1. Anoabdominal rectal resection and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis: 10 years' experience.
- Author
-
Kusunoki M, Yanagi H, Shoji Y, Yamamura T, and Utsunomiya J
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anal Canal surgery, Anastomosis, Surgical adverse effects, Anastomosis, Surgical methods, Anastomosis, Surgical mortality, Brachytherapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Proctocolectomy, Restorative adverse effects, Proctocolectomy, Restorative mortality, Rectal Neoplasms radiotherapy, Retrospective Studies, Survival Analysis, Survival Rate, Treatment Outcome, Proctocolectomy, Restorative methods, Rectal Neoplasms surgery, Rectum surgery
- Abstract
Background: Coloanal anastomosis and radiotherapy for the treatment of lower rectal carcinoma have been receiving increasing attention., Methods: Patients with rectal cancer were divided into two groups: anoabdominal rectal resection and colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis (CAA) plus preoperative intraluminal brachytherapy (IBT) (group 1; 68 patients) and CAA without IBT (group 2; 23 patients). Group 3, comprising 59 patients who underwent abdominoperineal excision (APE), was examined as a control group. Comparative results were reviewed., Results: Postoperative complications occurred more frequently in group 1 than in group 2. Actuarial 5-year survival rates were 73 per cent in group 1, 64 per cent in group 2 and 63 per cent in group 3. Cumulative local recurrence rates at 5 years were 11 per cent in group 1, 38 per cent in group 2 and 21 per cent in group 3. Intestinal continuity breakdown was seen in 14 per cent of all patients at 5 years after initial operation., Conclusion: The combination of CAA and preoperative IBT resulted in decreased local recurrence. IBT followed by CAA can be a good restorative option for combating lower rectal cancer.
- Published
- 1997