Search

Background: Because stroke prevention is a major goal in the management of ESKD hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation, investigating racial/ethnic disparities in stroke among such patients is important to those who could benefit from strategies to maximize preventive measures., Methods: We used the United States Renal Data System to identify ESKD patients who initiated hemodialysis from 2006 to 2013 and then identified those with a subsequent atrial fibrillation diagnosis and Medicare Part A/B/D. Patients were followed for 1 year for all-cause stroke, mortality, prescription medications, and cardiovascular disease procedures. The survival mediational g-formula quantified the percentage of excess strokes attributable to lower use of atrial fibrillation treatments by race/ethnicity., Results: The study included 56,587 ESKD hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation. Black, white, Hispanic, and Asian patients accounted for 19%, 69%, 8%, and 3% of the population, respectively. Compared with white patients, black, Hispanic, or Asian patients were more likely to experience stroke (13%, 15%, and 16%, respectively) but less likely to fill a warfarin prescription (10%, 17%, and 28%, respectively). Warfarin prescription was associated with decreased stroke rates. Analyses suggested that equalizing the warfarin distribution to that in the white population would prevent 7%, 10%, and 12% of excess strokes among black, Hispanic, and Asian patients, respectively. We found no racial/ethnic disparities in all-cause mortality or use of cardiovascular disease procedures., Conclusions: Racial/ethnic disparities in all-cause stroke among hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation are partially mediated by lower use of anticoagulants among black, Hispanic, and Asian patients. The reasons for these disparities are unknown, but strategies to maximize stroke prevention in minority hemodialysis populations should be further investigated., (Copyright © 2020 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Background: The opioid epidemic is a public health emergency and appropriate medication prescription for pain remains challenging. Physicians have increasingly prescribed gabapentinoids for pain despite limited evidence supporting their use. We determined the prevalence of concomitant gabapentinoid and opioid prescriptions and evaluated their associations with outcomes among dialysis patients., Methods: We used the United States Renal Data System to identify patients treated with dialysis with Part A, B, and D coverage for all of 2010. Patients were grouped into 4 categories of drugs exposure status in 2010: (1) no prescriptions of either an opioid or gabapentinoid, (2) ≥1 prescription of an opioid and no prescriptions of gabapentinoids, (3) no prescriptions of an opioid and ≥1 prescription of gabapenbtinoids, (4) ≥1 prescription of both an opioid and gabapentinoid. Outcomes included 2-year all-cause death, dialysis discontinuation, and hospitalizations assessed in 2011 and 2012., Results: The study population included 153,758 dialysis patients. Concomitant prescription of an opioid and gabapentin (15%) was more common than concomitant prescription of an opioid and pregabalin (4%). In adjusted analyses, concomitant prescription of an opioid and gabapentin compared to no prescription of either was associated with increased risk of death (hazard ratio [HR] 1.16, 95% CI 1.12-1.19), dialysis discontinuation (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03-1.27), and hospitalization (HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.31-1.36). Concomitant prescription of an opioid and pregabalin compared to no prescription of either was associated with increased mortality (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.16-1.28) and hospitalization (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.33-1.41), but not dialysis discontinuation (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.95-1.35). Prescription of opioids and gabepentinoids compared to only being prescribed opioids was associated with higher risk of hospitalizations, but not mortality, or dialysis discontinuation., Conclusions: Concomitant prescription of opioids and gabapentinoids among US dialysis patients is common, and both drugs have independent effects on outcomes. Future research should prospectively investigate the potential harms of such drugs and identify safer alternatives for treatment of pain in end-stage renal disease patients., (© 2020 Published by S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objectives: The association of race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic factors with survival rates of nursing home (NH) residents with treated end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is unclear. We examined whether race/ethnicity, ZIP code-level, and individual-level indicators of poverty relate to mortality of NH residents on dialysis., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Participants/setting: Using the United States Renal Data System database, we identified 56,194 nursing home residents initiated on maintenance dialysis from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2013, followed until May 31, 2014., Measurements: We evaluated baseline characteristics of the NH cohort on dialysis, including race and ethnicity. We assessed the Medicare-Medicaid dual eligibility status as an indicator of individual-level poverty and ZIP code-level median household income (MHI) data. We conducted Cox regression analyses with all-cause mortality as the outcome variable, adjusted for clinical and sociodemographic factors including end-of-life preferences., Results: Adjusted Cox analysis showed a significantly lower risk of death among black vs nonblack NH residents [adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.89, 0.94]. Dual-eligibility status was significantly associated with lower risk of death compared to those with Medicare alone (AHR 0.80, 95% CI 0.78, 0.82). Compared to those in higher MHI quintile levels, NH ESRD patients in the lowest quintile were significantly associated with higher risk of death (AHR 1.09, 95% CI 1.06, 1.13)., Conclusions/implications: Black and Hispanic NH residents on dialysis had an apparent survival advantage. This "survival paradox" occurs despite well-documented racial/ethnic disparities in ESRD and NH care and warrants further exploration that could generate new insights into means of improving survival of all NH residents on dialysis. Area-level indicator of poverty was independently associated with mortality, whereas dual-eligibility status for Medicare and Medicaid was associated with lower risk of death, which could be partly explained by improved access to care., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Data from clinical trials to inform practice in maintenance hemodialysis are limited. Incorporating randomized trials into dialysis clinical care delivery should help generate practice-guiding evidence, but the feasibility of this approach has not been established., Methods: To develop approaches for embedding trials into routine delivery of maintenance hemodialysis, we performed a cluster-randomized, pragmatic trial demonstration project, the Time to Reduce Mortality in ESRD (TiME) trial, evaluating effects of session duration on mortality (primary outcome) and hospitalization rate. Dialysis facilities randomized to the intervention adopted a default session duration ≥4.25 hours (255 minutes) for incident patients; those randomized to usual care had no trial-driven approach to session duration. Implementation was highly centralized, with no on-site research personnel and complete reliance on clinically acquired data. We used multiple strategies to engage facility personnel and participating patients., Results: The trial enrolled 7035 incident patients from 266 dialysis units. We discontinued the trial at a median follow-up of 1.1 years because of an inadequate between-group difference in session duration. For the primary analysis population (participants with estimated body water ≤42.5 L), mean session duration was 216 minutes for the intervention group and 207 minutes for the usual care group. We found no reduction in mortality or hospitalization rate for the intervention versus usual care., Conclusions: Although a highly pragmatic design allowed efficient enrollment, data acquisition, and monitoring, intervention uptake was insufficient to determine whether longer hemodialysis sessions improve outcomes. More effective strategies for engaging clinical personnel and patients are likely required to evaluate clinical trial interventions that are fully embedded in care delivery., (Copyright © 2019 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Rationale & Objective: Diabetic patients with declining kidney function are at heightened risk for hypoglycemia. We sought to determine whether hypoglycemia-related hospitalizations in the interval before dialysis therapy initiation are associated with post-end-stage renal disease (ESRD) mortality among incident patients with ESRD with diabetes., Study Design: Observational cohort study., Setting & Participants: US veterans from the national Veterans Affairs database with diabetes and chronic kidney disease transitioning to dialysis therapy from October 2007 to September 2011., Exposure: Hypoglycemia-related hospitalizations during the pre-ESRD period and antidiabetic medication regimens., Outcome: The outcome of post-ESRD all-cause mortality was evaluated relative to pre-ESRD hypoglycemia. The outcome of pre-ESRD hypoglycemia-related hospitalization was evaluated relative to antidiabetic medication regimens., Analytic Approach: We examined whether the occurrence and frequency of pre-ESRD hypoglycemia-related hospitalizations are associated with post-ESRD mortality using Cox regression models adjusted for case-mix covariates. In a subcohort of patients prescribed 0 to 2 oral antidiabetic drugs and/or insulin, we examined the 12 most commonly prescribed antidiabetic medication regimens and risk for pre-ESRD hypoglycemia-related hospitalization using logistic regression models adjusted for case-mix covariates., Results: Among 30,156 patients who met eligibility criteria, the occurrence of pre-ESRD hypoglycemia-related hospitalization(s) was associated with higher post-ESRD mortality risk: adjusted HR (aHR), 1.25; 95% CI, 1.17-1.34 (reference group: no hypoglycemia hospitalization). Increasing frequency of hypoglycemia-related hospitalizations was independently associated with incrementally higher mortality risk: aHRs of 1.21 (95% CI, 1.12-1.30), 1.47 (95% CI, 1.19-1.82), and 2.07 (95% CI, 1.46-2.95) for 1, 2, and 3 or more hypoglycemia-related hospitalizations, respectively (reference group: no hypoglycemia hospitalization). Compared with patients who were prescribed neither oral antidiabetic drugs nor insulin, medication regimens that included sulfonylureas and/or insulin were associated with higher risk for hypoglycemia., Limitations: Residual confounding cannot be excluded., Conclusions: Among incident patients with ESRD with diabetes, a dose-dependent relationship between frequency of pre-ESRD hypoglycemia-related hospitalizations and post-ESRD mortality was observed. Further study of diabetic management strategies that prevent hypoglycemia as patients with chronic kidney disease transition to ESRD are warranted., (Copyright © 2018 National Kidney Foundation, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To develop and validate a risk prediction model that would help individualize treatment and improve the shared decision-making process between clinicians and patients., Patients and Methods: We developed a risk prediction tool for mortality during the first year of dialysis based on pre-end-stage renal disease characteristics in a cohort of 35,878 US veterans with incident end-stage renal disease who transitioned to dialysis treatment between October 1, 2007, and March 31, 2014 and then externally validated this tool among 4284 patients in the Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) health care system who transitioned to dialysis treatment between January 1, 2007, and September 30, 2015., Results: To ensure model goodness of fit, 2 separate models were selected for patients whose last estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) before dialysis initiation was less than 15 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 or 15 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 or higher. Model discrimination in the internal validation cohort of veterans resulted in C statistics of 0.71 (95% CI, 0.70-0.72) and 0.66 (95% CI, 0.65-0.67) among patients with eGFR lower than 15 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 and 15 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 or higher, respectively. In the KPSC external validation cohort, the developed risk score exhibited C statistics of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.74-0.79) in men and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.71-0.76) in women with eGFR lower than 15 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.67-0.74) in men and 0.67 (95% CI, 0.62-0.72) in women with eGFR of 15 mL/min per 1.73 m 2 or higher., Conclusion: A new risk prediction tool for mortality during the first year after transition to dialysis (available at www.DialysisScore.com) was developed in the large national Veterans Affairs cohort and validated with good performance in the racially, ethnically, and gender diverse KPSC cohort. This risk prediction tool will help identify high-risk populations and guide management strategies at the transition to dialysis., (Copyright © 2018 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aggressive pain treatment was advocated for ESRD patients, but new Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines recommend cautious opioid prescription. Little is known regarding outcomes associated with ESRD opioid prescription. We assessed opioid prescriptions and associations between opioid prescription and dose and patient outcomes using 2006-2010 US Renal Data System information in patients on maintenance dialysis with Medicare Part A, B, and D coverage in each study year ( n =671,281, of whom 271,285 were unique patients). Opioid prescription was confirmed from Part D prescription claims. In the 2010 prevalent cohort ( n =153,758), we examined associations of opioid prescription with subsequent all-cause death, dialysis discontinuation, and hospitalization controlled for demographics, comorbidity, modality, and residence. Overall, >60% of dialysis patients had at least one opioid prescription every year. Approximately 20% of patients had a chronic (≥90-day supply) opioid prescription each year, in 2010 usually for hydrocodone, oxycodone, or tramadol. In the 2010 cohort, compared with patients without an opioid prescription, patients with short-term (1-89 days) and chronic opioid prescriptions had increased mortality, dialysis discontinuation, and hospitalization. All opioid drugs associated with mortality; most associated with worsened morbidity. Higher opioid doses correlated with death in a monotonically increasing fashion. We conclude that opioid drug prescription is associated with increased risk of death, dialysis discontinuation, and hospitalization in dialysis patients. Causal relationships cannot be inferred, and opioid prescription may be an illness marker. Efforts to treat pain effectively in patients on dialysis yet decrease opioid prescriptions and dose deserve consideration., (Copyright © 2017 by the American Society of Nephrology.)

Background: Previous reports showed an increased early mortality after chronic dialysis initiation among the end-stage renal disease (ESRD) population. We hypothesized that ESRD patients in the Military Health System (MHS) would have greater access to pre-ESRD care and hence better survival rates during this early high-risk period., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, using the US Renal Data System database, we identified 1,256,640 patients initiated on chronic dialysis from January 2, 2004 through December 31, 2014, from which a bootstrap sample of 3,984 non-MHS incident dialysis patients were compared with 996 MHS patients. We assessed care by a nephrologist and dietitian, erythropoietin administration, and vascular access use at dialysis initiation as well as all-cause mortality as outcome variables., Results: MHS patients were significantly more likely to have had pre-ESRD nephrology care (adjusted OR [aOR] 2.9; 95% CI 2.3-3.7) and arteriovenous fistula used at dialysis initiation (aOR 2.2; 95% CI 1.7-2.7). Crude mortality rates peaked between the 4th and the 8th week for both cohorts but were reduced among MHS patients. The baseline adjusted Cox model showed significantly lower death rates among MHS vs. non-MHS patients at 6, 9, and 12 months. This survival advantage among MHS patients was attenuated after further adjustment for pre-ESRD nephrology care and dialysis vascular access., Conclusions: MHS patients had improved survival within the first 12 months compared to the general ESRD population, which may be explained in part by differences in pre-ESRD nephrology care and vascular access types., (© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Background: The impact of socioeconomic factors on arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation in hemodialysis (HD) patients is not well understood. We assessed the association of area and individual-level indicators of poverty and health care insurance on AVF use among incident end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients initiated on HD., Methods: In this retrospective cohort study using the United States Renal Data System database, we identified 669,206 patients initiated on maintenance HD from January 1, 2007 through December 31, 2012. We assessed the Medicare-Medicaid dual-eligibility status as an indicator of individual-level poverty and ZIP code-level median household income (MHI) data obtained from the 2010 United States Census. We conducted logistic regression of AVF use at start of dialysis as the outcome variable., Results: The proportions of dual-eligible and non-dual-eligible patients who initiated HD with an AVF were 12.53 and 16.17%, respectively (p<0.001). Dual eligibility was associated with significantly lower likelihood of AVF use upon initiation of HD (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.91; 95% CI 0.90-0.93). Patients in the lowest area-level MHI quintile had an aOR of 0.97 (95% CI 0.95-0.99) compared to those in higher quintile levels. However, dual eligibility and area-level MHI were not significant in patients with Veterans Affairs (VA) coverage., Conclusions: Individual- and area-level measures of poverty were independently associated with a lower likelihood of AVF use at the start of HD, the only exception being patients with VA health care benefits. Efforts to improve incident AVF use may require focusing on pre-ESRD care to be successful., (© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Introduction: The Dialysis Access Consortium (DAC) study group previously reported that treatment with extended-release dipyridamole plus aspirin (DASA) resulted in a significant but clinically modest improvement in primary unassisted arteriovenous graft (AVG) patency. Utilizing DAC published data, the objective of this study is to evaluate the cost effectiveness of antiplatelet interventions aimed at preventing loss of primary AVG patency in hemodialysis (HD) patients., Methods: We performed a cost-utility analysis, using a decision analysis tree model with a 12-month time horizon and a third party payer perspective. Interventions included DASA with and without concurrent aspirin, aspirin alone, and no prophylaxis. The modeled population was defined as adult (≥ 18 years of age) end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients who had undergone placement of a new AVG in the United States. The outcomes were costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, and net monetary benefit. Probabilities were based upon published studies performed by the DAC Study Group while costs of medications and procedures were drawn from public sources. Utilities of health states were derived from published reports and the Short Form 6D (SF-6D) instrument., Results: Aspirin alone is the most cost effective strategy for AVG pharmacologic prophylaxis, as compared to no prophylaxis or DASA with or without concurrent aspirin. The results are robust on multiple scenario analyses using both deterministic and Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analyses. Accounting for both costs and QALY, using aspirin alone to prevent AVG thrombosis can potentially reduce healthcare costs by $24,679,412 per year compared to no aspirin use, at a willingness-to-pay of $50,000/ QALY., Conclusions: Aspirin monotherapy compared favorably to other strategies based on cost per QALY. Our findings support the use of aspirin prophylaxis in HD patients with a new AVG who do not have a contraindication to aspirin.

Purpose: Incident arteriovenous fistula (AVF) rates remain low. AVF placement is often not attempted because of small cephalic vein (CV) diameter. We postulated that isometric handgrip exercises would increase forearm CV diameter and allow successful AVF creation in non-AVF candidates., Methods: Adult subjects without prior vascular access (eGFR<25 mL/min/1.73 m²; CV<2.5 mm) were prospectively enrolled. They performed daily handgrip exercises in the preferred access arm (EA), with the nonexercised arm (NEA) as control. Adherence was assessed by exercise logs and grip strength. CV diameter was measured at baseline, four and eight weeks by ultrasound. The primary endpoint was the mean increase in CV diameter. Secondary endpoints were mean CV diameter increase from baseline, increased proportion of potential AVF sites and successful AVF placement., Results: A total of 17 subjects were enrolled and 15 completed the study. EA grip strength increased significantly. Mean CV diameter increased in both the EA and NEA by 0.48-0.59 and 0.71-0.81 mm (P=NS), respectively. Compared to baseline, all CV diameters increased significantly (P<.05) after four weeks. In the EA, mean distal and proximal CV increased from 1.66 to 2.13 mm and from 2.22 to 2.81 mm, respectively. Similar changes were noted in the NEA. There were also significant increases in the number of sites and subjects eligible for AVF creation. Five subjects had successful AVF placement., Conclusions: Isometric handgrip exercises resulted in significant CV diameter increases after four weeks, in both the EA and the NEA and potentially allows for AVF creation in those not previously deemed candidates.

A higher proportion of patients initiate hemodialysis (HD) with an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) in countries with universal health care systems compared with the United States. Because federally sponsored national health care organizations in the United States, such as the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) and the Department of Defense (DoD), are similar to a universal health care model, we studied AVF use within these organizations. We used the US Renal Data System database to perform a cross-sectional analysis of patients who initiated HD between 2005 and 2006. Patients who received predialysis nephrology care had 10-fold greater odds of initiating dialysis with an AVF (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 10.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 9.6 to 11.1). DVA/DoD insurance also independently associated with initiating HD with an AVF (aOR 1.4; 95% CI 1.2 to 1.5). Fewer patients initiated HD at a DoD facility, but these patients were also approximately twice as likely to use an AVF (aOR 2.3; 95% CI 1.2 to 4.6). In conclusion, patients in DVA/DoD systems are significantly more likely to use an AVF at initiation of HD than patients with other insurance types, including Medicare. Further study of these federal systems may identify practices that could improve processes of care across health care systems to increase the number of patients who initiate HD with an AVF.

Background: The incidence of new-onset diabetes after initiation of hemodialysis (NODAD) and its impact on survival is not known., Methods: We used data from the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) from January 2000 to December 2001, with at least 3 years of follow-up for this study. Patients aged 18-80 years were included. NODAD was defined as two Medicare institutional claims for diabetes in patients with no history of diabetes prior to starting hemodialysis (HD). Incidence (per 1,000 patient-years), prevalence (%) and hazard ratios for mortality in patients with NODAD were calculated., Results: There were 59,340 incident patients with no history of diabetes prior to starting HD, of which 3,853 met criteria for NODAD. The overall incidence and prevalence of NODAD were 20 per 1,000 patient-years and 7.6%, respectively. In a cohort of 444 patients without diabetes and documented glycosylated hemoglobin A1c, <6% prior to starting HD (from January 2005 and March 2006), at a mean follow-up of 4.7 +/- 2.6 months, 6.8% developed NODAD defined by two Medicare claims for diabetes after initiation of HD. NODAD was associated with a significantly increased risk of death as compared to non-diabetes patients (hazard ratio 1.20, 95% confidence interval 1.14-1.25)., Conclusion: The USRDS showed a high incidence of NODAD, associated with significantly higher mortality compared to those who did not develop NODAD. The mechanism of NODAD needs to be explored further in experimental and clinical studies., (2010 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Previous studies have shown that gout is associated with an increased risk for cardiovascular mortality in the general population, but this has not been well studied in patients with ESRD. In this study, the incidence of gout and its association with mortality was evaluated in 259,209 patients in the United States Renal Data System. Overall, the incidence of gout in the first year of dialysis was 5% and in the first 5 yr was 15.4%. Independent risk factors for gout in adjusted analyses included black race, older age, female gender, hypertension, ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, and alcohol use. Factors associated with a lower risk for gout included a history of diabetes, smoking, and peripheral vascular disease. Time-dependent Cox regression analysis suggested that an episode of gout was independently associated with a 1.5-fold increase in mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio 1.49; 95% confidence interval 1.43 to 1.55). The mechanisms underlying this association require further study.

Background and Objectives: Evaluation for ischemic heart disease (IHD) is a nonstandardized practice before kidney transplantation. We retrospectively studied pretransplant cardiac evaluation (CE) practices in a national sample of renal allograft recipients., Design, Setting, Participants, & Measurements: The USRDS data for Medicare beneficiaries transplanted in 1991 to 2004 with Part A&B benefits from dialysis initiation through transplantation were examined. Clinical traits defining "high" expected IHD risk were defined as diabetes, prior IHD, or > or = 2 other coronary risk factors. Pretransplant CE were identified by billing claims for noninvasive stress tests and angiography. Patients were quantified with claims for coronary revascularization procedures between CE and transplant. Post-transplant acute myocardial infarction (AMI) events were abstracted from claims and death records., Results: Among 27,786 eligible patients, 46.3% underwent CE before transplantation. Overall, 9.5% who received CE also received pretransplant revascularization, but only 0.3% of lower-risk patients undergoing CE had revascularization. The adjusted odds of transplant without CE increased sharply with younger age and shorter dialysis duration. Increased likelihood of transplant without CE also correlated with black race, female sex, and certain geographic regions. Among patients transplanted without CE, 3-yr incidence of post-transplant AMI was 3% in lower-risk and 10% in high-risk groups, and varied by individual traits within these groups. Among lower-risk patients transplanted without CE, blacks were higher risk for AMI than whites (adjusted hazards ratio 1.47, 95% CI 1.11-1.93)., Conclusions: Observed practices demonstrate infrequent use of pretransplant revascularization after CE but also raise concern for socio-demographic barriers to evaluation access.

Background: End-stage renal disease is known to disrupt the cell-mediated immune response that is responsible for the killing of intracellular organisms such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Risk factors that contribute to the development of tuberculosis (TB) disease in the US dialysis population have not been studied on a large scale., Methods: A retrospective cohort study of TB disease in 272,024 patients in the US Renal Data System initiated on dialysis therapy between 1 April 1995 and 31 December 1999 with Medicare or Medicaid as primary payer were analysed. A total of 21 risk factors were analysed., Results: Among the US population studied, there is a 1.2 and 1.6% cumulative incidence of TB in patients undergoing either peritoneal or haemodialysis, respectively. Ten risk factors for TB that proved to be statistically significant included advanced age (P<0.001), unemployment (P<0.001), Medicaid insurance (P<0.001), reduced body mass index (P<0.001), decreased serum albumin (P<0.001), haemodialysis (P=0.019), both Asian (P=0.010) and Native American (P=0.020) race, ischaemic heart disease (P=0.032), smoking (P=0.010), illicit drug use (P=0.018) and anaemia (P=0.028). TB was independently associated with increased mortality, adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 1.42 (95% CI 1.18-1.70, P<0.001)., Conclusions: The prevalence of TB disease in the US dialysis population is low compared with worldwide rates; however, the disease is associated with increased mortality. Of the 10 significant risk factors identified, five are potentially modifiable.

The life expectancy of patients who have dementia and are initiated on dialysis in the United States has not been described in the medical literature. A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 272,024 Medicare/Medicaid primary patients in the US Renal Data System who were started on ESRD therapy between April 1, 1995, and December 31, 1999, and followed through December 31, 2001. Cox regression was used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios for risk for death after initiation of dialysis for patients whose dementia was diagnosed before the initiation of dialysis as shown by Medicare claims. The average time to death for patients with dementia was 1.09 versus 2.7 yr (P < 0.001) with an adjusted hazard ratio of 1.87 (95% confidence interval 1.77 to 1.98). The 2-yr survival for patients with dementia was 24 versus 66% for patients without dementia (P < 0.001 via log rank test). Dementia that is diagnosed before initiation on dialysis is an independent risk factor for subsequent death. Such patients should be considered for time-limited trials of dialysis and careful discussion in choosing whether to pursue initiation of dialysis or palliative care.

Background: The incidence, risk factors, recurrence rates and prognosis of thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) among long-term dialysis patients in the United States have not been previously described in a national population., Methods: 272 024 Medicare primary patients in the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) initiated on end-stage renal disease (ESRD) therapy between 1 April 1995 and 31 December 1999 with Medicare as primary payer were analysed in a retrospective cohort study of USRDS of TMA. Cox regression was used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (AHR) for risk of TMA and risk of death after TMA., Results: The incidence of TMA in the first year of dialysis was 0.5% overall. Among patients with renal failure due to haemolytic uraemic syndrome (HUS), the incidence of TMA was highest in the first year of dialysis (HUS, 11.3% first year, 4.5% per year thereafter), while among patients without HUS the incidence of TMA was much lower and more constant over time (0.3% per year). In Cox regression analysis, independent risk factors for TMA were renal failure due to HUS (adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) 179, 95% CI 95-338), paediatric age (

In the general population, a high body mass index (BMI; in kg/m(2)) is associated with increased cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality. However, the effect of overweight (BMI: 25-30) or obesity (BMI: >30) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) is paradoxically in the opposite direction; ie, a high BMI is associated with improved survival. Although this "reverse epidemiology" of obesity or dialysis-risk-paradox is relatively consistent in MHD patients, studies in CKD patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis have yielded mixed results. Growing confusion has developed among physicians, some of whom are no longer confident about whether to treat obesity in CKD patients. A similar reverse epidemiology of obesity has been described in geriatric populations and in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). Possible causes of the reverse epidemiology of obesity include a more stable hemodynamic status, alterations in circulating cytokines, unique neurohormonal constellations, endotoxin-lipoprotein interaction, reverse causation, survival bias, time discrepancies among competitive risk factors, and malnutrition-inflammation complex syndrome. Reverse epidemiology may have significant clinical implications in the management of dialysis, CHF, and geriatric patients, ie, populations with extraordinarily high mortality. Exploring the causes and consequences of the reverse epidemiology of obesity in dialysis patients can enhance our insights into similar paradoxes observed for other conventional risk factors, such as blood pressure and serum cholesterol and homocysteine concentrations, and in other populations such as those with CHF, advanced age, cancer, or AIDS. Weight-gaining interventional studies in dialysis patients are urgently needed to ascertain whether they can improve survival and quality of life.

Background: beta-Blockers have been shown to be beneficial in the treatment and prevention of heart failure (HF) in the general population, but they have not been assessed for their association with nonfatal HF in a nationally representative population of long-term dialysis patients., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2550 patients enrolled in the US Renal Data System (USRDS) Wave 2 who were Medicare eligible at the start of the study. Analysis was stratified by the presence or absence of a known diagnosis of HF, and patients followed up until December 31, 2000. Cox regression analysis, including propensity scores, was used to model adjusted hazard ratios for beta-blocker use (assessed separately by cardioselective activity and lipid solubility) with time to the first Medicare institutional claim for HF, cardiovascular-related death, or death from any cause., Results: In patients without a previous history of HF, beta-blocker use was significantly associated with a lower adjusted risk of HF (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.91; P=.008), with a similar reduction in risk of cardiac-related and all-cause death. beta-Blocker use had no statistically significant associations with outcomes in patients with previous HF., Conclusions: In dialysis patients without a previous documented history of HF, beta-blocker use was associated with a lower risk of new HF, cardiovascular death, and death from any cause. No such associations were seen for dialysis patients with a previous history of HF. These results are hypothesis generating only and should be confirmed in randomized trials.

Background: The impact of obesity on survival in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients as related to dialysis modality (i.e., a direct comparison of hemodialysis with peritoneal dialysis) has not been assessed adjusting for differences in medication use, follow-up > or =2 years, or accounting for changes in dialysis modality., Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Wave II Study (DMMS) patients who started dialysis in 1996, and were followed until October 31 2001. Cox regression analysis was used to model adjusted hazard ratios (AHR) for mortality for categories of body mass index (BMI), both as quartiles and as > or =30 kg/m2 vs. lower. Because such a large proportion of peritoneal dialysis patients changed to hemodialysis during the study period (45.5%), a sensitivity analysis was performed calculating survival time both censoring and not censoring on the date of change from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis., Results: There were 1675 hemodialysis and 1662 peritoneal dialysis patients. Among hemodialysis patients, 5-year survival for patients with BMI > or =30 kg/m2 was 39.8% vs. 32.3% for lower BMI (P < 0.01 by log-rank test). Among peritoneal dialysis patients, 5-year survival for patients with BMI >/=30 kg/m2 was 38.7% vs. 40.4% for lower BMI (P > 0.05 by log-rank test). In adjusted analysis, BMI > or = 30 kg/m2 was associated with improved survival in hemodialysis patients (AHR 0.89; 95% CI 0.81, 0.99; P= 0.042) but not peritoneal dialysis patients (AHR = 0.99; 95% CI, 0.86, 1.15; P= 0.89). Results were not different on censoring of change from peritoneal dialysis to hemodialysis., Conclusion: We conclude that any survival advantage associated with obesity among chronic dialysis patients is significantly less likely for peritoneal dialysis patients, compared to hemodialysis patients.

Background: There are some concerns that arteriovenous fistula (AVF) use or other dialysis specific factors may exacerbate cardiovascular disease in long-term hemodialysis (HD) patients., Methods: We performed a historical cohort study of the United States Renal Data System Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Wave II study, limited to 993 patients who started HD in 1996 with valid information on vascular access and who were primarily eligible for Medicare at the start of the study. We assessed the association between hemodialysis vascular access and heart disease, defined as Medicare Claims for heart failure (HF, International Classification of Diseases (ICD9) code 428.x) and acute coronary syndromes (ACS, ICD9 code 410.x and 411.x). Cox proportional hazards regression (using propensity analysis) was used to model adjusted hazard ratios (AHR) for the association between patients factors and heart disease after dialysis., Results: The rate of HF per 100 person years at risk (PYAR) was 19.6 among AVF users, 25.7 among patients using polytetrafluoroethylene grafts (grafts), and 31.1 among patients using temporary catheters. Corresponding rates of ACS were 8.2 among AVF users, 11.0 among users of grafts, and 12.4 among users of temporary catheters. In Cox Regression analysis, there was no significant association between AVF use and either HF or ACS. This lack of association was consistent across gender, diabetes, race, and age., Conclusions: We found that AVF use had no significant association with the incidence of HF or ACS. We conclude that use of AVF by 60 days after the start of dialysis is not associated with an increased risk of later non-fatal cardiovascular outcomes in long-term hemodialysis patients.

Background: Risk factors for heart failure (HF) have not been reported previously in a nationally representative sample of dialysis patients., Methods: We conducted a historic cohort study of 1,995 patients enrolled in the US Renal Data System Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study Wave 2 who were Medicare eligible at the study start and were followed up until December 31, 1999, or receipt of a renal transplant. Cox regression analysis was used to model associations with time to first hospitalization for both recurrent and de novo HF (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code 428.x), defined as patients with and without a history of HF, respectively., Results: The incidence density of HF was 71/1,000 person-years. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and beta-blockers were each used in less than 25% of patients with a known history of HF. A history of coronary heart disease was associated with an increased total risk for HF, as were hemodialysis (versus peritoneal dialysis), aspirin use, and a history of diabetes. However, hemodialysis and aspirin use were the only factors associated with both de novo and recurrent HF. Widened pulse pressure was associated with de novo HF. The mortality rate after HF was 83% at 3 years (adjusted hazard ratio for mortality, 2.10; 95% confidence interval, 1.80 to 2.45; P < 0.0001)., Conclusion: In chronic dialysis patients, hemodialysis and aspirin use were associated with increased risk for both total and de novo HF. Hospitalized HF was associated with a significantly increased risk for death.

Background: Whether morning shift hemodialysis is associated with improved survival in comparison to patients receiving afternoon shift hemodialysis has not been shown for a representative sample of US chronic hemodialysis patients., Methods: We conducted a historical cohort study of a national database (US Renal Data System Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Waves III/IV) of 6,939 patients who started hemodialysis therapy from January 1, 1990, through December 31, 1993. Patients were followed up through April 9, 2000, and censored at the time of change to a different modality, including transplantation. We estimated the adjusted hazard ratio for all-cause mortality based on the time of day of hemodialysis (0500 to 1200 for morning shift, 1200 to 1800 for afternoon shift, 1800 to midnight for evening shift). Cox regression analysis was used to adjust for other factors associated with survival., Results: For patients aged 60 years and older, the unadjusted 4-year survival rate for patients on morning shift hemodialysis was 28.8% versus 24.1% for patients on afternoon shift hemodialysis and 38.7% for patients on evening shift hemodialysis (P < 0.01 by log-rank test for both versus afternoon shift hemodialysis). Both morning shift (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83 to 0.98; P = 0.02) and evening shift hemodialysis (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.80; P < or = 0.001) were independently associated with a lower risk for mortality compared with afternoon shift hemodialysis. No such differences were seen for patients younger than 60 years. Both morning shift and evening shift hemodialysis were independently associated with improved survival compared with afternoon shift hemodialysis in elderly chronic hemodialysis patients. No such association was found for younger patients.

Background: The incidence and risk factors for hospitalized atrial fibrillation have not been previously assessed in a national population of dialysis patients., Methods: We analyzed the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study (DMMS) Wave II in a historical cohort study of hospitalized atrial fibrillation. Data from 3374 patients who started dialysis in 1996 with valid follow-up times were available for analysis, censored at the time of renal transplantation and followed until November 2000. Cox Regression analysis was used to model factors associated with time to first hospitalization for atrial fibrillation (ICD9 code 427.31x) adjusted for comorbidities, demographic factors, baseline laboratory values, blood pressures, dialysis modality, and cardioprotective medications., Results: The incidence density of atrial fibrillation was 12.5/1000 person years. Factors associated with atrial fibrillation were older age (> or = 71 years vs. <48 years), extremes (both high and low) of pre-dialysis systolic blood pressure, dialysis modality (hemodialysis vs. peritoneal dialysis), and digoxin use. Baseline use of coumadin was associated with reduced mortality in patients later hospitalized for atrial fibrillation., Conclusions: Dialysis patients had a high incidence of atrial fibrillation. This risk was largely segregated among those with established risk factors for atrial fibrillation, and hemodialysis patients. Use of coumadin was associated with improved survival among patients later hospitalized for atrial fibrillation.

Background: The national incidence of and factors associated with total hip arthroplasty (THA) in chronic dialysis patients has never been reported., Methods: We therefore performed an historical cohort study of 375,857 chronic dialysis patients listed in the 2000 United States Renal Data System between 1 April 1995 and 31 December 1999 and followed-up until 14 May 2000. Primary outcomes were associations with hospitalizations for a primary discharge code of THA (ICD9 procedure code 81.51x) after initiation of dialysis., Results: Dialysis patients had a cumulative incidence of THA of 35 episodes/10,000 person-years, compared to 5.3/10,000 in the general population. The leading indication for THA was osteoarthritis of the hip and pelvis (58% of cases). However, the strongest risk factor for THA in dialysis patients was end-stage renal disease (ESRD) due to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE, adjusted rate ratio (ARR), 6.80, 95% CI 4.62-10.03, in whom avascular necrosis of the hip was the most common indication, 68.4%). The database did not include information on use of corticosteroids. Diabetic recipients were significantly less likely to receive THA, as were males, and African Americans. Mortality after THA was 0.25% at thirty days and 30% at three years, not significantly different from the expected mortality of dialysis, adjusted for comorbidity., Conclusions: The most common indication for THA in dialysis patients is osteoarthritis of the hip, similar to the general population. Patients with SLE are more likely to receive THA which is well tolerated and not associated with increased mortality in this population, perhaps reflecting selection bias due to appropriate screening for this elective procedure.

Background: There is little information on how target lipid levels can be achieved in end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients in a systematic, multidisciplinary fashion., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a pharmacist-directed hyperlipidemia management program for chronic hemodialysis (HD) patients. All 26 adult patients on chronic HD at a tertiary care medical facility were entered into the program. A clinical pharmacist was responsible for laboratory monitoring, patient counseling, and the initiation and dosage adjustment of an appropriate 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor (statin) using a dosing algorithm and monitoring guidelines. The low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol goal was leq; 100 mg/dl. A renal dietitian provided nutrition counseling and the nephrologist was notified of potential or existing drug interactions or adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Patients received a flyer containing lipid panel results to encourage compliance. Data was collected at program initiation and for 6 months thereafter., Results: At the start of the program, 58% of patients were at target LDL cholesterol. At 6 months, 88% had achieved target LDL (p = 0.015). Mean LDL cholesterol decreased from 96 +/- 5 to 80 +/- 3 mg/dl (p < 0.01), and mean total cholesterol decreased from 170 +/- 7 to 151 +/- 4 mg/dl (p < 0.01). Fifteen adjustments in drug therapy were made. Eight adverse drug reactions were identified; 2 required drug discontinuation or an alternative agent. Physicians were alerted to 8 potential drug-drug interactions, and appropriate monitoring was performed., Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate both feasibility and efficacy of a multidisciplinary approach in management of hyperlipidemia in HD patients.

Background: Patients on dialysis have a disproportionately high rate of cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the incidence and risk factors for incident acute coronary syndromes (ACS) have not been previously assessed in dialysis patients., Methods: We analyzed the United States Renal Data System (USRDS) Dialysis Morbidity and Mortality Study (DMMS) Wave II in a historical cohort study of ACS. Data from 3374 patients who started dialysis in 1996 with valid follow-up times were available for analysis, censored at the time of renal transplantation and followed until March 2000. Cox regression analysis was used to model factors associated with time to first hospitalization for ACS (ICD9 code 410.x or 411.x) adjusted for comorbidities, demographic factors, baseline laboratory values, blood pressures and cholesterol levels, type of vascular access, dialysis adequacy, and cardioprotective medications (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, calcium channel blockers, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), beta blockers, and aspirin). Follow-up was 2.19 +/- 1.14 years., Results: The incidence of ACS was 29/1000 person-years. Factors associated with ACS were older age, the extreme high and low ranges of serum cholesterol level, history of coronary heart disease (CHD), male gender, and diabetes. No cardioprotective medications including statins had a significant association with ACS in this study. However, medications known to reduce mortality after ACS were used in less than 50% of patients with known CHD at the start of the study, and statins were used in less than 10% of patients with CHD., Conclusions: Dialysis patients had similar risk factors for ACS compared to the general population. Cardioprotective medications were not associated with a significant benefit, possibly due to their striking underutilization in this at-risk population.

Aims: Bacterial endocarditis is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality but has not been studied in a national population of end-stage renal disease patients., Methods: 327,993 dialysis patients in the United States Renal Data System initiated from 1 January 1992 to 30 June 1997 were analyzed in a historical cohort study of hospitalized bacterial endocarditis (ENDO, ICD9 Code 421.x). Renal transplant recipients were excluded., Results: Hemodialysis patients had an age-adjusted incidence ratio for ENDO of 17.86 (95% confidence interval, 6.62-48.90) and peritoneal dialysis patients 10.54 (95% CI, 0.71- 158.13, not statistically significant) compared to the general population in 1996 (the National Hospital Discharge Survey). 6.1% of patients with ENDO underwent valve replacement surgery. In multivariate analysis, hemodialysis (vs. peritoneal dialysis), earlier year of dialysis, cardiac disease, and lower serum creatinine and albumin were associated with increased risk of ENDO. In Cox regression analysis, patients with ENDO had increased mortality, relative risk 1.48 (95% CI 1.45-1.73)., Conclusions: Patients on chronic dialysis were at increased risk for ENDO compared to the general population. The risk for peritoneal dialysis patients was not statistically significant, possibly due to the smaller numbers of patients on this modality. Hemodialysis (vs. peritoneal dialysis) and comorbidities were the strongest risk factors for ENDO identified., (Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel)

The incidence and risk factors for hospitalizations for bacterial septicemia, a serious cause of morbidity and mortality in end stage renal disease (ESRD), have been studied separately for patients on chronic dialysis and after renal transplantation, but have not been compared directly. Using data from the USRDS, we studied 11,369 patients with ESRD due to diabetes enrolled on the renal and renal-pancreas transplant waiting list from 1 July 1994-30 June 1997. Cox non-proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate adjusted, time-dependent hazard ratios (HR) for time to hospitalization for bacterial septicemia (ICD9 Code 038.x). In Cox Regression analysis, renal transplantation was independently associated with a shorter time to bacterial septicemia (HR 1.22, 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.40). In addition, renal transplantation was associated with a higher rate of sepsis due to gram-negative organisms (HR 3.32, 95% CI 2.614.23) and urinary tract infection (10.43, 95% CI 6.72-16.17) compared with patients still on the renal transplant waiting list. The relative risk of sepsis increased with time after renal transplantation. Renal transplantation was associated with a significantly higher risk and different spectrum of bacterial septicemia than maintenance dialysis, and the risk of sepsis did not decrease over time.

Background: Risk factors for pulmonary embolism (PE) in end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients have not been studied in a large population., Methods: 375,152 patients in the United States Renal Data System initiated on dialysis between 1 January 1992 and 30 June 1997 were analyzed in an historical cohort study of hospitalized PE (ICD9 Code 415.1x) occurring prior to receipt of renal transplant. Cox regression models were used to analyze risk factors for PE in dialysis. Dialysis modality was analyzed in an intention to treat fashion, thus patients who changed modalities later were considered to have remained on the same modality., Results: The incidence of pulmonary embolism did not increase over time. Independent risk factors for hospitalizations for PE were similar to those in the general population (older age, females, systemic lupus erythematosus, lower risk for Asians) with the addition of peritoneal dialysis (vs. hemodialysis, adjusted odds ratio 1.56, 95% CI 1.15-2.13), polycystic kidney disease, and congestive heart failure. Notably, in Cox regression analysis, no relation was seen with baseline laboratory results (hematocrit, serum albumin, serum creatinine) or comorbidity (except congestive heart failure) and PE risk. Dialysis patients with PE had increased mortality (hazard ratio 1.20, 95% confidence interval 1.08-1.33)., Conclusions: The incidence of PE did not increase significantly in ESRD patients from 1992-1997. PE were associated with increased mortality. Peritoneal dialysis patients may have higher risk of PE than hemodialysis patients, and other high-risk groups were identified.

Pulmonary embolism has been considered uncommon in chronic dialysis patients, but has not been adequately studied in a large population. In the US Renal Data System (USRDS), 76,718 patients presenting with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) between January 1, 1996, and December 31, 1996, were analyzed in an historical cohort study. The outcome was hospitalizations with a primary discharge diagnosis of pulmonary embolism (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision code 415.1x) occurring within 1 year of the first ESRD treatment and excluding those occurring after renal transplantation. For dialysis patients, hospitalization rates for pulmonary embolism were obtained from the hospitalization section of the 1999 USRDS. For the general population, hospitalization rates for pulmonary embolism were obtained from the National Hospital Discharge Survey for 1996. Comorbidities from the Medical Evidence Form (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, previously known as the Health Care Financing Administration; form 2728) were used to generate approximated stratified models of adjusted incidence ratios for pulmonary embolism (comorbidities could not be stratified for the general population). In 1996, the overall incidence rate of pulmonary embolism was 149.90/100,000 dialysis patients compared with 24.62/100,000 persons in the US population, with an age-adjusted incidence ratio of 2.34 in dialysis patients. Younger dialysis patients had the greatest relative risk for pulmonary embolism. The age-adjusted incidence ratio of pulmonary embolism after excluding dialysis patients with known risk factors for pulmonary embolism was 2.11. Ninety-five percent confidence intervals for all age categories in both models were statistically significant. Chronic dialysis patients have high risk for pulmonary embolism, independent of comorbidity.

Evidence-informed decision making in clinical care and policy in nephrology is undermined by trials that selectively report a large number of heterogeneous outcomes, many of which are not patient centered. The Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology-Hemodialysis (SONG-HD) Initiative convened an international consensus workshop on November 7, 2015, to discuss the identification and implementation of a potential core outcome set for all trials in hemodialysis. The purpose of this article is to report qualitative analyses of the workshop discussions, describing the key aspects to consider when establishing core outcomes in trials involving patients on hemodialysis therapy. Key stakeholders including 8 patients/caregivers and 47 health professionals (nephrologists, policymakers, industry, and researchers) attended the workshop. Attendees suggested that identifying core outcomes required equitable stakeholder engagement to ensure relevance across patient populations, flexibility to consider evolving priorities over time, deconstruction of language and meaning for conceptual consistency and clarity, understanding of potential overlap and associations between outcomes, and an assessment of applicability to the range of interventions in hemodialysis. For implementation, they proposed that core outcomes must have simple, inexpensive, and validated outcome measures that could be used in clinical care (quality indicators) and trials (including pragmatic trials) and endorsement by regulatory agencies. Integrating these recommendations may foster acceptance and optimize the uptake and translation of core outcomes in hemodialysis, leading to more informative research, for better treatment and improved patient outcomes.

Background β-Blockers have been shown to be beneficial in the treatment and prevention of heart failure (HF) in the general population, but they have not been assessed for their association with nonfatal HF in a nationally representative population of long-term dialysis patients. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2550 patients enrolled in the US Renal Data System (USRDS) Wave 2 who were Medicare eligible at the start of the study. Analysis was stratified by the presence or absence of a known diagnosis of HF, and patients followed up until December 31, 2000. Cox regression analysis, including propensity scores, was used to model adjusted hazard ratios for β-blocker use (assessed separately by cardioselective activity and lipid solubility) with time to the first Medicare institutional claim for HF, cardiovascular-related death, or death from any cause. Results In patients without a previous history of HF, β-blocker use was significantly associated with a lower adjusted risk of HF (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.52-0.91; P=.008), with a similar reduction in risk of cardiac-related and all-cause death. β-Blocker use had no statistically significant associations with outcomes in patients with previous HF. Conclusions In dialysis patients without a previous documented history of HF, β-blocker use was associated with a lower risk of new HF, cardiovascular death, and death from any cause. No such associations were seen for dialysis patients with a previous history of HF. These results are hypothesis generating only and should be confirmed in randomized trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]