Search

Purpose: In postmenopausal women, optimizing muscular strength and physical performance through proper resistance training (RT) is crucial in achieving optimal functional reserve later in life. This study aimed to compare if a higher-load-to-lower-load (HL-to-LL) scheme is more effective than a lower-load-to-higher-load (LL-to-HL) scheme on muscular strength and physical performance in postmenopausal women after 12 and 24 wk of RT., Methods: Twenty-four postmenopausal women were randomized into two groups: LL-to-HL ( n = 12, 27-31 repetitions maximum (RM) in the first 12 wk, and 8-12RM in the last 12 wk) or HL-to-LL ( n = 12, 8-12RM during the first 12 wk, and 27-31RM in the last 12 wk). Muscular dynamic (1RM test) and isometric strength (MIVC) and functional tests (sit-to-stand power, 400-m walking, and 6-min walking) were analyzed at baseline, after 12 and 24 wk., Results: Different load intensity transition schemes resulted in enhancements ( P < 0.05) in dynamic (45° leg press: LL-to-HL = 21.98% vs HL-to-LL = 16.07%; leg extension: LL-to-HL = 23.25% vs HL-to-LL = 16.28%; leg curl: LL-to-HL = 23.89% vs HL-to-LL = 13.34%) and isometric strength (LL-to-HL = 14.63% vs HL-to-LL = 19.42%), sit-to-stand power (LL-to-HL = 7.32% vs HL-to-LL = 0%), and walking speed (400-m test: LL-to-HL = 3.30% vs HL-to-LL = 5.52%; 6-min test: LL-to-HL = 4.44% vs HL-to-LL = 5.55%) after 24 wk of RT, without differences between groups ( P > 0.05). However, only the HL increased the dynamic strength in 45° leg press and leg extension and sit-to-stand power. Moreover, walking speed changes were more strongly correlated with the changes in MIVC ( P < 0.05)., Conclusions: Our results indicate that both load intensity transition schemes produce similar improvements in muscular strength and physical performance in postmenopausal women after 24 wk of RT. However, the HL was more effective in increasing 45° leg press and leg extension strength, as well as power (mainly when performed after the LL), whereas having little effect on leg curl strength, isometric strength, and walking speed. Our findings suggest that although an HL makes a muscle isotonically stronger, it may have limited impact on isometric strength and walking speed in postmenopausal women., (Copyright © 2023 by the American College of Sports Medicine.)

Abstract: Carneiro, MAS, de Oliveira Júnior, GN, de Sousa, JFR, Murta, EFC, Orsatti, CL, Michelin, MA, Cyrino, ES, and Orsatti, FL. Effects of resistance training at different loads on inflammatory biomarkers, muscle mass, muscular strength, and physical performance in postmenopausal women. J Strength Cond Res 36(6): 1582-1590, 2022-It has been suggested that the effect of resistance training (RT) on circulating proinflammatory biomarkers may be dependent on muscle mass gain. A few recent studies have suggested that lower-load RT (LLRT; loads <50% of 1 repetition maximum [1RM] and repetition performed until, or close to, voluntary concentric failure) may be superior to higher-load RT (HLRT; loads >70% of 1RM) in increasing muscle mass. Hence, this study aimed to test whether LLRT is superior to HLRT for increasing muscle mass (total fat-free mass [TFFM] and leg fat-free mass [LFFM]) and improving circulating inflammatory biomarkers (interleukin [IL]-6, IL1-ra, tumor necrosis factor [TNF]-α, and extracellular heat shock protein [eHSP]70) in postmenopausal women (PW) (primary outcome). The secondary outcome was to compare the changes in muscular strength and physical performance (4-meter walking test [4-M], timed-up-and-go [TUG] test, and sit-to-stand [STS] test) between the LLRT and HLRT. The PW were randomized into 2 groups: LLRT (n = 14; loads necessary to perform 30-35 repetitions) and HLRT (n = 15; loads necessary to perform 8-12 repetitions). The greater magnitude of increase in LFFM (p = 0.033) was observed in LLRT when compared with HLRT. Moreover, there was a trend for a greater increase in TFFM in LLRT over HLRT (p = 0.070). However, there were similar improvements in TNF-α and muscular strength (p < 0.001). Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the RT schemes on IL-6, IL-1ra, and eHSP70 levels. Thus, although performing LLRT until, or close to, voluntary concentric failure seems to provide a greater stimulus for an increase in muscle mass than HLRT, it does not seem to affect the responses in circulating inflammatory biomarkers, muscular strength, and physical performance in PW., (Copyright © 2020 National Strength and Conditioning Association.)

Abstract: Nascimento de Oliveira Júnior, G, de Freitas Rodrigues de Sousa, J, Augusto da Silva Carneiro, M, Martins, FM, Santagnello, SB, Campos Souza, MV, and Orsatti, FL. Resistance training volume enhances muscle hypertrophy, but not strength in postmenopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. J Strength Cond Res 36(5): 1216-1221, 2022-Among several possible resistance training (RT) variables to be manipulated, the training volume has been considered as a critical variable to maximize RT-induced hypertrophy. Many of the studies that compared one set of RT with 3 sets have failed to show a difference in muscle hypertrophy in older adults. However, it is not clear whether further increases in RT volume (i.e., 6 sets) would result in even greater RT-related hypertrophy than 3 sets in older adults. This study aimed to investigate whether higher-volume RT (HV-RT) maximizes gains in lean body mass and muscle strength (MS) when compared with lower-volume RT (LV-RT) in postmenopausal women (PW). Fifty-eight PW were randomized into 1 of the 3 groups: control group (CT, no exercise), HV-RT (6 sets per exercise), and LV-RT (3 sets per exercise). Volunteers took part in a supervised training program (leg press 45°, leg extension, leg curl and standing calf raises) and were assessed for leg lean mass (LLM; dual X-ray absorptiometry) and lower limb MS (leg press and leg extension; 1 repetition maximum [1RM]) before and after 12 weeks of RT. Both HV-RT and LV-RT groups increased (p < 0.05) LLM and MS when compared with the CT group. Higher increases in LLM gains were observed for the HV-RT group when compared with the LV-RT group (6.1 and 2.3%, p < 0.001). Both HV-RT and LV-RT groups similarly increased 1RM in the leg press and leg extension. Thus, there seems to be a dose-response relationship between RT volume and muscle hypertrophy, but not for MS gains in PW., (Copyright © 2020 National Strength and Conditioning Association.)

The primary purpose of this study was to identify the impact of whole-body resistance training (RT) at different load intensities on adipokines, adhesion molecules, and extracellular heat shock proteins in postmenopausal women. As secondary purpose, we analyzed the impact of RT at different load intensities on body fat, muscular strength, and physical performance. Forty participants were randomized into lower-load intensity RT (LIRT, n = 20, 30-35 repetition maximum in the first set of each exercise) or higher-load intensity RT (HIRT, n = 20, 8-12 repetition maximum in the first set of each exercise). Adipokines (adiponectin and leptin), adhesion molecules (MCP-1 and ICAM-1), extracellular heat shock proteins (HO-1 and eHSP60), body fat, muscular strength (1RM), and physical performance [400-meter walking test (400-M) and 6-minute walking test (6MWT)] were analyzed at baseline and after 12-weeks RT. There was a significant time-by-group interaction for eHSP60 ( P = 0.049) and 400-M ( P = 0.003), indicating superiority of HIRT ( d = 0.47 and 0.55). However, both groups similarly improved adiponectin, ICAM-1, HO-1, body fat, 1RM, and 6MWT ( P < 0.05). Our study suggests that load intensity does not seem to determine the RT effect on several obesity-related pro-inflammatory and chemotactic compounds, body fat, 1RM, and 6MWT in postmenopausal women, although a greater improvement has been revealed for eHSP60 and 400-M in HIRT. Novelty: Higher-load intensity resistance training improves eHSP60 and 400-M in postmenopausal women. Resistance training improves the inflammatory profile, body fat, muscle strength, and 6MWT, regardless of load intensity.

Menopause transition may impair muscle function, decreasing exercise tolerance. The torque-duration relationship (hyperbolic curve) forms a practical framework within which exercise tolerance may be explored. In this regard, resistance training (RT) increases the curvature constant of this relationship (W'). Muscle hypertrophy and strength gains have been suggested as possible mediators of RT-induced improvement in W', however, it is unclear what the main mediator is. Higher-volume RT (HV-RT), beyond that recommended by RT-guidelines (i.e. three sets per exercise), may promote greater hypertrophy, but not higher strength gains. Hence, this study aimed to investigate whether greater hypertrophy in HV-RT maximises W' gain when compared to LVRT in postmenopausal women (PW). Fifty-eight PW were randomised to the control group (CTRL), HV-RT (six sets per exercise) or LV-RT (three sets per exercise). They underwent a 12-week RT program and were assessed for W', thigh lean body mass (TLBM) and maximal isometric voluntary contraction (MIVC). The TLBM gain was higher ( P  < 0.001) in the HV-RT (9.4%) than LV-RT (3.7%). However, both HV-RT and LV-RT similarly increased MIVC (9.7% vs. 16.5%, P  = 0.063) and W' (26.4% vs. 34.6% P  = 0.163). Additionally, the changes in W' were associated with the changes in TLBM (31%, P  = 0.003) and MIVC (52%, P = <0.001). However, when the changes in TLBM and MIVC were inserted into the predictive model, only the MIVC (33%, P  = 0.002) was a predictor of W'. Thus, although HV-RT promoted greater hypertrophy than LV-RT, HV-RT does not seem to maximise W' in PW.

Purpose: The torque–duration relationship in muscle group exercise is characterized by two parameters, the critical torque (CT) and the W prime (Wʹ), which define the limit of tolerance. These parameters have significant utility in assessing health and disease. However, there is a lack of information regarding the optimization of CT and/or Wʹ gains through manipulation of resistance training (RT) variables, especially in older adults. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the impact of different intensities of RT, specifically higher intensity RT (HIRT) versus lower intensity RT (LIRT), on CT and Wʹ in postmenopausal women. Methods: The study spanned 12 weeks of RT. Postmenopausal women were randomized into three groups: control group (CG, n = 14), LIRT (loads necessary to perform 27–31 repetitions, n = 17), and HIRT (loads necessary to perform 8–12 repetitions, n = 14). Results: Compared to the CG group, the LIRT group exhibited a significant increase in CT (15%, P < 0.05), while the HIRT group showed a significant increase in Wʹ (36%, P < 0.05). Conclusions: Different intensities of RT result in distinct adaptations of torque–duration relationship parameters (Wʹ and CT) in postmenopausal women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This systematic review with meta-analysis aimed to compare the changes caused by exercise intervention with those provoked by usual care on physical function biomarkers in older adults immediately after hospital discharge. Two independent authors performed a systematic search (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and SciELO) of studies published from database inception until August 2021. Randomized clinical trials investigating the effects of an exercise intervention compared to usual care were included. The Cochrane Collaboration assessment tool was used to analyze the risk of bias. The comparisons included handgrip strength, the short physical performance battery scale, six-minute walking test, and 10-m gait speed. Overall, the exercise intervention led to significantly greater changes compared to usual care in physical function biomarkers [standard mean difference = 0.89, 95% CI = 0.39, 1.42; P = 0.001]. However, considering the very few studies investigating each variable separately, our sub-analysis did not reveal a significant effect of the exercise intervention on handgrip strength, the short physical performance battery, six minutes walking test, and 10-m gait speed. This systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials suggests that exercise intervention induce greater physical function biomarker alterations in older adults after hospitalization than usual care including physical activity guidance. Future trials comparing the effects of these intervention groups on physical function biomarkers in this population are needed to confirm our results. Potential mechanism involved in mitigating impairments in physiological resilience and declines in physical function biomarkers induced by exercise interventions in older adults after hospital discharge. [Display omitted] • Acute hospitalization causes an impact dramatic and permanent on physical function biomarkers during hospital-based care. • Vulnerability conferred by hospitalization in older adults leads to impairment in these biomarkers also after discharge. • Exercise intervention is better than usual care to improve physical function biomarkers in older adults after discharge. • Exercise intervention might help older adults recover from adverse effects caused by hospitalization also after discharge. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]