Search

Physical activity outcomes are poor following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose was to evaluate feasibility of a physical activity feedback intervention for patients after TKA. Participants completing conventional TKA rehabilitation were randomized to a physical activity feedback (PAF; n = 22) or control (CTL; n = 23) group. The PAF intervention included real-time activity feedback, weekly action planning, and monthly group support meetings (12 weeks). The CTL group received attention control education. Feasibility was assessed using retention, adherence, dose goal attainment, and responsiveness with pre- and postintervention testing. The PAF group had 100% retention, 92% adherence (frequency of feedback use), and 65% dose goal attainment (frequency of meeting goals). The PAF group average daily step count increased from 5,754 (2,714) (pre) to 6,917 (3,445) steps/day (post). This study describes a feasible intervention to use as an adjunct to conventional rehabilitation for people with TKA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To investigate the effectiveness of home health physical therapy followed by outpatient physical therapy as compared to patients discharged directly to outpatient physical therapy in improving functional performance, strength/activation and residual knee pain outcomes among patients who received a total knee arthroplasty. Materials and methods: A secondary analysis of longitudinal data in which patients with total knee arthroplasty underwent home health physical therapy or were discharged directly to outpatient physical therapy. Main outcome measures included the stair climb test, timed up and go, 6-min walk test, quadriceps and hamstring strength, quadriceps activation and residual knee pain. Results: Patients referred to home health physical therapy prior to outpatient physical therapy demonstrated significantly greater declines in stair climb test (10.3; 95% CI [6.5, 14.1]; t = 5.41; p < 0.0001), timed up and go (2.0; 95% CI [1.0, 3.0]; t = 4.10; p < 0.0001), 6-min walk (53.8; 95% CI [29.4, 78.2]; t = 4.35; p < 0.0001), quadriceps strength (21.7%; 95% CI [19.3%, 24.9%]; t = 2.53; p = 0.01), hamstring strength (44.7%; 95% CI [43.4%, 45.7%], t = 3.17; p = 0.002) and higher residual knee pain (0.53; 95% CI [0.04, 1.03]; t = 2.17; p = 0.03) 1 month after total knee arthroplasty compared to those referred directly to outpatient physical therapy. Conclusions: These findings suggest that patients discharged directly to outpatient physical therapy had a more rapid recovery 1 month after total knee arthroplasty. Additional research is needed to investigate the potential causal relation between care pathways and clinical outcomes following total knee arthroplasty. Total knee arthroplasty, typically performed to alleviate end-stage knee osteoarthritis, is the most commonly performed elective surgery in the United States. Despite improvement in pain, objective measurements of functional performance and strength often remain at preoperative levels one year after total knee arthroplasty. Patients discharged directly to higher intensity outpatient physical therapy have a more rapid recovery after total knee arthroplasty compared with those patients who received two weeks of home health prior to undergoing outpatient physical therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of a single-session of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and an rTMS intervention on neurophysiology and motor control in survivors of stroke. METHODS: Twelve stroke survivors were randomized into functional-rTMS or passive-rTMS conditions. Measures of short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF), and force steadiness (coefficient of variation, CV) at 10 and 20% of maximum voluntary contraction were assessed at baseline and after a single-session of rTMS (post single-session), and again following an intervention of 8 rTMS sessions (2 sessions per day; post-intervention). Functional-rTMS required subjects to exceed a muscle activation threshold assessed by surface electromyography to trigger each rTMS train; the passive-rTMS group received rTMS while relaxed. RESULTS: ICF scores significantly increased following the single-session of functional-rTMS compared to the decrease following passive-rTMS. The increase in APB SICI and ICF scores following the intervention was significantly greater for the functional-rTMS group compared to the decreases following passive-rTMS. The groups were significantly different in the CV of force (20%) following the single-session of rTMS, and in the 10 and 20% tasks following the intervention. The functional-rTMS group increased steadiness overtime, whereas the passive group demonstrated a return to baseline following the intervention session. No differences were observed in first dorsal interosseus (FDI) measures (SICI and ICF) between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The functional-rTMS protocol enhanced cortical excitability following a single-session and after repeated sessions and improved steadiness, whereas the passive stimulation protocol tended to decrease excitation and no improvements in steadiness were observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]