Search

The worldwide number of performed bariatric surgeries is increasing continuously, whereas laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) and sleeve gastrectomy are conducted most frequently. Alongside with the usual post-operative and metabolic complications, luminal complications such as anastomotic bleeding, ulceration, leakage, fistula formation, enlargement and stenosis of the anastomosis may occur. Evolution of interventional endoscopy frequently allows endoscopic management of complications, avoiding surgical interventions in most cases. Here, we review the various luminal complications after bariatric surgery with a focus on their endoscopic management., (© 2017 World Obesity Federation.)

Background and Study Aims: Classic endoscopic resection techniques (EMR and ESD) are limited to mucosal lesions. In the case of deeper growth into the gut wall and anatomic sites prone to perforation, the novel full-thickness resection device (FTRD®) opens a new dimension of possibilities for endoscopic resection.Patients and Methods: Sixty patients underwent endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) at our institution. Safety, learning curve, R0 resection rate, and clinical outcome were studied.Results: In 97% (58/60) of the interventions, the FTRD®-mounted endoscope reached the previously marked lesion and eFTR was performed (technical success). Full-thickness resection was achieved in 88% of the cases, with an R0 resection on histological examination in 79%. The clinical success rate based on follow-up histology was even higher (88%). Adverse events occurred in 7%. Appendicitis of the residual cecal appendix after eFTR of an adenoma arising in the appendix led to the only post-eFTR surgery (1/58, 2%). Minor bleeding at the eFTR site (2/58, 3%) and an eFTR performed accidently without proper prior deployment of the OTSC® (1/58, 2%) were successfully treated endoscopically. There was no secondary perforation or eFTR-associated mortality.Conclusions: After specific training, eFTR is a feasible, safe, and promising all-in-one endoscopic resection technique. Our data show that eFTR allows complete resection of lesions affecting layers of the gut wall beneath the mucosa with a low risk of adverse events. However, our preliminary results need to be confirmed in larger, controlled studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Study Aims: Classic endoscopic resection techniques (EMR and ESD) are limited to mucosal lesions. In the case of deeper growth into the gut wall and anatomic sites prone to perforation, the novel full-thickness resection device (FTRD®) opens a new dimension of possibilities for endoscopic resection.Patients and Methods: Sixty patients underwent endoscopic full-thickness resection (eFTR) at our institution. Safety, learning curve, R0 resection rate, and clinical outcome were studied.Results: In 97% (58/60) of the interventions, the FTRD®-mounted endoscope reached the previously marked lesion and eFTR was performed (technical success). Full-thickness resection was achieved in 88% of the cases, with an R0 resection on histological examination in 79%. The clinical success rate based on follow-up histology was even higher (88%). Adverse events occurred in 7%. Appendicitis of the residual cecal appendix after eFTR of an adenoma arising in the appendix led to the only post-eFTR surgery (1/58, 2%). Minor bleeding at the eFTR site (2/58, 3%) and an eFTR performed accidently without proper prior deployment of the OTSC® (1/58, 2%) were successfully treated endoscopically. There was no secondary perforation or eFTR-associated mortality.Conclusions: After specific training, eFTR is a feasible, safe, and promising all-in-one endoscopic resection technique. Our data show that eFTR allows complete resection of lesions affecting layers of the gut wall beneath the mucosa with a low risk of adverse events. However, our preliminary results need to be confirmed in larger, controlled studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]