Search

Although it is widely accepted that familiarity could support associative recognition when the to‐be‐learn items are 'unitized' into a new representation, the effects of unitization on associative recognition and recollection remain much debated. The current study aimed to explain these debates by exploring when and how unitization benefits associative recognition using event‐related potentials (ERPs). During the encoding phase, participants learned compound words and unrelated word pairs (i.e., High vs. Low level of unitization). At retrieval, the compound words were rearranged into new compound words (i.e., no‐change) and unrelated word pairs (i.e., change). Similarly, the unrelated word pairs were rearranged into new unrelated word pairs (i.e., no‐change) and compound words (i.e., change). Results showed that under the no‐change condition, unitization did not affect associative recognition, nor its underlying processes. In contrast, under the change condition, unitization improved associative recognition by increasing both familiarity‐related FN400 effect and recollection‐related LPC effect. In addition, a planned comparison between the compound‐change and unrelated‐no change conditions—a common index for unitization effect in past studies—revealed that unitization could not only elicit significant FN400 effect, but also improve associative recognition by increasing LPC effect. Collectively, these results not only allowed to explain the current discrepancies in the literature concerning the effect of unitization on associative recognition, but also emphasized the importance of matching the level of unitization between the studied and rearranged word pairs. Although most studies have suggested enhanced familiarity‐based associative recognition when the to‐be‐learned items are unitized, the effects of unitization on associative recognition and recollection remain controversial. The current study aims to explain this controversy by manipulating the level of unitization within word pairs, both at encoding and when rearranged. Collectively, results could not only explain current discrepancies in the literature, but also emphasize the importance of matching the level of unitization between the studied and rearranged word pairs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is widely accepted that unitization can promote familiarity-based associative recognition, but the effect of unitization on item recognition remains unclear. The goals of this study were to elaborate on how unitization affected item recognition and the neural correlates of familiarity and recollection for item recognition. In study, the participants were asked to learn related and unrelated picture pairs, and in test, they were required to distinguish single old pictures form new pictures. In experiment 1, we used R/K/N paradigm to estimate the contribution of familiarity and recollection to item recognition, the results showed that unitization could improve item recognition through increasing recollection selectively. In experiment 2, we used ERP old/new effects to estimate the neural correlates of familiarity and recollection, the results showed that unitization could improve item recognition through a selective reduction in LPC effect. Inspired by DRM paradigm, in experiment 3, we divided the new pictures into semantically related lure pictures and semantically unrelated new pictures to explore the effects of unitization on item recognition and verbatim recognition (the ability to distinguish old pictures from lure pictures). The behavioral results showed that unitization could improve item recognition, but it damaged verbatim recognition. The ERP results revealed that there were larger LPC effects in the unrelated condition than in the related condition, regardless of item or verbatim recognition. In summary, we believed that unitization could indeed improve item recognition, but it damaged verbatim recognition. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

It is widely accepted that familiarity can support associative memory when the to-be-remember items are unitized into a new representation. However, there has been relatively little attention devoted to investigating the effects of different unitization manipulations on associative memory. The present study aimed to address this gap by examining the effects of varying levels of unitization through three tasks: Concept definition, interactive imagery, and sentence frame tasks. The behavioral results revealed that associative memory was significantly enhanced in the interactive imagery task compared to the sentence frame task. However, no significant differences were found between the sentence frame and concept definition tasks, or between the concept definition and interactive imagery tasks. In terms of the neural correlates, the event-related potential (ERP) results revealed that the sentence frame task only elicited a significant recollection-related LPC old/new effect, while the concept definition task only elicited a significant familiarity-related FN400 old/new effect. However, the interactive representation task elicited both of these distinct effects. These findings suggest that both the concept definition and interactive imagery tasks can enhance familiarity for supporting associative memory, but their beneficial effects on associative memory or LPC old/new effects may be different. • Direct comparison of the effects of concept definition and interactive imagery tasks on associative memory • The concept definition task can enhance familiarity to support associative memory without relying on recollection • Both unitization-promoting tasks are meaningful for individuals with impaired recollection but preserved familiarity [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Unitization does not impede overall item recognition performance. • Unitization can maintain item recognition through less overall neural processing. • Both neural correlates of familiarity and recollection contributed to item recognition. • We use Bayesian analysis to explain the null results to ensure the reliability of the results. It is widely accepted that unitization can promote familiarity-based associative recognition, but the role of unitization in recognition of individual component elements which originate from compound words remains unclear. The goals of this study were to elaborate on how unitization affects item recognition and further examine the effect of unitization on the extent to which familiarity and recollection contribute to item recognition. During the study phase, participants were asked to learn 48 compound words and 48 unrelated word pairs, and during the test phase, they were instructed to distinguish old from new words. We disassociated the contribution of familiarity and recollection to recognition with remember/know paradigm in experiment 1 and with ERPs old/new effects in experiment 2. The results showed that the overall item recognition was equivalent between the two retrieval conditions. Disassociation the contribution of familiarity and recollection, we found that there was higher recollection-based item recognition performance for compound-old words than for unrelated-old words in experiment 1. In contrast, in experiment 2, the magnitude of later parietal old/new effect related to recollection was larger for the former than for the latter, indicating that equivalent levels of memory retrieval were achieved through "less" neural correlates of familiarity and recollection. By synthesizing the results of experiment 1 and 2, we believed unitization did not impede overall item recognition performance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]