Search

Abnormal hip joint contact forces (HJCF) are considered a primary mechanical contributor to the progression of hip osteoarthritis (OA). Compared to healthy controls, people with hip OA often present with altered muscle activation patterns and greater muscle co-contraction, both of which can influence HJCF. Neuromusculoskeletal (NMS) modelling is non-invasive approach to estimating HJCF, whereby different neural control solutions can be used to estimate muscle forces. Static optimisation, available within the popular NMS modelling software OpenSim, is a commonly used neural control solution, but may not account for an individual's unique muscle activation patterns and/or co-contraction that are often evident in pathological population. Alternatively, electromyography (EMG)-assisted neural control solutions, available within CEINMS software, have been shown to account for individual activation patterns in healthy people. Nonetheless, their application in people with hip OA, with conceivably greater levels of co-contraction, is yet to be explored. The aim of this study was to compare HJCF estimations using static optimisation (in OpenSim) and EMG-assisted (in CEINMS) neural control solutions during walking in people with hip OA. EMG-assisted neural control solution was more consistent with both EMG and joint moment data than static optimisation, and also predicted significantly higher HJCF peaks (p 0.001). The EMG-assisted neural control solution also accounted for more muscle co-contraction than static optimisation (p = 0.03), which probably contributed to these higher HJCF peaks. Findings suggest that the EMG-assisted neural control solution may estimate more physiologically plausible HJCF than static optimisation in a population with high levels of co-contraction, such as hip OA.

In-vivo hip joint contact forces (HJCF) can be estimated using computational neuromusculoskeletal (NMS) modelling. However, different neural solutions can result in different HJCF estimations. NMS model predictions are also influenced by the selection of neuromuscular parameters, which are either based on cadaveric data or calibrated to the individual. To date, the best combination of neural solution and parameter calibration to obtain plausible estimations of HJCF have not been identified. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of three electromyography (EMG)-informed neural solution modes (EMG-driven, EMG-hybrid, and EMG-assisted) and static optimisation, each using three different parameter calibrations (uncalibrated, minimise joint moments error, and minimise joint moments error and peak HJCF), on the estimation of HJCF in a healthy population (n = 23) during walking. When compared to existing in-vivo data, the EMG-assisted mode and static optimisation produced the most physiologically plausible HJCF when using a NMS model calibrated to minimise joint moments error and peak HJCF. EMG-assisted mode produced first and second peaks of 3.55 times body weight (BW) and 3.97 BW during walking; static optimisation produced 3.75 BW and 4.19 BW, respectively. However, compared to static optimisation, EMG-assisted mode generated muscle excitations closer to recorded EMG signals (average across hip muscles R2 = 0.60 ± 0.37 versus R2 = 0.12 ± 0.14). Findings suggest that the EMG-assisted mode combined with minimise joint moments error and peak HJCF calibration is preferable for the estimation of HJCF and generation of realistic load distribution across muscles.

Gait analysis together with musculoskeletal modeling is widely used for research. In the absence of medical images, surface marker locations are used to scale a generic model to the individual’s anthropometry. Studies evaluating the accuracy and reliability of different scaling approaches in a pediatric and/or clinical population have not yet been conducted and, therefore, formed the aim of this study. Magnetic resonance images (MRI) and motion capture data were collected from 12 participants with cerebral palsy and 6 typically developed participants. Accuracy was assessed by comparing the scaled model’s segment measures to the corresponding MRI measures, whereas reliability was assessed by comparing the model’s segments scaled with the experimental marker locations from the first and second motion capture session. The inclusion of joint centers into the scaling process significantly increased the accuracy of thigh and shank segment length estimates compared to scaling with markers alone. Pelvis scaling approaches which included the pelvis depth measure led to the highest errors compared to the MRI measures. Reliability was similar between scaling approaches with mean ICC of 0.97. The pelvis should be scaled using pelvic width and height and the thigh and shank segment should be scaled using the proximal and distal joint centers.

A B S T R A C T Crouch gait decreases walking efficiency due to the increased knee and hip flexion during the stance phase of gait. Crouch gait is generally considered to be disadvantageous for children with cerebral palsy; however, a crouched posture may allow biomechanical advantages that lead some children to adopt a crouch gait. To investigate one possible advantage of crouch gait, a musculoskeletal model created in OpenSim was placed in 15 different postures from upright to severe crouch during initial, middle, and final stance of the gait cycle for a total of 45 different postures. A series of optimizations was performed for each posture to maximize transverse plane ground reaction forces in the eight compass directions by modifying muscle forces acting on the model. We compared the force profile areas across all postures. Larger force profile areas were allowed by postures from mild crouch (for initial stance) to crouch (for final stance). The overall ability to generate larger ground reaction force profiles represents a mechanical advantage of a crouched posture. This increase in muscle capacity while in a crouched posture may allow a patient to generate new movements to compensate for impairments associated with cerebral palsy, such as motor control deficits.