Search

Background: We aimed to examine whether using a high fraction of inspired oxygen (FIO 2 ) in the context of an individualised intra- and postoperative open-lung ventilation approach could decrease surgical site infection (SSI) in patients scheduled for abdominal surgery., Methods: We performed a multicentre, randomised controlled clinical trial in a network of 21 university hospitals from June 6, 2017 to July 19, 2018. Patients undergoing abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to receive a high (0.80) or conventional (0.3) FIO 2 during the intraoperative period and during the first 3 postoperative hours. All patients were mechanically ventilated with an open-lung strategy, which included recruitment manoeuvres and individualised positive end-expiratory pressure for the best respiratory-system compliance, and individualised continuous postoperative airway pressure for adequate peripheral oxyhaemoglobin saturation. The primary outcome was the prevalence of SSI within the first 7 postoperative days. The secondary outcomes were composites of systemic complications, length of intensive care and hospital stay, and 6-month mortality., Results: We enrolled 740 subjects: 371 in the high FIO 2 group and 369 in the low FIO 2 group. Data from 717 subjects were available for final analysis. The rate of SSI during the first postoperative week did not differ between high (8.9%) and low (9.4%) FIO 2 groups (relative risk [RR]: 0.94; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.59-1.50; P=0.90]). Secondary outcomes, such as atelectasis (7.7% vs 9.8%; RR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.48-1.25; P=0.38) and myocardial ischaemia (0.6% [n=2] vs 0% [n=0]; P=0.47) did not differ between groups., Conclusions: An oxygenation strategy using high FIO 2 compared with conventional FIO 2 did not reduce postoperative SSIs in abdominal surgery. No differences in secondary outcomes or adverse events were found., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT02776046., (Copyright © 2019 British Journal of Anaesthesia. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The effects of individualised perioperative lung-protective ventilation (based on the open-lung approach [OLA]) on postoperative complications is unknown. We aimed to investigate the effects of intraoperative and postoperative ventilatory management in patients scheduled for abdominal surgery, compared with standard protective ventilation., Methods: We did this prospective, multicentre, randomised controlled trial in 21 teaching hospitals in Spain. We enrolled patients who were aged 18 years or older, were scheduled to have abdominal surgery with an expected time of longer than 2 h, had intermediate-to-high-risk of developing postoperative pulmonary complications, and who had a body-mass index less than 35 kg/m 2 . Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) online to receive one of four lung-protective ventilation strategies using low tidal volume plus positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP): open-lung approach (OLA)-iCPAP (individualised intraoperative ventilation [individualised PEEP after a lung recruitment manoeuvre] plus individualised postoperative continuous positive airway pressure [CPAP]), OLA-CPAP (intraoperative individualised ventilation plus postoperative CPAP), STD-CPAP (standard intraoperative ventilation plus postoperative CPAP), or STD-O 2 (standard intraoperative ventilation plus standard postoperative oxygen therapy). Patients were masked to treatment allocation. Investigators were not masked in the operating and postoperative rooms; after 24 h, data were given to a second investigator who was masked to allocations. The primary outcome was a composite of pulmonary and systemic complications during the first 7 postoperative days. We did the primary analysis using the modified intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02158923., Findings: Between Jan 2, 2015, and May 18, 2016, we enrolled 1012 eligible patients. Data were available for 967 patients, whom we included in the final analysis. Risk of pulmonary and systemic complications did not differ for patients in OLA-iCPAP (110 [46%] of 241, relative risk 0·89 [95% CI 0·74-1·07; p=0·25]), OLA-CPAP (111 [47%] of 238, 0·91 [0·76-1·09; p=0·35]), or STD-CPAP groups (118 [48%] of 244, 0·95 [0·80-1·14; p=0·65]) when compared with patients in the STD-O 2 group (125 [51%] of 244). Intraoperatively, PEEP was increased in 69 (14%) of patients in the standard perioperative ventilation groups because of hypoxaemia, and no patients from either of the OLA groups required rescue manoeuvres., Interpretation: In patients who have major abdominal surgery, the different perioperative open lung approaches tested in this study did not reduce the risk of postoperative complications when compared with standard lung-protective mechanical ventilation., Funding: Instituto de Salud Carlos III of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, and Grants Programme of the European Society of Anaesthesiology., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Surgical site infection (SSI) is a serious postoperative complication that increases morbidity and healthcare costs. SSIs tend to increase as the partial pressure of tissue oxygen decreases: previous trials have focused on trying to reduce them by comparing high versus conventional inspiratory oxygen fractions (FIO 2 ) in the perioperative period but did not use a protocolised ventilatory strategy. The open-lung ventilatory approach restores functional lung volume and improves gas exchange, and therefore it may increase the partial pressure of tissue oxygen for a given FIO 2 . The trial presented here aims to compare the efficacy of high versus conventional FIO 2 in reducing the overall incidence of SSIs in patients by implementing a protocolised and individualised global approach to perioperative open-lung ventilation., Methods and Analysis: This is a comparative, prospective, multicentre, randomised and controlled two-arm trial that will include 756 patients scheduled for abdominal surgery. The patients will be randomised into two groups: (1) a high FIO 2 group (80% oxygen; FIO 2 of 0.80) and (2) a conventional FIO 2 group (30% oxygen; FIO 2 of 0.30). Each group will be assessed intra- and postoperatively. The primary outcome is the appearance of postoperative SSI complications. Secondary outcomes are the appearance of systemic and pulmonary complications., Ethics and Dissemination: The iPROVE-O2 trial has been approved by the Ethics Review Board at the reference centre (the Hospital Clínico Universitario in Valencia). Informed consent will be obtained from all patients before their participation. If the approach using high FIO 2 during individualised open-lung ventilation decreases SSIs, use of this method will become standard practice for patients scheduled for future abdominal surgery. Publication of the results is anticipated in early 2019., Trial Registration Number: NCT02776046; Pre-results., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The study is an investigator-initiated trial which will be promoted by the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care at the Hospital Clínico Universitario in Valencia, Spain., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

Background: Pulmonary edema (PE) after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) may compromise the postoperative course and prolong the duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and intensive care unit length of stay. Hemodynamic monitoring with transpulmonary thermodilution permits quantification of extravascular lung water index (ELWI) and calculation of the pulmonary vascular permeability index (PVPI), which is the ratio between the ELWI and the pulmonary blood volume. This ratio can discriminate between PE hydrostatic and nonhydrostatic PE. We investigated the relationship between ELWI and PVPI values, measured at the end of surgery, and prolonged MV (PMV) in patients after OLT., Methods: We retrospectively studied 93 consecutive patients who underwent OLT. We recorded preoperative data including spirometry, echocardiography, severity liver disease with the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, and the Child-Pugh classification scores. Intraoperatively, we performed hemodynamic measurements with transpulmonary thermodilution and pulmonary arterial catheters after the induction of anesthesia, 10 minutes before reperfusion, and at the end of surgery. Moreover, we recorded the length of surgery, the amount of IV volume infused, the results of blood coagulation analyses, and blood transfusion. Postoperatively, we recorded the duration of MV and intensive care unit length of stay, mortality, and graft function. Patients were then classified as requiring PMV (>48 hours after surgery) or not. Statistical analyses, preoperative and intraoperative variables between patients with and without PMV, were compared using Mann-Whitney U tests. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate the ability of preoperative and intraoperative variables to predict PMV., Results: Twelve patients required PMV after surgery. Patients who required PMV exhibited increased ELWI (11.6 ± 3 mL/kg vs 9.3 ± 2 mL/kg, P = 0.0099) and PVPI values (2.94 ± 1 vs 1.8 ± 0.6, P = 0.000015) at the end of surgery. The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve were 0.890 ± 0.04 for PVPI with a 99% confidence interval of 0.782 to 0.958 and 0.730 ± 0.08 for ELWI with a 99% confidence interval of 0.594 to 0.839. Using a cutoff of 2.3 for PVPI allowed a sensitivity = 91.7%, a specificity = 83.8, a positive predictive value = 45.8%, and a negative predictive value = 98.5% for predicting PMV. A cutoff of 12 for ELWI allowed a sensitivity of 50%, specificity of 85%, positive predictive value of 33.3%, and negative predictive value of 91.9% for PMV., Conclusions: PVPI and ELWI values obtained at the end of OLT are useful for predicting the need for postoperative PMV.

Background: Postoperative pulmonary and non-pulmonary complications are common problems that increase morbidity and mortality in surgical patients, even though the incidence has decreased with the increased use of protective lung ventilation strategies. Previous trials have focused on standard strategies in the intraoperative or postoperative period, but without personalizing these strategies to suit the needs of each individual patient and without considering both these periods as a global perioperative lung-protective approach. The trial presented here aims at comparing postoperative complications when using an individualized ventilatory management strategy in the intraoperative and immediate postoperative periods with those when using a standard protective ventilation strategy in patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery., Methods: This is a comparative, prospective, multicenter, randomized, and controlled, four-arm trial that will include 1012 patients with an intermediate or high risk for postoperative pulmonary complications. The patients will be divided into four groups: (1) individualized perioperative group: intra- and postoperative individualized strategy; (2) intraoperative individualized strategy + postoperative continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP); (3) intraoperative standard ventilation + postoperative CPAP; (4) intra- and postoperative standard strategy (conventional strategy). The primary outcome is a composite analysis of postoperative complications., Discussion: The Individualized Perioperative Open-lung Ventilatory Strategy (iPROVE) is the first multicenter, randomized, and controlled trial to investigate whether an individualized perioperative approach prevents postoperative pulmonary complications., Trial Registration: Registered on 5 June 2014 with identification no. NCT02158923 .

Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the ventilatory mode used during one-lung ventilation (OLV) and intraoperative and early postoperative arterial oxygenation in patients undergoing thoracic surgery., Methods: A prospective, randomized clinical trial., Setting: A tertiary care university hospital single institution., Participants: One hundred ten patients scheduled for thoracic surgery with at least 1 hour of OLV., Interventions: Patients were prospectively randomized into 2 groups depending on the ventilatory mode used during OLV: volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) or pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV). In VCV, the authors used a tidal volume (Vt) of 8 mL/kg and in the PCV group an inspiratory pressure to provide a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg., Measurements and Main Results: Airway pressures and arterial blood gases were obtained at 20, 30, and 40 minutes after OLV. The authors recorded the ratio of arterial oxygen tension to inspired oxygen fraction (PaO(2)/F(I)O(2)) at 4 hours (RU1) and 24 hours (RU2) after surgery. During OLV, there were no differences in arterial oxygenation, airway plateau pressure, and mean pressure between groups, although peak pressure was higher in the VCV group (p < 0.01). The PaO(2)/F(I)O(2) ratio at RU1 was 312.6 +/- 106 in the VCV group and 322.1 +/- 104. In the PCV group at RU2, it was 402.4 +/- 105 and 389.6 +/- 114, respectively, and there were no significant differences between the groups., Conclusions: In patients undergoing thoracic surgery, the use of PCV compared with VCV during OLV with the same Vt of 8 mL/kg does not affect arterial oxygenation during OLV or early postoperative oxygenation.

Objective: The objective of the present study was to investigate respiratory and hemodynamic changes by measuring continuous cardiac output, cardiac filling, and stroke volume variation after lung recruitment in thoracic surgery., Design: A prospective, observational study., Setting: A tertiary care university hospital single institution., Participants: Forty patients undergoing thoracotomy for lung resection with at least 1 hour of one-lung ventilation (OLV)., Interventions: During OLV, an alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM) was performed., Measurements and Main Results: Based on Edwards Vigileo/FloTrac system (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA), the arterial pressure-based cardiac output, cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance, stroke volume variation, and central venous oxygen saturation were recorded immediately before the maneuver and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 10 minutes after the maneuver. Stroke volume variation was the parameter most affected during and after the maneuver; it increased to 50% and 40% in the first and second minute, respectively (p < 0.01). The cardiac index was also affected and decreased 9.4% (p < 0.05) in the first minute after the maneuver. ScvO2 decreased significantly during the first 2 minutes (7% and 6.5%, respectively). However, after 3 minutes, all values recorded were similar to prerecruitment values. The PaO2 and PcvO2 from samples taken 10 minutes after the maneuver improved considerably with respect to the values before alveolar recruitment., Conclusions: The authors concluded that during open-chest surgery with OLV, an ARM effectively improved oxygenation without inducing important circulatory changes.

Objective: There is increasing interest in the use of the thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in association with general anesthesia for lung-resection surgery. The aim of the study was to evaluate the hemodynamic effects of a 5-mg/kg lidocaine bolus injected in the thoracic paravertebral space during one-lung ventilation (OLV) in noncardiac patients undergoing thoracic surgery., Design: Prospective, observational study., Setting: Tertiary care university hospital., Participant: Twenty patients undergoing thoracotomy for lung resection., Interventions: In addition to standard monitoring, cardiac output, preload parameters (global diastolic volume, total intrathoracic blood volume, and systolic volume variation), and myocardial contractility (dP(max) and cardiac function index) were measured with an aortic transpulmonary thermodilution technique., Measurements and Main Results: After OLV initiation, a paravertebral lidocaine bolus of 5 mg/kg (2%) caused decreases in the dP(max) and cardiac function index that lasted up to 30 minutes. Accompanying minor reductions in heart rate and systolic blood pressure required no vasoactive drugs and were self-limiting. None of the other hemodynamic parameters studied was significantly altered., Conclusions: In noncardiac patients, TPVB is associated with good hemodynamic stability, despite a small and transient decrease in myocardial contractility that could be related to the drug's systemic effects after its absorption.

Objective: To compare the effects that the use of general intravenous anesthesia (propofol-fentanyl) (GA) or general anesthesia combined with thoracic epidural anesthesia with meperidine (TEA-M) may have on arterial oxygenation during one-lung ventilation (OLV)., Design: Prospective., Setting: Tertiary care hospital., Participants: Seventy-two patients undergoing OLV for thoracic surgery., Interventions: Patients were prospectively randomized into two groups: GA (n = 37) fentanyl, propofol, rocuronium anesthesia was used; and group TEA-M (n = 35) were anesthetized with propofol, rocuronium and thoracic epidural meperidine (2 mg/kg in 10-12 mL) administered before anesthetic induction. A double-lumen endotracheal tube was inserted, and mechanical ventilation with 100% oxygen was used during study. Mean arterial pressure, heart rate and arterial and venous blood gases were recorded with the patients in the lateral decubitus position in three phases: during two-lung ventilation (TLV), 15 and 30 minutes after beginning OLV (OLV + 15 and OLV + 30 respectively). The authors measured arterial and venous central oxygen tension, arterial and venous central oxygen saturation, arterial and venous central oxygen content and venous admixture percentage (Qs/Qt%)., Measurements and Main Results: There were no statistical differences between the two groups for PaO(2) during OLV + 15 (GA = 165 mmHg, TEA-M = 153 mmHg) and OLV + 30 (GA = 176 mmHg, TEA-M = 158 mmHg); and with values for Qs/Qt%., Conclusions: It is concluded that GA combined with TEA-M (2 mg/kg) do not affect arterial oxygenation during OLV in thoracic surgery.