Search

Previous studies show that optimized arrays generated using the ‘Compare R’ method have significantly better resolution than conventional arrays. This method determines the optimum set of arrays by selecting those that give the maximum model resolution. The number of possible arrays (the comprehensive data set) increases with the fourth power of the number of electrodes. The optimization method faces practical limitations for 2-D survey lines with more than 60 electrodes where the number of possible arrays exceeds a million. Several techniques are proposed to reduce the calculation time for such survey lines. A single-precision version of the ‘Compare R’ algorithm using a new ranking function reduces the calculation time by two to eight times while providing results similar to the double-precision version. Recent improvements in computer GPU technology can reduce the calculation time by about seven times. The calculation time is reduced by half by using the fact that arrays that are symmetrical about the center of the line produce identical changes in the model resolution values. It is further reduced by more than thirty times by calculating the Sherman–Morrison update for all the possible two-electrode combinations, which are then used to calculate the model resolution values for the four-electrode arrays. The calculation time is reduced by more then ten times by using a subset of the comprehensive data set consisting of only symmetrical arrays. Tests with a synthetic model and field data set show that optimized arrays derived from this subset produce inversion models with differences of less than 10% from those derived using the full comprehensive data set. The optimized data sets produced models that are more accurate than the Wenner–Schlumberger array data sets in all the tests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Four different methods to automatically select an optimal set of array configurations that gives the maximum subsurface resolution with a limited number of measurements for 2D electrical imaging surveys were tested. The first (CR) method directly calculates the change in the model resolution for each new array added to the base data set, and uses this to select array configurations that gave the maximum model resolution. However this method is the slowest. The algorithm used by the CR method for calculating rank-one updates was optimized to reduce computational time by a factor of eighty. The sequence of calculations was modified to reduce the traffic between the computer main memory and the CPU registers. Further code optimizations were made to take advantage of the parallel processing capabilities of modern CPUs. The second (ETH) and third (BGS) methods use approximations based on the sensitivity values to estimate the change in the model resolution matrix. The ETH and BGS methods, respectively, use the first and second power of the sensitivity values to calculate approximations of the model resolution. Both methods are about an order of magnitude faster than the CR method. The results obtained by the BGS method are significantly better than the ETH method, and it approaches that of the CR method. The fourth method (BGS–CR) uses a combination of the BGS and CR methods. It produces results that are almost identical to the CR method but is several times faster. The different methods were tested using data from synthetic models and field surveys. The models obtained from the inversion of the data sets generated by the four different methods confirm that the models generated by the CR method have the best resolution, followed by the BGS–CR, BGS and ETH methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The optimized ‘Compare R’ (CR) method is considered one of the best algorithms to automatically generate a set of electrode arrays that maximizes the model resolution for electrical resistivity imaging. In its original version, the calculation time to generate a set of arrays, even for a short resistivity line, required several hours. Recently, researchers spent considerable effort to reduce execution time. In addition, other modifications have been made to improve the practical aspects, such as minimizing the electrode polarization effects and incorporating errors in the data. In line with this approach, the effectiveness of the optimized arrays that are generated based on a modified version of ‘Compare-R' optimization algorithm is demonstrated through a comprehensive and quantitative comparison with the conventional Dipole-Dipole (DD) and Wenner-Schlumberger (WS) arrays. Four different synthetic models were generated and noisy data cases were considered. The results show that the optimized array has significantly better resolution and target detail than conventional arrays. This is clear in enhancing the detectability accuracy in the deepest part of the inversion models. Of the conventional arrays, the DD array provides inversion images mostly closely related to the performance of the optimized array models. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]