Search

Understanding and predicting Arctic change and its impacts on global climate requires broad, sustained observations of the atmosphere-ice-ocean system, yet technological and logistical challenges severely restrict the temporal and spatial scope of observing efforts. Satellite remote sensing provides unprecedented, pan-Arctic measurements of the surface, but complementary in situ observations are required to complete the picture. Over the past few decades, a diverse range of autonomous platforms have been developed to make broad, sustained observations of the ice-free ocean, often with near-real-time data delivery. Though these technologies are well suited to the difficult environmental conditions and remote logistics that complicate Arctic observing, they face a suite of additional challenges, such as limited access to satellite services that make geolocation and communication possible. This paper reviews new platform and sensor developments, adaptations of mature technologies, and approaches for their use, placed within the framework of Arctic Ocean observing needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The airborne Operation IceBridge and spaceborne CryoSat-2 missions observe polar sea ice at different spatial and temporal scales as well as with different sensor suites. Comparison of data products from IceBridge and CryoSat-2 is complicated by the fact that they use different geophysical corrections: reference ellipsoid, geoid model, tide model, and atmospheric corrections to derive surface elevation and sea-ice freeboard. In this paper, we compare sea-ice surface elevation and freeboard using eight coincident CryoSat-2, Airborne Topographic Mapper (ATM), and Land, Vegetation, and Ice Sensor (LVIS) observations with direct IceBridge underflights of CryoSat-2 ground tracks. We apply identical geophysical corrections to CryoSat-2 and IceBridge data to eliminate elevation biases due to these differences and focus on differences due to retracker performance. The IceBridge ATM and LVIS elevation and freeboard and Snow Radar snow depth data sets are averaged to each CryoSat-2 footprint for comparison. With snow depth measurements, we are able to compare elevations and freeboards at the snow/ice interface for five different CryoSat-2 retrackers (ESA, GSFCv1, AWI, JPL, and GSFCv2) and IceBridge. The overall mean of freeboard differences between GSFCv2, ESA, AWI, JPL retrackers, and ATM are in agreement within 0.05 m. However, the five different CryoSat-2 retrackers show distinct differences in mean elevation over leads and over floes. This suggests that the physical interpretation of the different retrackers needs to be considered depending on usage, for example, elevations from CryoSat-2 retrackers need to be carefully calibrated before comparing with elevation from other satellites for long-term surface elevation trends. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Satellite radar altimeter (RA) measurements are important for continued monitoring of rapidly changing polar regions. In 2010, the European Space Agency launched CryoSat-2 carrying SIRAL, a Ku-band RA with objectives of determining the thickness and extent of sea ice and the topography of the ice sheets. One difficulty with Ku-band radar surveys over snow and ice is unknown penetration of RA signal into snow cover. Improving our understanding of the interactions of RA signals with snow and ice is needed to produce accurate elevation products. To this end, we developed a low-power, ultra wideband (12-18 GHz) RA for airborne surveys to provide fine resolution measurements capable of detecting both scattering from the surface and layers within sea ice and ice sheets. These measurements provide a means of identifying the dominant scattering location of lower resolution RA measurements comparable to satellite-based instruments. We generated two products: a full-bandwidth waveform (FBW) to identify scattering targets at fine resolution and a reduced bandwidth waveform (RBW) to represent conventional RA measurements. Retrackers are used to generate height estimates over various surface conditions for comparisons. Over ice sheets, the leading-edge tracker provided consistent ice-surface elevation measurements between the FBW and RBW results; however, there were significant differences between the results from the centroid tracker. Over sea ice, the location of the dominant return between the results from snow-covered sea ice is highly variable. This paper provides an overview of RA surveys in polar regions, a description of the CReSIS system, and a discussion of the results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Since 2009, subsets of declassified satellite images of Arctic sea ice have been released as literal image derived products (LIDPs) with one-meter resolution for scientific use. The collections include imagery acquired over six fixed locations in the Arctic Basin since 1999. Targeted acquisitions over drifting ice parcels, from 2009 on, provide an added dimension to the LIDP archive. This mode of acquisition is especially useful for capturing time-varying processes during the melt season. In this paper, we describe the characteristics of LIDPs, the extent of the current archive, and highlight their uses for Arctic sea ice science. At this writing, the archive of LIDPs is still quite limited, and thus this paper illustrates the potential utility of the imagery. We provide an overview of the retrieval of five sea ice parameters that would benefit significantly from the surface details afforded by the higher resolution LIDPs. They include: melt pond coverage, open water fraction, ridge height, floe size, and, openings and closings. Two other uses are suggested: measurement of lateral melt and the interpretation of radar backscatter. The intent is to motivate geophysical uses of the LIDP and future acquisitions. Results here suggest that the effective observations of sea ice parameters and especially their changes require more focused sampling strategies to address specific spatial and temporal sampling needs. Presently, acquisitions of this type of imagery at fixed locations and drifting sites are being continued, and LIDPs are added to the archive as they are released. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]