hyperinflation (0.22 v 0.33 litres; p = 0.002), and Borg scores during endurance treadmill walk (3.78 v 4.62; p = 0.02). There was no significant change in exercise endurance time. Improvements in isotime Borg score were significantly correlated to changes in tidal volume/oesophageal pressure swings, end expiratory lung volume, and inspiratory capacity, but not pressure-time products., Conclusions: Despite apparent "non-reversibility" in spirometric parameters, long acting bronchodilators can cause both symptomatic and physiological improvement during exercise in severe COPD.

Background: Although quadriceps weakness is well recognised in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the aetiology remains unknown. In disabled patients the quadriceps is a particularly underused muscle and may not reflect skeletal muscle function as a whole. Loss of muscle function is likely to be equally distributed if the underlying pathology is a systemic abnormality. Conversely, if deconditioning and disuse are the principal aetiological factors, weakness would be most marked in the lower limb muscles., Methods: The non-volitional technique of supramaximal magnetic stimulation was used to assess twitch tensions of the adductor pollicis, quadriceps, and diaphragm muscles (TwAP, TwQ, and TwPdi) in 22 stable non-weight losing COPD patients and 18 elderly controls., Results: Mean (SD) TwQ tension was reduced in the COPD patients (7.1 (2.2) kg v 10.0 (2.7) kg; 95% confidence intervals (CI) -4.4 to -1.4; p<0.001). Neither TwAP nor TwPdi (when corrected for lung volume) differed significantly between patients and controls (mean (SD) TwAP 6.52 (1.90) N for COPD patients and 6.80 (1.99) N for controls (95% CI -1.5 to 0.97, p=0.65; TwPdi 23.0 (5.6) cm H(2)O for COPD patients and 23.5 (5.2) cm H(2)O for controls (95% CI -4.5 to 3.5, p=0.81)., Conclusions: The strength of the adductor pollicis muscle (and the diaphragm) is normal in patients with stable COPD whereas quadriceps strength is substantially reduced. Disuse may be the principal factor in the development of skeletal muscle weakness in COPD, but a systemic process preferentially affecting the proximal muscles cannot be excluded.

Objective: To determine if differences in respiratory muscle strength could explain any posture related effects on oxygenation in convalescent neonates., Methods: Infants were examined in three postures: supine, supine with head up tilt of 45 degrees, and prone. A subsequent study was performed to determine the influence of head position in the supine posture. In each posture/head position, oxygen saturation (SaO2) was determined and respiratory muscle strength assessed by measurement of the maximum inspiratory pressure (PIMAX)., Patients: Twenty infants, median gestational age 34.5 weeks (range 25-43), and 10 infants, median gestational age 33 weeks (range 30-36), were entered into the first and second study respectively., Results: Oxygenation was higher in the prone and supine with 45 degrees head up tilt postures than in the supine posture (p<0.001), whereas PIMAX was higher in the supine and supine with head up tilt of 45 degrees postures than in the prone posture (p<0.001). Head position did not influence the effect of posture on PIMAX or oxygenation., Conclusion: Superior oxygenation in the prone posture in convalescent infants was not explained by greater respiratory muscle strength, as this was superior in the supine posture.

Expiratory muscle strength is a determinant of cough function. Mouth pressures during a maximal static expiratory effort (PE,max) are dependent on patient motivation and technique and low values are therefore difficult to interpret. This study hypothesized that a short, sharp and maximal expiration through a narrow aperture, a "whistle", might provide a complementary test of expiratory muscle strength. To obtain a maximal whistle, subjects (27 healthy volunteers and 10 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) were asked to perform a short, sharp blow as hard as possible, from total lung capacity, through a reversed paediatric inhaler whistle, connected to a flange-type mouthpiece. In both healthy subjects and patients, whistle mouth pressure (Pmo,W) was closely related to the pressure measured in the oesophagus and stomach during the same manoeuvre. In healthy subjects, Pmo,W and PE,max correlated with wide limits of agreement, although Pmo,W values were significantly higher than PE,max (131+/-31 cmH2O versus 101+/-27 cmH2O, p<0.0001). In patients, it was also found that Pmo,w and PE,max values were strongly related (r=0.937, p<0.0001). In healthy subjects, the intraclass correlation coefficient and the variation coefficient for Pmo,W repeated measurements were respectively 0.88 and 7.0%. However Pmo,W and PE,max were always smaller than the gastric pressure generated by a maximal cough. It is concluded that mouth whistle pressure, a noninvasive, reproducible and simple test, provides a reliable measure of expiratory muscle strength in healthy subjects that is acceptable to patients and can be used in a complementary fashion to maximal static expiratory effort.

Maximal static inspiratory pressure (P(IMAX)) generated at the mouth is one of the tests of inspiratory muscle strength in children. In adults, inspiratory muscle strength has also been assessed using sniff nasal inspiratory pressure (SNIP). This test is easier to perform than P(IMAX) and might therefore be applicable to children. To test this hypothesis, we measured P(IMAX) and SNIP in 116 children aged 4 to 11 years (54 girls, 62 boys). P(IMAX) was measured using a tube mouthpiece and SNIP using a tightly fitting plug in one nostril, while a sniff was performed through the other nostril. Both tests were performed from functional residual capacity (FRC). Pressure was measured with a differential pressure transducer and displayed in real time on a computer screen. Weight, standing height, sitting height, gender, and age were recorded. There was a significant difference (P < 0.01) in group mean (SD) data between SNIP (81.3 (27.4) cmH(2)O) and P(IMAX) (67.9 (28.1) cmH(2)O). Bland/Altman analysis demonstrated a mean difference of -13.5 cmH(2)O (SD 21.4) between the techniques. Regression analysis indicated highly significant relations (P < 0.01) between SNIP and P(IMAX), and between weight, standing and sitting height, and age for SNIP, and between weight, standing height, and age for P(IMAX). SNIP and P(IMAX) were greater in boys than girls (83.2 vs. 79.2 cmH(2)O SNIP; 72.9 vs. 62.0 cmH(2)O P(IMAX)), but this difference was only significant for P(IMAX) (P < 0.05). SNIP was significantly greater than P(IMAX) (P < 0.01) in both boys and girls. These data suggest that SNIP provides a simple, noninvasive additional test to P(IMAX) for assessing inspiratory muscle strength in children., (Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Respiratory muscle strength can be assessed by measurement of maximal inspiratory (PIMAX) and maximal expiratory pressure (P(EMAX)) during crying. There are, however, relatively few data on P(IMAX) and P(EMAX) in infancy, particularly from those born preterm. Our aim was to investigate which factors influenced P(IMAX) and P(EMAX) in preterm and term infants. Forty infants, median gestational age 37 weeks (range 26-43) and birthweight 2.579 kg (range 0.956-5.180) were studied at a postconceptional age (PCA) of 38 weeks (range 32-44). None had respiratory problems. A facemask was placed firmly over the infant's mouth and nose and the infant studied during spontaneous crying. A pneumotachograph fitted snugly into the facemask and from a sideport airway pressure changes were measured. During crying, the distal end of the pneumotachograph was occluded for five breaths and at least three separate occlusions were made. The highest P(EMAX) value sustained for at least 1 s and the highest peak inspiratory pressure P(IMAX) were recorded. The mean P(IMAX) and P(EMAX) were higher in the term compared to the preterm infants (70 cmH2O +/-S.D. 19 versus 58 cmH2O +/-S.D. 17 P(IMAX) and 53 cmH2O +/-S.D. 13 versus 44 cmH2O +/-S.D. 19 P(EMAX), P< 0.05). Both P(IMAX) and P(EMAX) related significantly with postconceptional age, gestational age and weight, but not postnatal age. Stepwise regression analysis demonstrated P(IMAX) related independently with PCA and P(EMAX) with weight. These results suggest respiratory muscle strength is influenced by maturation at birth.