Search

Understanding the Heat transfer performance of refrigerant for convective boiling in horizontal microfin tube and smooth tube is place an importance role on the designing of evaporator, the main equipment on refrigeration system. Reviewing the general concept especially the theory of boiling in the tube, the formation of the flow pattern map, the calculating procedure for heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop during boiling process of refrigerant in microfin tube. Besides, a typical example will be presented more detail in step by step to define the heat transfer coefficient and pressure drop for one working condition to estimate the data results without doing experiments.

Environmental concerns are forcing the replacement of commonly used refrigerants, and finding new fluids is a top priority. Soon the R134a will be banned, and the hydro-fluoro-olefin (HFO) R1234ze(E) has been indicated as an alternative due to its smaller global warming potential (GWP) and shorter atmospheric lifetime. Nevertheless, for an optimal replacement, its thermo-fluid-dynamic characteristics have to be assessed. Flow boiling experiments (saturation temperature Tsat = 5 °C, mass flux G = 65 ÷ 222 kg·m−2·s−1, mean quality xm = 0.15 ÷ 0.95, quality changes ∆x = 0.06 ÷ 0.6) inside a microfin tube were performed to compare the pressure drop per unit length and the heat transfer coefficient provided by the two fluids. The results were benchmarked for some correlations. In commonly adopted operating conditions, the two fluids show a very similar behavior, while benchmark showed that some correlations are available to properly predict the pressure drop for both fluids. However, only one is satisfactory for the heat transfer coefficient. In conclusion, R1234ze(E) proved to be a suitable drop-in replacement for the R134a, whereas further efforts are recommended to refine and adapt the available predictive models.

This study analyses the performance of heat transfer process which occurs in the convective boiling of Hydro fluoro Olefin (HFO) refrigerant, R1234yf, in horizontal tube. Heat transfer and pressure drop of R1234yf are analyzed and computed at the same working conditions on the same size of outer diameter of tube do = 9.52 mm with difference of inner surface, one is a smooth surface and microfin for other. The flow pattern maps were built at 5°C saturation temperature with 8.62 kW/m2of heat flux, it is presented that flow pattern of helix flow occurs at very low mass flux and low quality, while at that condition on smooth tube the flow is still stratified wavy flow. The comparison of heat transfer performance between microfin and smooth tube would be evaluated on enhancement factorE, penalty factorPand efficiency indexI. With the mass flux on the rangeG= 111 -- 333 kg/m2s for 5°C boiling temperature, the results show that, average value ofEis 2.18; 1.45 ofPand 1.54 ofI. One more impressing thing is that, at the quality “x” larger than 0.8, the dryout phenomenon takes place on smooth tubes while microfin tubes do not have this phenomenon.

An experimental facility was designed to measure pressure drop and heat transfer coefficient during flow boiling of azeotropic refrigerants in horizontal tubes. The apparatus is made of the refrigerant circuit, including the test section; the water circuit, to provide the power for evaporation; the glycol-water circuit, to fix the refrigerant pressure. The test section is a counterflow tube-in-tube heat exchanger (refrigerant inside, water outside). Plant assessment involved the measurement of pressure drop and heat transfer during R134a flow boiling in a smooth tube (outer diameter 9.56mm, inner diameter 8.92mm). Such a case study is a benchmark for the availability of a wide experimental database in the literature, which has been also summarized in many correlations. Then further tests involved a microfin tube. The experimental conditions were: evaporation temperature, 5°C; mass flux, 111÷333kg/m2s; average quality, 0.15÷0.93; heat flux, 8.8kW/m2 and 17.6kW/m2. The uncertainty affecting the pressure drop and the heat transfer coefficient resulted lower than 1% and 5% respectively. The comparison with the literature shows satisfactory agreement with the major findings and enables using the data for the assessment of the existing models to predict both the pressure drop and the heat transfer coefficient.