Search

The Patient Centered Assessment Method (PCAM) is an action-based tool that supports professionals to engage in a biopsychosocial assessment with patients and measure their needs. It is a promising tool for person-centered care. As the Netherlands lacks such a tool, a Dutch version was developed. Furthermore, we aimed to contribute to the relatively limited insights into the psychometric properties and value of the tool when used as part of a needs assessment in primary care. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to study construct validity and Cronbach’s alpha was computed to assess reliability. Furthermore, we interviewed 15 primary care professionals who used the PCAM. It was confirmed that each PCAM domain measures a separate construct, informed by the biopsychosocial model. The tool showed adequate reliability (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.83). Despite face validity concerns, the tool was mainly valued for measurement of patient needs and to facilitate action planning. Criticism of the PCAM pertained to a limited focus on the patient perspective, which is one of the crucial aspects of person-centered care. These rich, mixed-method insights can help to improve the value of the PCAM, as one of the few multifunctional tools to support professionals in holistic assessments.

Objective: We investigated whether the INTERMED, a generic instrument for assessing biopsychosocial case complexity and direct care, identifies organ transplant patients at risk of unfavourable post-transplant development by comparing it to the Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale (TERS), the established measure for pretransplant psychosocial evaluation.Method: One hundred nineteen kidney, liver, and heart transplant candidates were evaluated using the INTERMED, TERS, SF-36, EuroQol, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and Hospital Anxiety 8( Depression Scale (HADS).Results: We found significant relationships between the INTERMED and the TERS scores. The INTERMED highly correlated with the HADS, MADRS, and mental and physical health scores of the SF-36 Health Survey.Conclusions: The results demonstrate the validity and usefulness of the INTERMED instrument for pretransplant evaluation. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate the different qualities of INTERMED and TERS in clinical practice. The advantages of the psychiatric focus of the TERS and the biopsychosocial perspective of the INTERMED are discussed in the context of current literature on integrated care.

Objective: We investigated whether the INTERMED, a generic instrument for assessing biopsychosocial case complexity and direct care, identifies organ transplant patients at risk of unfavourable post-transplant development by comparing it to the Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale (TERS), the established measure for pretransplant psychosocial evaluation. Method: One hundred nineteen kidney, liver, and heart transplant candidates were evaluated using the INTERMED, TERS, SF-36, EuroQol, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and Hospital Anxiety 8( Depression Scale (HADS). Results: We found significant relationships between the INTERMED and the TERS scores. The INTERMED highly correlated with the HADS, MADRS, and mental and physical health scores of the SF-36 Health Survey. Conclusions: The results demonstrate the validity and usefulness of the INTERMED instrument for pretransplant evaluation. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate the different qualities of INTERMED and TERS in clinical practice. The advantages of the psychiatric focus of the TERS and the biopsychosocial perspective of the INTERMED are discussed in the context of current literature on integrated care.

Objectives: The INFERMED for the Elderly Self Assessment (IM-E-SA) was developed to support health care professionals in providing demand driven elderly care. It assesses case complexity and health care needs as perceived by older adults themselves. By applying this instrument tailored care can be provided as it supports professionals in their allocation decisions. The aim was to evaluate the measurement properties of the IM-E-SA.Methods: In this cross-sectional study 338 elderly people completed a postal questionnaire and participated in an interview. Feasibility of the IM-E-SA was assessed by determining the percentages of missing values per item. Reliability of the IM-E-SA was expressed as Cronbach's alpha. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated between the IM-E-SA and IM-E. Nonparametric tests were applied to assess if the IM-E-SA could distinguish between subgroups of elderly adults who differed on demographic characteristics and the prevalence of diseases/disorders. Convergent validity and discriminant validity were assessed using Spearman rank correlations between the IM-E-SA and IM-E, life satisfaction (Cantril's Ladder of Life), activities of daily living (Katz extended), quality of life (EQ-5D), mental health (SF-36) and prevalence of diseases/disorders.Results: Percentages of missing values per IM-E-SA item ranged from 0 to 5%. Cronbach's alpha was.78. The ICC between the total scores of the IM-E-SA and the IM-E was.68. The IM-E-SA yielded statistically significant differences between subgroups (known-group validity). Correlations evaluating the convergent validity were moderate to strong (.50-.70). Those correlations assessing the discriminant validity were moderate (.38-.53).Conclusion: This study supports the feasibility, reliability and validity of the IM-E-SA. (C) 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Background: Depression is highly prevalent in patients with physical illness and is associated with a diminished quality of life and poorer medical outcomes. Objective: The authors evaluated whether a multifaceted intervention conducted by a psychiatric consultation-liaison nurse could reduce the incidence of major depression in rheumatology inpatients and diabetes outpatients with a high level of case complexity. Method: Of 247 randomized patients, the authors identified 100 patients with a high level of case complexity at baseline and without major depression (65 rheumatology and 35 diabetes patients). Patients were randomized to usual care (N = 53) or to a nurse-led intervention (N = 47). Main outcomes were the incidence of major depression and severity of depressive symptoms during a 1-year follow-up, based on quarterly assessments with standardized psychiatric interviews. Results: The incidence of major depression was 63% in usual-care patients and 36% in the intervention group. Effects of intervention on depressive symptoms were observed in outpatients with diabetes but not in rheumatology inpatients. Conclusion: These preliminary results based on subgroup analysis suggest that a multifaceted nurse-led intervention may prevent the occurrence of major depression in complex medically ill patients and reduce depressive symptoms in diabetes outpatients. (Psychosomatics 2009; 50: 227-233)

Background: Depression is highly prevalent in patients with physical illness and is associated with a diminished quality of life and poorer medical outcomes. Objective: The authors evaluated whether a multifaceted intervention conducted by a psychiatric consultation-liaison nurse could reduce the incidence of major depression in rheumatology inpatients and diabetes outpatients with a high level of case complexity. Method: Of 247 randomized patients, the authors identified 100 patients with a high level of case complexity at baseline and without major depression (65 rheumatology and 35 diabetes patients). Patients were randomized to usual care (N = 53) or to a nurse-led intervention (N = 47). Main outcomes were the incidence of major depression and severity of depressive symptoms during a 1-year follow-up, based on quarterly assessments with standardized psychiatric interviews. Results: The incidence of major depression was 63% in usual-care patients and 36% in the intervention group. Effects of intervention on depressive symptoms were observed in outpatients with diabetes but not in rheumatology inpatients. Conclusion: These preliminary results based on subgroup analysis suggest that a multifaceted nurse-led intervention may prevent the occurrence of major depression in complex medically ill patients and reduce depressive symptoms in diabetes outpatients. (Psychosomatics 2009; 50: 227-233)

IntroductionThe INTERMED has been developed in the past years asa method to assess case complexity and resulting care needsin order to foster coordinated and integrated health care [1–4]. The INTERMED is an observer-rated instrument thatclassifies information from a structured medical historytaking. We demonstrated its interrater reliability [1,5],validity [2], and clinical utility in detecting complex patientswith a diminished treatment response [3,4,6,7]. In this study,we studied its internal consistency in order to evaluate ifcase complexity as a one-dimensional construct is measuredreliably with the INTERMED.MethodsSampleData were derived from previously published studiesand studies in process, consisting of patients admitted tointernal medicine (n=302 andn=89) [4,10], patientsreferred to a CL-psychiatry service (n=100) [8], outpatientswith diabetes (n=61) [6], rheumatoid arthritis (n=75) [7],low back pain (n=102) [3], multiple sclerosis (n=152),under dialysis (n=80), and neurological outpatients(n=71). INTERMED scores of these 1032 patients weremerged and analyzed together.INTERMEDThe four domains of the INTERMED—biological, psy-chological, social, and health care—are assessed in thecontext of time (history, current state, and prognosis)resulting in 20 variables (see Fig. 1) that are scored 0–3based on a structured interview [9].Data analysisCronbach’s a as an indicator for internal consistency wascalculated for the total sample and for the individualsamples in order to evaluate the generalizability of thefindings. To further study the structure of the INTERMED,we calculated Pearson correlation coefficients amongdomain scores.ResultsAs illustrated in Table 1, the mean INTERMED scores ofthe different samples vary between 15.5 and 29.6 with lowback pain patients showing the highest biopsychosocialcomplexity. All a’s are above .75 indicating satisfactoryinternal consistency in each of the samples, with the highesta in the low back pain population. The a of the total sampleis .87 and between .86 and .89 with a 95% level ofconfidence interval.Correlations among the domain scores are significantlypositive correlated in all samples, except for three. In theCL-psychiatry sample, the biological domain score was notsignificantly correlated to the scores on the psychologicaland social domain. Also, in the diabetes sample, thebiological domain score was not significantly correlated tothe psychological domain. In the total sample, the lowest

Objectives: To enable prevention of poor outcome in elderly people, a valid instrument is required to detect individuals at high risk. The concept of frailty is a better predictor than age alone. The Groningen Frailty Indicator (GFI) has been developed to identify frailty. We assessed feasibility, reliability, and construct validity of the self-assessment version of the GFI.Design: Cross-sectional.Setting: Community-based.Participants: Home-dwelling and institutionalized elderly persons were included in the study (n = 353) who met the following inclusion criteria: persons 65 years and older who were able to fill out questionnaires.Measurements: The feasibility of the GFI was assessed by determining the proportion of missing values per item. The internal consistency reliability of the GFI was established by calculating the KR-20. Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests were applied to assess discrimination between specific subgroups (known group validity). Convergent and discriminant validity was assessed using Spearman Rank correlations between GFI and diseases and disorders, case complexity, and health care needs (INTERMED), life satisfaction (Cantril Ladder of Life), activities of daily living (Katz), quality of life (EQ-5D), and mental health (SF-36). Finally, we used multivariate regression analyses to evaluate the cutoff score of the GFI (= 4).Results: A total of 296 (84%) of the participants completed all items of the GFI; the internal consistency was 0.68. The GFI yielded statistically significant GFI scores for subgroups (known group validity). The correlations for the convergent (range 0.45 to 0.61) and discriminant validity (range 0.08 to 0.50) were also as hypothesized. In contrast with nonfrail participants, frail older persons had higher levels of case complexity, disability, and lower quality of life and life satisfaction.Conclusions: This study supports the feasibility, reliability, and validity of the self-assessment version of the GFI in home-dwelling and institutionalized elderly people. Copyright (C) 2012 - American Medical Directors Association, Inc.

Background: Depression is highly prevalent in patients with physical illness and is associated with a diminished quality of life and poorer medical outcomes. Objective: The authors evaluated whether a multifaceted intervention conducted by a psychiatric consultation-liaison nurse could reduce the incidence of major depression in rheumatology inpatients and diabetes outpatients with a high level of case complexity. Method: Of 247 randomized patients, the authors identified 100 patients with a high level of case complexity at baseline and without major depression (65 rheumatology and 35 diabetes patients). Patients were randomized to usual care (N = 53) or to a nurse-led intervention (N = 47). Main outcomes were the incidence of major depression and severity of depressive symptoms during a 1-year follow-up, based on quarterly assessments with standardized psychiatric interviews. Results: The incidence of major depression was 63% in usual-care patients and 36% in the intervention group. Effects of intervention on depressive symptoms were observed in outpatients with diabetes but not in rheumatology inpatients. Conclusion: These preliminary results based on subgroup analysis suggest that a multifaceted nurse-led intervention may prevent the occurrence of major depression in complex medically ill patients and reduce depressive symptoms in diabetes outpatients. (Psychosomatics 2009; 50: 227-233)

Objective: The authors investigated the effects of implementing psychiatric interventions on a general medical ward by means of a stepped detection and treatment strategy conducted by a consultation-liaison (CL) nurse in terms of reducing length of hospital stay (LOS) and improving quality of life (QOL) at discharge. Materials and Methods: One hundred ninety-three patients participated in a controlled trial, in which patients were screened with COMPRI and INTERMED. A nurse under supervision of a CL psychiatrist conducted interventions, consisting of simple psychiatric interventions by herself, referral to auxiliary services, or initiation of postdischarge care. Intervention patients were compared with historic controls on LOS and QOL (SF36) at discharge. Results: In multivariate analysis of variance, a significant effect of the intervention on QOL (p = 0.037) was found, which diminished after controlling for confounders (p = 0.28). No significant effect on LOS was found for the whole sample (P = 0.72), but in patients age 65 years or older, a reduction in LOS (p = 0.05) was found. This effect remained after controlling for confounders (p = 0.06). Conclusions: These data suggest that screening for risk of increased health care might improve outcomes in general medical inpatients. Because of the design of the study, however, these findings should be considered preliminary and confirmed in a larger, multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

During the last 10 years the INTERMED method has been developed as a generic method for the assessment of bio-psychosocial health risks and health needs and for planning of integrated treatment. The INTERMED has been conceptualized to counteract divisions and fragmentation of medical care. Designed to enhance the communication between patients and the health providers as well as between different professions and disciplines, the INTERMED is a visualized, action-oriented decision-support tool. This article presents various aspects of the INTERMED, such as its relevance, description, scoring, the related patient interview and treatment planning, scientific evaluation, implementation, and support for the method.

Objective: We investigated whether the INTERMED, a generic instrument for assessing biopsychosocial case complexity and direct care, identifies organ transplant patients at risk of unfavourable post-transplant development by comparing it to the Transplant Evaluation Rating Scale (TERS), the established measure for pretransplant psychosocial evaluation. Method: One hundred nineteen kidney, liver, and heart transplant candidates were evaluated using the INTERMED, TERS, SF-36, EuroQol, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and Hospital Anxiety 8( Depression Scale (HADS). Results: We found significant relationships between the INTERMED and the TERS scores. The INTERMED highly correlated with the HADS, MADRS, and mental and physical health scores of the SF-36 Health Survey. Conclusions: The results demonstrate the validity and usefulness of the INTERMED instrument for pretransplant evaluation. Furthermore, our findings demonstrate the different qualities of INTERMED and TERS in clinical practice. The advantages of the psychiatric focus of the TERS and the biopsychosocial perspective of the INTERMED are discussed in the context of current literature on integrated care.