1. Individual Differences in the Context-Dependent Recruitment of Cognitive Control: Evidence From Action Versus State Orientation.
- Author
-
Fischer, Rico, Plessow, Franziska, Dreisbach, Gesine, and Goschke, Thomas
- Subjects
- *
SELF-control , *SPATIAL orientation , *CONFLICT (Psychology) , *INDIVIDUAL differences , *PSYCHOLOGICAL adaptation , *COGNITION , *PSYCHOLOGY , *CONTROL (Psychology) , *ANALYSIS of variance , *STATISTICAL correlation , *EXPERIMENTAL design , *PERSONALITY , *PROBABILITY theory , *REACTION time , *REGRESSION analysis , *RESEARCH funding , *DESCRIPTIVE statistics - Abstract
The ability to flexibly adapt to deviations from optimal performance is an important aspect of self-control. In the present study, the authors present first evidence that the personality trait action versus state orientation ( Kuhl, 2000) modulates the ability of adaptive control adjustments in response to experienced conflicts. Sixty-two German individuals with extreme scores on the action-state dimension performed a response interference task, that is, 31 extreme action-oriented individuals (30 females; Mage = 20.35 years) and 31 extreme state-oriented individuals (20 females; Mage = 23.23 years), respectively. Action-oriented individuals displayed a stronger conflict adaptation effect as evidenced by a stronger reduction of interference on trials following conflict. These results were further corroborated by a correlational analysis including a sample of 105 participants: the higher the score on the action-state dimension, the lower the interference effect following conflict (i.e., stronger conflict adaptation). The results provide evidence that even low-level, bottom-up-driven processes of self-control such as conflict adaptation are systematically moderated by individual differences in control modes and provide insights into the cognitive mechanisms underlying action versus state orientation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF