Search

Schematic eye models have typically been used to explain the average monochromatic and chromatic imaging properties of the eye. Both monochromatic aberrations and transverse chromatic aberration are known to vary widely across subjects. However, to our knowledge, the ability of schematic eye models to predict these individual variations has not been tested experimentally. We used a spatially resolved refractometer to measure the monochromatic aberrations and the optical transverse chromatic aberration (oTCA) in a group of 15 eyes. By recording the 1st and 4th Purkinje images for five directions of gaze, we also estimated the tilt, misalignment of ocular surfaces (front surface of the cornea and back surface of the lens) and off-axis position of the fovea (angle alpha), as well as pupil centration. We conclude that, contrary to expectations none of those factors are major contributors to the variability in monochromatic aberrations and oTCA in this group of eyes. Simulations show that corneal curvature and corneal conicity are also unlikely to account for the observed relation between monochromatic aberrations and oTCA. Our results suggest an important contribution of corneal irregularities to those aberrations.

Purpose: To compare quantitatively three techniques to measure the optical aberrations of the human eye: laser ray tracing (LRT), the Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor (H-S), and the spatially resolved refractometer (SRR). LRT and H-S are objective imaging techniques, whereas SRR is psychophysical., Methods: Wave aberrations were measured in two normal subjects with all three techniques implemented in two different laboratories., Results: We compared the experimental variability of the results obtained with each technique with the overall variability across the three methods. For the two subjects measured (RMS wavefront error 0.5 microm and 0.9 microm, respectively), we found a close agreement; the average standard deviation of the Zernike coefficients within a given method was 0.07 microm, whereas the average global standard deviation across techniques was 0.09 microm, which is only slightly higher., Conclusions: There is a close match between the Zernike coefficients obtained by LRT, H-S, and SRR. Thus, all three techniques provide similar information concerning wave aberration when applied to normal human eyes. However, the methods are operationally different, and each has advantages and disadvantages depending on the particular application.

We measured the ocular wavefront aberration at six different visible wavelengths (between 450 and 650 nm) in three subjects, using a spatially resolved refractometer. In this technique, the angular deviation of light rays entering the pupil at different locations is measured with respect to a target viewed through a centered pupil. Fits of the data at each wavelength to Zernike polynomials were used to estimate the change of defocus with wavelength (longitudinal chromatic aberration, LCA) and the wavelength-dependence of the ocular aberrations. Measured LCA was in good agreement with the literature. In most cases the wavefront aberration increased slightly with wavelength. The angular deviations from the reference stimulus measured using a magenta filter allowed us to estimate the achromatic axis and both optical and perceived transverse chromatic aberration (TCA), (including the effect of aberrations and Stiles-Crawford effect). The amount of TCA varied markedly across subjects, and between eyes of the same subject. Finally, we used the results from these experiments to compute the image quality of the eye in polychromatic light.

We used a fast psychophysical procedure to determine the wave-front aberrations of the human eye in vivo. We measured the angular deviation of light rays entering the eye at different pupillary locations by aligning an image of a point source entering the pupil at different locations to the image of a fixation cross entering the pupil at a fixed location. We fitted the data to a Zernike series to reconstruct the wave-front aberrations of the pupil. With this technique the repeatability of the measurement of the individual coefficients was 0.019 micron. The standard deviation of the overall wave-height estimation across the pupil is less than 0.3 micron. Since this technique does not require the administration of pharmacological agents to dilate the pupil, we were able to measure the changes in the aberrations of the eye during accommodation. We found that administration of even a mild dilating agent causes a change in the aberration structure of the eye.