Search

Objective: To evaluate the feasibility and safety of administering surfactant into the nasopharynx during delivery, thus permitting the baby to aspirate the solution into the fluid-filled airway as an air-fluid interface is established. This process avoids the endotracheal intubation (ETI) and positive pressure ventilation (PPV) usually associated with prophylaxis, thus avoiding the pulmonary barotrauma associated with the conventional method of surfactant administration., Study Design: In all, 23 neonates weighing 560 to 1804 g and born at 27 to 30 weeks had their nasopharyngeal airways suctioned and then 3.0-4.5 ml Infasurf instilled into the nasopharynx before delivery of the shoulders. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) of 10 cmH(2)O was administered by mask as the babies initiated breathing. Nasal CPAP at 6 cmH(2)O was then continued for a minimum of 48 hours., Results: In all, 13 of 15 babies delivered vaginally were weaned quickly to room air and required no further surfactant or endotracheal intubation for RDS. Five of eight babies delivered by C-section required subsequent endotracheal intubation soon after birth and two received subsequent endotracheal tube surfactant., Conclusion: Nasopharyngeal surfactant instillation at birth appears to be relatively safe and simple to accomplish, especially for vaginal births. A large randomized clinical trial will be required to determine the efficacy of this technique when compared to prophylaxis by endotracheal intubation and to nCPAP alone.

Unlabelled: Surfactant therapy has become an effective standard therapy for infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS). The first dose may be given either as prophylaxis immediately after delivery, or as rescue after an infant has developed RDS. Second and subsequent doses are currently recommended by the manufacturers to be administered at minimal levels of respiratory support., Purpose: This study compared the relative efficacy of administering second and subsequent doses of Infasurf surfactant at a low threshold (FIO(2) >30%, still requiring endotracheal intubation) versus a high threshold (FIO(2) >40%, mean airway pressure >7 cm H(2)O) of respiratory support., Methods: A total of 2484 neonates received a first dose of surfactant; 1267 reached conventional retreatment criteria and were randomized to be retreated according to low- or high-threshold criteria. They were then retreated at a minimum of 6-hour intervals each time they reached their assigned threshold until receiving a maximum of 4 total doses. Subjects were stratified by whether they received their first dose by prophylaxis or rescue and by whether their lung disease was considered complicated (evidence of perinatal compromise or sepsis) or uncomplicated., Results: Among the patients randomized, 33% of prophylaxis and 23% of rescue subjects met criteria for the complicated stratum. Although infants allocated to the high-threshold strategy were receiving slightly more oxygen at 72 hours, there was no difference in the number receiving mechanical ventilation at 72 hours or in the secondary respiratory outcomes (requirement for supplemental oxygen or mechanical ventilation at 28 days, supplemental oxygen at 36 weeks' postconceptional age, inspired oxygen concentration >60% at any time). However, there was a significantly higher mortality for infants with complicated RDS who had received retreatment according to the high-threshold strategy., Conclusions: We conclude that equal efficacy can be realized by delaying surfactant retreatment of infants with uncomplicated RDS until they have reached a higher level of respiratory support than is the current standard. We speculate that this would result in a substantial cost-saving from less utilization of drug. Conversely, we believe that infants with complicated RDS should continue to be treated by the low-threshold retreatment strategy, which is currently recommended by the manufacturers of the commercially available surfactants.

Objective: To compare the relative safety and efficacy of Infasurf (calf lung surfactant extract; ONY, Inc, Amherst, NY, IND #27169) versus Survanta (Beractant, Ross Laboratories, Columbus, OH) in reducing the acute severity of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) when given at birth and to infants with established RDS., Design: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial., Setting: Thirteen neonatal intensive care units participated in the treatment arm: seven of these concurrently participated in the prevention arm., Patients: The treatment arm enrolled infants of

Objective: Although numerous trials have demonstrated the efficacy of exogenous surfactant for prophylaxis or treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), optimum timing of administration remains controversial. One previous study showed that administration of calf lung surfactant extract immediately following birth, to neonates born before 30 weeks postconceptional age, was preferable to delaying administration until after development of RDS. The current study was designed to test a similar hypothesis for babies born between 29 and 32 weeks gestational age., Design: One thousand three hundred ninety-eight neonates with obstetric estimates of 29 through 32 weeks' gestation were randomized to receive CLSE at birth or to wait until development of mild RDS. After exclusions for malformations and other factors, data from 1248 were analyzed., Results: Prophylaxis was associated with less development of moderate RDS (7% vs 12%), less need for retreatment (5% vs 9%), less need for mechanical ventilation or supplemental oxygen during the first 4 days, and fewer deaths or less requirement for supplemental oxygen at 28 days (5% vs 9%). Although 1-minute Apgar scores were significantly lower in the prophylaxis group, the difference disappeared by the 5-minute score and there was no difference in the incidence of asphyxia-related complications. Sixty percent of the neonates assigned to early treatment received endotracheal intubation and 43% received calf lung surfactant extract at a median age of 1.5 hours. When data were analyzed by gestational age and birth weight subgroups, most of the differences could be attributable to babies born at 30 weeks or less or weighing less than 1500 g, probably because of the higher incidence of surfactant deficiency in this more immature subgroup.

An 1180-g infant with esophageal atresia and tracheoesophageal fistula developed life-threatening respiratory distress syndrome. Conventional mechanical ventilation resulted in gastric perforation and pneumoperitoneum. High-frequency ventilation stabilized the infant, permitting distal occlusion of the esophagus with a Silastic band. Fistula ligation was subsequently performed under more optimal physiologic conditions.

Preterm triplets were treated with calf lung surfactant extract (CLSE). Two were treated at birth without development of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS); one was treated after development of RDS, with rapid improvement. These cases demonstrated the efficacy of exogenous surfactant and the potential benefit of prophylaxis (early treatment) over late treatment. Although various exogenous surfactants have been used successfully to treat or prevent RDS in preterm infants, the optimal time of surfactant treatment has not been established. Surfactant therapy at birth results in a reduction in the incidence and severity of RDS, but it could lead to unnecessary treatment in a significant portion of patients. On the other hand, delaying treatment is likely to lessen the benefits of exogenous surfactant by various factors, including barotrauma and oxygen toxicity. The triplets in this report were treated with Infasurf CLSE. Two were treated at birth without development of RDS, but one was treated after development of RDS, with rapid improvement of respiratory status.