Search

New developments in mobile resistivity meter instrumentation have made it possible to survey large areas with dense data coverage. The mobile system usually has a limited number of electrodes attached to a cable that is pulled along behind an operator so that a large area can be covered within a short time. Such surveys can produce three‐dimensional datasets with hundreds of thousands of electrodes positions and data points. Similarly, the inverse model used to interpret the data can have several hundred thousand cells. It is impractical to model such large datasets within a reasonable time on microcomputers used by many small companies employing standard inversion techniques. We describe a model segmentation technique that subdivides the finite‐element mesh used to calculate the apparent resistivity and Jacobian matrix values into a number of smaller meshes. A fast technique that optimizes the calculation of the Jacobian matrix values for multi‐channel systems was also developed. A one‐dimensional wavelet transform method was then used to compress the storage of the Jacobian matrix, in turn reducing the computer time and memory required to solve the least‐squares optimization equation to determine the inverse model resistivity values. The new techniques reduce the calculation time and memory required by more than 80% while producing models that differ by less than 1% from that obtained using the standard inversion technique with a single mesh. We present results using a synthetic model and a field dataset that illustrates the effectiveness of the proposed techniques. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Previous studies show that optimized arrays generated using the ‘Compare R’ method have significantly better resolution than conventional arrays. This method determines the optimum set of arrays by selecting those that give the maximum model resolution. The number of possible arrays (the comprehensive data set) increases with the fourth power of the number of electrodes. The optimization method faces practical limitations for 2-D survey lines with more than 60 electrodes where the number of possible arrays exceeds a million. Several techniques are proposed to reduce the calculation time for such survey lines. A single-precision version of the ‘Compare R’ algorithm using a new ranking function reduces the calculation time by two to eight times while providing results similar to the double-precision version. Recent improvements in computer GPU technology can reduce the calculation time by about seven times. The calculation time is reduced by half by using the fact that arrays that are symmetrical about the center of the line produce identical changes in the model resolution values. It is further reduced by more than thirty times by calculating the Sherman–Morrison update for all the possible two-electrode combinations, which are then used to calculate the model resolution values for the four-electrode arrays. The calculation time is reduced by more then ten times by using a subset of the comprehensive data set consisting of only symmetrical arrays. Tests with a synthetic model and field data set show that optimized arrays derived from this subset produce inversion models with differences of less than 10% from those derived using the full comprehensive data set. The optimized data sets produced models that are more accurate than the Wenner–Schlumberger array data sets in all the tests. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT The use of optimized arrays generated using the 'Compare R' method for cross-borehole resistivity measurements is examined in this paper. We compare the performances of two array optimization algorithms, one that maximizes the model resolution and another that minimizes the point spread value. Although both algorithms give similar results, the model resolution maximization algorithm is several times faster. A study of the point spread function plots for a cross-borehole survey shows that the model resolution within the central zone surrounded by the borehole electrodes is much higher than near the bottom end of the boreholes. Tests with synthetic and experimental data show that the optimized arrays generated by the 'Compare R' method have significantly better resolution than a 'standard' measurement sequence used in previous surveys. The resolution of the optimized arrays is less if arrays with both current (or both potential) electrodes in the same borehole are excluded. However, they are still better than the 'standard' arrays. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Time-lapse resistivity surveys are commonly used to monitor temporal changes in the subsurface. In certain cases, it is known from other information that the resistivity will only decrease or increase with time. The 4-D resistivity smoothness-constrained inversion method reduces artifacts due to noise by including a temporal roughness filter constraint that ensures the temporal changes vary in a smooth manner. A least-squares optimization method is used to find a solution by attempting to locate the minimum of an objective function that consists of the data misfit and model (spatial and temporal) roughness. In some cases, the 4-D time-lapse inverse models show an increase in the resistivity with time in parts of the subsurface where it is only expected to decrease (or vice versa). We compare two methods, the barrier function and transformation methods, that attempt to minimize or eliminate these artifacts. We incorporate the barrier function constraint into the 4-D inverse method by using a modified difference matrix as a temporal roughness filter. The barrier function constraint includes an additional term that increases the objective function value greatly if the model values cross the allowed thresholds. This greatly minimizes the artifacts but does not completely eliminate them. It has the advantage that there are minimal changes in the objective function in regions of model space that are not close to the imposed thresholds. The method of transformations changes the model parameter such that the additional positivity or negativity constraints are implicitly included in the transformed model parameter. It has the advantage that it can completely eliminate the artifacts. However, it modifies the entire objective function which could be a disadvantage in some cases. We also explore a combination of the two methods, using the barrier function method to generate an initial model that minimizes the artifacts followed by the transformation method. This hybrid technique completely removes the residual artifacts left by the barrier method, and produces an inverse model which is closer to the true model for a synthetic data set. We also describe a post-inversion modification of the L-curve method to determine the optimum model that takes into account the non-linear nature of the inverse problem and the forward modelling method. The technique gave an estimate of the noise level for a field data set and produced a model which is consistent with independent hydrological measurements at the test site. • 4-D ERT inversion. • Asymmetric time constraints. • Barrier function methods. • Transformation methods. • Post-inversion L-curve analysis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Four different methods to automatically select an optimal set of array configurations that gives the maximum subsurface resolution with a limited number of measurements for 2D electrical imaging surveys were tested. The first (CR) method directly calculates the change in the model resolution for each new array added to the base data set, and uses this to select array configurations that gave the maximum model resolution. However this method is the slowest. The algorithm used by the CR method for calculating rank-one updates was optimized to reduce computational time by a factor of eighty. The sequence of calculations was modified to reduce the traffic between the computer main memory and the CPU registers. Further code optimizations were made to take advantage of the parallel processing capabilities of modern CPUs. The second (ETH) and third (BGS) methods use approximations based on the sensitivity values to estimate the change in the model resolution matrix. The ETH and BGS methods, respectively, use the first and second power of the sensitivity values to calculate approximations of the model resolution. Both methods are about an order of magnitude faster than the CR method. The results obtained by the BGS method are significantly better than the ETH method, and it approaches that of the CR method. The fourth method (BGS–CR) uses a combination of the BGS and CR methods. It produces results that are almost identical to the CR method but is several times faster. The different methods were tested using data from synthetic models and field surveys. The models obtained from the inversion of the data sets generated by the four different methods confirm that the models generated by the CR method have the best resolution, followed by the BGS–CR, BGS and ETH methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The smoothness-constrained least-squares method is widely used for two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) inversion of apparent resistivity data sets. The Gauss–Newton method that recalculates the Jacobian matrix of partial derivatives for all iterations is commonly used to solve the least-squares equation. The quasi-Newton method has also been used to reduce the computer time. In this method, the Jacobian matrix for a homogeneous earth model is used for the first iteration, and the Jacobian matrices for subsequent iterations are estimated by an updating technique. Since the Gauss–Newton method uses the exact partial derivatives, it should require fewer iterations to converge. However, for many data sets, the quasi-Newton method can be significantly faster than the Gauss–Newton method. The effectiveness of a third method that is a combination of the Gauss–Newton and quasi-Newton methods is also examined. In this combined inversion method, the partial derivatives are directly recalculated for the first two or three iterations, and then estimated by a quasi-Newton updating technique for the later iterations.The three different inversion methods are tested with a number of synthetic and field data sets. In areas with moderate (less than 10:1) subsurface resistivity contrasts, the inversion models obtained by the three methods are similar. In areas with large resistivity contrasts, the Gauss–Newton method gives significantly more accurate results than the quasi-Newton method. However, even for large resistivity contrasts, the differences in the models obtained by the Gauss–Newton method and the combined inversion method are small. As the combined inversion method is faster than the Gauss–Newton method, it represents a satisfactory compromise between speed and accuracy for many data sets. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Internal erosion is one of the major reasons for embankment dam failures. Despite this, the knowledge of the temporal development of internal erosion in full scale structures is limited. Detection of internal erosion is complicated using conventional methods, and new or improved methods are appreciated. Hällby was the first Swedish embankment to get a permanently installed monitoring system intended for resistivity measurements. Daily measurements started to take place already in late 1996, which make these long term monitoring data unique. This paper includes examples of long term time series from Hällby along with some evaluation and interpretation techniques used when analysing such monitoring data. Time-lapse inversion was used to focus the variation over time and suppress artefacts due to the resistivity structure. Seasonal resistivity variations inside the dam are obvious. Increasing long term resistivity has been noticed in a particular zone in the left embankment. This zone also exhibits larger seasonal variations relative to other parts of the dam, and the variations are increasing. The observations may relate to an ongoing internal erosion process in the dam. The long term change may be indicative of a change in material properties, and the large and increasing variations may reflect higher and increasing seepage levels. In the years 2004 to 2006 the dam was upgraded and the resistivity system reinstalled. The results indicate that resistivity monitoring may have a chance of detecting development of internal erosion at an early stage. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]