Search

Background: Predicting fluid responsiveness may help to avoid unnecessary fluid administration during acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the following methods to predict fluid responsiveness in ARDS patients under protective ventilation in the prone position: cardiac index variation during a Trendelenburg maneuver, cardiac index variation during an end-expiratory occlusion test, and both pulse pressure variation and change in pulse pressure variation from baseline during a tidal volume challenge by increasing tidal volume (VT) to 8 ml.kg -1 ., Methods: This study is a prospective single-center study, performed in a medical intensive care unit, on ARDS patients with acute circulatory failure in the prone position. Patients were studied at baseline, during a 1-min shift to the Trendelenburg position, during a 15-s end-expiratory occlusion, during a 1-min increase in VT to 8 ml.kg -1 , and after fluid administration. Fluid responsiveness was deemed present if cardiac index assessed by transpulmonary thermodilution increased by at least 15% after fluid administration., Results: There were 33 patients included, among whom 14 (42%) exhibited cardiac arrhythmia at baseline and 15 (45%) were deemed fluid-responsive. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the pulse contour-derived cardiac index change during the Trendelenburg maneuver and the end-expiratory occlusion test were 0.90 (95% CI, 0.80-1.00) and 0.65 (95% CI, 0.46-0.84), respectively. An increase in cardiac index ≥ 8% during the Trendelenburg maneuver enabled diagnosis of fluid responsiveness with sensitivity of 87% (95% CI, 67-100), and specificity of 89% (95% CI, 72-100). The area under the ROC curve of pulse pressure variation and change in pulse pressure variation during the tidal volume challenge were 0.52 (95% CI, 0.24-0.80) and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.31-0.88), respectively., Conclusions: Change in cardiac index during a Trendelenburg maneuver is a reliable test to predict fluid responsiveness in ARDS patients in the prone position, while neither change in cardiac index during end-expiratory occlusion, nor pulse pressure variation during a VT challenge reached acceptable predictive performance to predict fluid responsiveness in this setting., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01965574 . Registered on 16 October 2013. The trial was registered 6 days after inclusion of the first patient.

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to assess the rate of diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) on open lung biopsy (OLB) performed in the ICU for nonresolving ARDS., Methods: A single-center retrospective study of patients meeting the Berlin definition criteria for ARDS who had undergone OLB for nonresolving ARDS. Patients were classified into mild, moderate and severe ARDS categories and according to the presence or absence of DAD on the OLB. The ARDS categories were assessed at baseline and at the time of the OLB. The OLBs were reviewed by two pathologists blinded to the ARDS classification. The primary endpoint was the rate of DAD according to the ARDS stage in the patients with nonresolving ARDS who had OLB. The secondary endpoint was the ability of DAD to predict ARDS among all the patients who had OLB. The same clinico-histopathological confrontation was cross validated in another ICU., Results: From January 1998 to August 2013, 113 patients underwent OLB for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, 83 of whom met the inclusion criteria for ARDS. At the time the OLB was performed, 11 of these patients had mild, 56 moderate, and 16 severe ARDS, respectively. The median (1st-3rd quartiles) time to OLB was 13 (10-18) and 9 (6-14) days from the onset of respiratory symptoms and from ARDS onset, respectively, with no statistical difference between the three ARDS groups. DAD was found in 48 (58 %) patients with ARDS, 4 (36 %) in the mild, 33 (59 %) in the moderate, and 11 (69 %) in the severe stage (P = 0.23). For the 113 patients who underwent OLB, the sensitivity and specificity of DAD to the Berlin definition was 0.58 (0.46-0.69) and 0.73 (0.54-0.88), respectively. Similar results were found in the other ICU., Conclusions: DAD is present in the majority of patients with nonresolving ARDs and its frequency is no different across the three ARDS stages. On this basis, the systematic use of steroids in nonresolving ARDS is not recommended.

Background: We wanted to assess whether there was a significant relationship between recruited lung volume (V(rec)) and change in density on digital processed chest x-ray measured at 2 different levels of inspiratory plateau pressure corresponding to 2 PEEP levels in patients with acute lung injury or ARDS., Methods: In 14 subjects, PEEP 5 cm H2O and 15 cm H2O were prospectively applied in a random order for 10 min. At the end of each period, chest x-ray was taken using a digital portable device, and a pressure-volume curve of the respiratory system was performed. We also assessed P(aO2), and the static and the dynamic (C(dyn,rs)) compliance of the respiratory system. Change in end-expiratory lung volume between tidal breath and relaxation volume of the respiratory system was determined. Radiological attenuation was measured on chest x-rays in 4 regions of interest in the right lung, and in 3 regions of interest in the left lung, drawn in posterior intercostal spaces from top to bottom, by using dedicated software. The ratio of lung density in each region between PEEP 15 and PEEP 5 (rP15/P5) and their arithmetic mean (μP15/P5) were computed. V(rec) was determined from the pressure-volume curves., Results: The median value of rP15/P5 in the 98 lung levels was 0.91 (0.80-1.01), which was significantly different from 1 (P < .001). The values of rP15/P5 were not significantly different between the lung levels. The median values of V(rec) and μP15/P5 were 288 (173-402) mL and 0.90 (0.80-0.97), respectively. There was a significant negative correlation between V(rec) and μP15/P5 (R = -0.77, P = .01). The reduction in μP15/P5 tended to correlate with the increase in C(dyn,rs) (R = -0.49, P = .077) or in P(aO2) (R = -0.53, P = .05) between PEEP 15 cm H2O and PEEP 5 cm H2O., Conclusions: Digital chest x-ray done at the bedside in acute lung injury/ARDS subjects was able to detect a reduction in density between PEEP 5 cm H2O and PEEP 15 cm H2O, which correlated with V(rec).

Objective: To investigate the viscoelastic properties of lungs and thoracic wall in piglets., Study Design: Prospective experimental study., Animals: Six piglets weighting 30 kg., Methods: Animals were tracheotomized, anesthetized and mechanically ventilated under controlled conditions. After control measurements of the mechanical properties of the lung of the pigs had been taken, acute lung injury (ALI) was induced by saline lavage. Lung and thoracic wall tissue resistance (DeltaR), which reflects viscoelastic properties and/or time constant inequalities, were determined by using a rapid airway occlusion technique during constant flow inflation (V), at constant tidal volume. was varied from 0.1-0.2 to 1.2 L second(-1) on a single breath. Multiple data sets of DeltaR of lung (DeltaR(L)) and thoracic wall (DeltaR(w)) to inspiratory time (T(I) = V(T)/V) were fitted to a model whose prediction equation was DeltaR = R(2)[1 -exp(-T(I)/tau(2))], where R(2) and tau(2) are the 'viscoelastic' resistance and time constant, respectively. Subscripts (L) and (W) are used to represent lung and thoracic wall, respectively (R(2L), R(2W), tau(2L), tau(2W)). Two more sets of physiological measurements were then taken--the first under zero end-expiratory pressure (ZEEP) and the second under a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 10 cmH(2)O., Results: Data of DeltaR adequately fitted to the prediction equation in all instances. In control, R(2,L) was 15.3 (10.7-22.6) cmH(2)O L(-1) second(-1) (median, interquartile range), tau(2,L) 3.3 (1.9-5.5) seconds, R(2,w) 6.5 (2.2-10.3) cmH(2)O L(-1) second(-1) and tau(2,w) 2.9 (1.1-4.3) seconds. In ALI, R(2,L) significantly increased to 129.6 (105.9-171.3) cmH(2)O L(-1) second(-1) on ZEEP but not significantly decreased to 48.9 (17.8-109.6) cmH(2)O L(-1) second(-1) with PEEP. The corresponding values of tau(2,L) were 7.1 (5.1-11.6) and 4.4 (3.1-5.5) seconds. The values pertaining to thoracic wall did not change significantly among conditions., Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: Viscoelastic properties of the lung and thoracic wall in piglets can be described by a viscoelastic model. Values of parameters of this model were markedly increased in ALI and decreased with PEEP.