Search

Iterative trajectory optimization techniques for non-linear dynamical systems are among the most powerful and sample-efficient methods of model-based reinforcement learning and approximate optimal control. By leveraging time-variant local linear-quadratic approximations of system dynamics and reward, such methods can find both a target-optimal trajectory and time-variant optimal feedback controllers. However, the local linear-quadratic assumptions are a major source of optimization bias that leads to catastrophic greedy updates, raising the issue of proper regularization. Moreover, the approximate models' disregard for any physical state-action limits of the system causes further aggravation of the problem, as the optimization moves towards unreachable areas of the state-action space. In this paper, we address the issue of constrained systems in the scenario of online-fitted stochastic linear dynamics. We propose modeling state and action physical limits as probabilistic chance constraints linear in both state and action and introduce a new trajectory optimization technique that integrates these probabilistic constraints by optimizing a relaxed quadratic program. Our empirical evaluations show a significant improvement in learning robustness, which enables our approach to perform more effective updates and avoid premature convergence observed in state-of-the-art algorithms.

Reinforcement learning of motor skills is an important challenge in order to endow robots with the ability to learn a wide range of skills and solve complex tasks. However, comparing reinforcement learning against human programming is not straightforward. In this paper, we create a motor learning framework consisting of state-of-the-art components in motor skill learning and compare it to a manually designed program on the task of robot tetherball. We use dynamical motor primitives for representing the robot's trajectories and relative entropy policy search to train the motor framework and improve its behavior by trial and error. These algorithmic components allow for high-quality skill learning while the experimental setup enables an accurate evaluation of our framework as robot players can compete against each other. In the complex game of robot tetherball, we show that our learning approach outperforms and wins a match against a high quality hand-crafted system.

Funding Information: This project has received funding from the DFG project PA3179/1-1 (ROBOLEAP) and from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 640554 (SKILLS4ROBOTS). Calculations for this research were conducted on the Lichtenberg high performance computer of the TU Darmstadt. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Pascal Klink, Hany Abdulsamad, Boris Belousov, Carlo D'Eramo, Jan Peters, Joni Pajarinen. Across machine learning, the use of curricula has shown strong empirical potential to improve learning from data by avoiding local optima of training objectives. For reinforcement learning (RL), curricula are especially interesting, as the underlying optimization has a strong tendency to get stuck in local optima due to the exploration-exploitation trade-off. Recently, a number of approaches for an automatic generation of curricula for RL have been shown to increase performance while requiring less expert knowledge compared to manually designed curricula. However, these approaches are seldomly investigated from a theoretical perspective, preventing a deeper understanding of their mechanics. In this paper, we present an approach for automated curriculum generation in RL with a clear theoretical underpinning. More precisely, we formalize the well-known self-paced learning paradigm as inducing a distribution over training tasks, which trades off between task complexity and the objective to match a desired task distribution. Experiments show that training on this induced distribution helps to avoid poor local optima across RL algorithms in different tasks with uninformative rewards and challenging exploration requirements.