Search

Purpose: Our objective was to revise the definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) using a conceptual model incorporating reliability and validity, and a novel iterative approach with formal evaluation of the definition. Methods: The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine identified three chairs with broad expertise in ARDS who selected the participants and created the agenda. After 2 days of consensus discussions a draft definition was developed, which then underwent empiric evaluation followed by consensus revision. Results: The Berlin Definition of ARDS maintains a link to prior definitions with diagnostic criteria of timing, chest imaging, origin of edema, and hypoxemia. Patients may have ARDS if the onset is within 1 week of a known clinical insult or new/worsening respiratory symptoms. For the bilateral opacities on chest radiograph criterion, a reference set of chest radiographs has been developed to enhance inter-observer reliability. The pulmonary artery wedge pressure criterion for hydrostatic edema was removed, and illustrative vignettes were created to guide judgments about the primary cause of respiratory failure. If no risk factor for ARDS is apparent, however, objective evaluation (e.g., echocardiography) is required to help rule out hydrostatic edema. A minimum level of positive end-expiratory pressure and mutually exclusive PaO/FiO thresholds were chosen for the different levels of ARDS severity (mild, moderate, severe) to better categorize patients with different outcomes and potential responses to therapy. Conclusions: This panel addressed some of the limitations of the prior ARDS definition by incorporating current data, physiologic concepts, and clinical trials results to develop the Berlin definition, which should facilitate case recognition and better match treatment options to severity in both research trials and clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Use of lung-protective mechanical ventilation (MV) by applying lower tidal volumes is recommended in patients suffering from acute lung injury (ALI) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Recent data suggest that lung-protective MV may benefit non-ALI/ARDS patients as well. This study analyzed tidal volume settings in three ICUs in The Netherlands to determine the effect of feedback and education concerning use of lung-protective MV.Design and Setting: Observational study in one academic and two nonacademic "closed format" ICUs.Patients: Intubated mechanically ventilated subjects.Interventions: Feedback and education concerning lung-protective MV with special attention to the importance of closely adjusting tidal volumes to predicted body weight (PBW).Results: Tidal volumes declined significantly within 6 months after intervention (from 9.8+/-2.0 at baseline to 8.1+/-1.7 ml/kg PBW) as the percentage of undesirable ventilation data points, defined as tidal volumes greater than 8 ml/kg PBW (84% vs. 48%). There were no differences between patients meeting the international definition criteria for ALI/ARDS and those not. Only four patients received tidal volumes less than 6 ml/kg PBW. Lower tidal volumes were still used after 12 months. Tidal volumes in patients on mandatory MV and patients breathing on spontaneous modes were similar.Conclusions: Feedback and education improve physician compliance in use of lung-protective MV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Measurements from the pulmonary pressure-volume (PV) curve have been proposed to adjust ventilator settings. We investigated the effects of repeated construction of an inflation PV curve implemented in a standard ventilator on recruitment or derecruitment in acutely injured lungs.Design and Setting: Prospective experimental animal study in eight anesthetized and mechanically ventilated pigs.Interventions: Acute lung injury was induced by lung lavage and animals were ventilated in volume controlled mode with PEEP 10 cmH(2)O. The PV curve was constructed five times repeatedly by constant pressure rise, after which ventilation with the preset PEEP was resumed immediately. Studies of hemodynamics, lung mechanics, blood gases and computed tomography were carried out before and after maneuvers.Measurements and Results: Derecruitment was assessed as an increase in nonaerated lung volume (V(NON)), and V(PEEP) was the end-expiratory volume difference between PEEP and ZEEP. There was a significant decrease in PaO(2) from 90.4+/-33.3 to 70.9+/-36.3 mmHg and a rise in venous admixture from 47.8+/-12.7 to 59.1+/-16.6%. V(PEEP) was reduced from 244 to 202 ml. A corresponding decrease in normally aerated lung volume was observed, while regression analysis revealed increase in V(NON) depending on the amount of preexisting atelectasis.Conclusions: Repeated generation of the PV curve with a readily available tool resulted in worsened oxygenation. Derecruitment of the lungs occurred with loss of PEEP at the start of the maneuver, which could not be recovered by a maximum inflation pressure of 40 cmH(2)O. Repeated use of the investigated tool should be cautioned, and users should consider measures to preserve aerated lung volumes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]