Search

Background: Placement of renal-artery stents has a high technical success rate in atherosclerotic renovascular disease, but little is known about the clinical benefits of the procedure. We monitored renal function serially before and after stent insertion in patients with renovascular renal failure., Methods: Renal function was assessed before and after stent placement by means of serial serum creatinine values in 32 patients with atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis. The effect on the progression of renal failure was analysed in 23 patients by comparison of the reciprocal slopes of serum creatinine versus time plots before and after stent placement., Findings: 33 transluminal stents were placed in 32 patients with atherosclerotic renovascular disease. Immediate patency was achieved in all cases: the angiographic restenosis rate at 6 months was 12% (n = 24). One patient died after a procedure-related haemorrhage. Median diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower after stenting than before (95 [IQR 86-103] vs 87 [81-90] mm Hg; p > 0.01) but the requirement for antihypertensive drugs was unchanged. Renal function improved or stabilised in 22 (69%) of the 32 patients. Progression of renal failure was significantly slowed after the procedure; the mean (SE) of the slopes of reciprocal serum creatinine values was -4.34 (0.85) L mumol-1 day-1 before stent placement, and -0.55 (1.0) L mumol-1 day-1 after stent placement (p < 0.01, two-sample t test)., Interpretation: Renal-stent placement in selected patients slows the progression of renovascular renal failure and may delay the need for renal replacement therapy.

A prospective study comparing colour Doppler ultrasound (US) with the 'gold standard' of intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of renal transplant artery stenosis was performed. Both the intrarenal vessels and the transplant renal artery were examined by Doppler US. Diagnostic arteriography was performed only if, on Doppler, the peak systolic velocity in the transplant renal artery exceeded 1.5 ms-1. Of 109 patients, the transplant artery could not be visualized using colour Doppler US in three, and these were omitted from statistical analysis. Of the remaining 106 patients, 31 had a peak systolic velocity greater than 1.5 ms-1 in the transplant renal artery and were referred for DSA. Of the multiple renal Doppler indices recorded, the peak systolic velocity in the transplant artery was the best discriminating measurement for the detection of renal artery stenosis. A peak systolic velocity of > or = 2.5 ms-1 in the transplant renal artery had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 95% for the detection of renal artery stenosis ( > 50% diameter reduction). Although a significant difference in Pulsatility Index, Resistive Index, Acceleration Index and Acceleration Time was recorded from the intrarenal vessels in the angiographically normal and stenosed groups with Doppler, these measurements were less useful as discriminating diagnostic tests. In conclusion, the peak systolic velocity in the transplant renal artery is the most sensitive Doppler criterion for renal artery stenosis and is sensitive and specific enough to be used as a screening test. The intrarenal acceleration time and index should not be used in isolation.