Search

The functional properties of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are intimately associated with the different components in their cellular environment. Among them, sodium ions have been proposed to play a substantial role as endogenous allosteric modulators of GPCR-mediated signaling. However, this sodium effect and the underlying mechanisms are still unclear for most GPCRs. Here, we identified sodium as a negative allosteric modulator of the ghrelin receptor GHSR (growth hormone secretagogue receptor). Combining 23 Na-nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), molecular dynamics, and mutagenesis, we provide evidence that, in GHSR, sodium binds to the allosteric site conserved in class A GPCRs. We further leveraged spectroscopic and functional assays to show that sodium binding shifts the conformational equilibrium toward the GHSR-inactive ensemble, thereby decreasing basal and agonist-induced receptor-catalyzed G protein activation. All together, these data point to sodium as an allosteric modulator of GHSR, making this ion an integral component of the ghrelin signaling machinery., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

There is increasing support for water molecules playing a role in signal propagation through G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). However, exploration of the hydration features of GPCRs is still in its infancy. Here, we combined site-specific labeling with unnatural amino acids to molecular dynamics to delineate how local hydration of the ghrelin receptor growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR) is rearranged upon activation. We found that GHSR is characterized by a specific hydration pattern that is selectively remodeled by pharmacologically distinct ligands and by the lipid environment. This process is directly related to the concerted movements of the transmembrane domains of the receptor. These results demonstrate that the conformational dynamics of GHSR are tightly coupled to the movements of internal water molecules, further enhancing our understanding of the molecular bases of GPCR-mediated signaling., Competing Interests: ML, MC, MD, MC, PR, AG, PB, CM, SM, SC, SD, KB, DP, PB, JF, LC, NF, JB No competing interests declared, (© 2021, Louet et al.)

The membrane is an integral component of the G protein-coupled receptor signaling machinery. Here we demonstrate that lipids regulate the signaling efficacy and selectivity of the ghrelin receptor GHSR through specific interactions and bulk effects. We find that PIP2 shifts the conformational equilibrium of GHSR away from its inactive state, favoring basal and agonist-induced G protein activation. This occurs because of a preferential binding of PIP2 to specific intracellular sites in the receptor active state. Another lipid, GM3, also binds GHSR and favors G protein activation, but mostly in a ghrelin-dependent manner. Finally, we find that not only selective interactions but also the thickness of the bilayer reshapes the conformational repertoire of GHSR, with direct consequences on G protein selectivity. Taken together, this data illuminates the multifaceted role of the membrane components as allosteric modulators of how ghrelin signal could be propagated.

The growth hormone secretagogue receptor (GHSR) and dopamine receptor (D2R) have been shown to oligomerize in hypothalamic neurons with a significant effect on dopamine signaling, but the molecular processes underlying this effect are still obscure. We used here the purified GHSR and D2R to establish that these two receptors assemble in a lipid environment as a tetrameric complex composed of two each of the receptors. This complex further recruits G proteins to give rise to an assembly with only two G protein trimers bound to a receptor tetramer. We further demonstrate that receptor heteromerization directly impacts on dopamine-mediated Gi protein activation by modulating the conformation of its α-subunit. Indeed, association to the purified GHSR:D2R heteromer triggers a different active conformation of Gαi that is linked to a higher rate of GTP binding and a faster dissociation from the heteromeric receptor. This is an additional mechanism to expand the repertoire of GPCR signaling modulation that could have implications for the control of dopamine signaling in normal and physiopathological conditions., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

How G protein-coupled receptor conformational dynamics control G protein coupling to trigger signaling is a key but still open question. We addressed this question with a model system composed of the purified ghrelin receptor assembled into lipid discs. Combining receptor labeling through genetic incorporation of unnatural amino acids, lanthanide resonance energy transfer, and normal mode analyses, we directly demonstrate the occurrence of two distinct receptor:Gq assemblies with different geometries whose relative populations parallel the activation state of the receptor. The first of these assemblies is a preassembled complex with the receptor in its basal conformation. This complex is specific of Gq and is not observed with Gi. The second one is an active assembly in which the receptor in its active conformation triggers G protein activation. The active complex is present even in the absence of agonist, in a direct relationship with the high constitutive activity of the ghrelin receptor. These data provide direct evidence of a mechanism for ghrelin receptor-mediated Gq signaling in which transition of the receptor from an inactive to an active conformation is accompanied by a rearrangement of a preassembled receptor:G protein complex, ultimately leading to G protein activation and signaling.

The dynamic character of G protein-coupled receptors is essential to their function. However, the details of how ligands stabilize a particular conformation to selectively activate a signaling pathway and how signaling proteins affect this conformational repertoire remain unclear. Using a prototypical peptide-activated class A G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), the ghrelin receptor, reconstituted as a monomer into lipid discs and labeled with a fluorescent conformational reporter, we demonstrate that ligand efficacy and functional selectivity are directly related to different receptor conformations. Of importance, our data bring direct evidence that distinct effector proteins affect the conformational landscape of the ghrelin receptor in different ways. Whereas G proteins affect the balance between active and inactive receptor substates in favor of the active state, agonist-induced arrestin recruitment is accompanied by a marked change in the structural features of the receptor that adopt a conformation different from that observed in the absence of arrestin. In contrast to G proteins and arrestins, μ-AP2 has no significant effect on the organization of the transmembrane core of the receptor. Such a modulation of a GPCR conformational landscape by pharmacologically distinct ligands and effectors provides insights into the structural bases that decisively affect ligand efficacy and subsequent biological responses. This is also likely to have major implications for the design of drugs activating specific GPCR-associated signaling pathways.

The human ghrelin receptor (GHS-R1a) is known to display a high level of signaling in the absence of ligand. The Trp276, located in the fully conserved CWXP motif of G protein-coupled receptors, is believed to function as a rotameric switch in these receptors. A comparative modelling of GHS-R1a with the motilin receptor, the most related G protein-coupled receptor to GHS-R1a known to date, but characterized by a very low ligand-independent signaling level, revealed that only two surrounding residues of Trp276, that are Val131 and Ile134, were different from these receptors. We mutated them at once in GHS-R1a to create a "motilin receptor-like" environment of Trp276 in order to study the consequences on GHS-R1a activation. We studied the pharmacological properties of the W276A, V131L-I134M GHS-R1a mutants. Basal as well as maximal ghrelin-induced signaling was assessed both by inositol-phosphate accumulation and SRE pathways. As compared to the wild type receptor, the SRE-luciferase assay displayed a markedly impaired basal activity for W276A whereas that of V131L-I134M was, strikingly, two fold increased. Nevertheless, the efficacy of ghrelin to bind or to stimulate mutant receptors remained unchanged. It is concluded that Trp276, Val131 and Ile134 have a significant impact on constitutive signaling of GHS-R1a, V131L-I134M being the first example of a GHS-R1a mutant with a higher basal activity than the wild type receptor., (2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Three homology models of the human ghrelin receptor (GHS-R1a) have been generated from the available X-ray structures of rhodopsin (RHO model), opsin (OPS model) and beta-2 adrenergic receptor (B2 model). The latter was used as a starting point for combined molecular dynamics simulation (MDS) and full atom normal modes analysis (NMA). A low-frequency normal mode (mode 16) perfectly reproduced the intracellular motions observed between B2 and RHO models; in the opposite direction along the same mode, the generated structures are closer to the OPS model, suggesting a direct link with GHS-R1a activation. This was in agreement with motions of the seven transmembranous segments, increase of the solvent accessibility of the 140-ERY-142 sequence, and flip of the Trp276 (C WLP) residue, some features related to GPCRs activation. According to our model, His280 was proposed to stabilize Trp276 in the active state; this was verified by site-directed mutagenesis and biochemical characterization of the resulting H280A and H280S mutants, which were fully functional but sharing an important decrease of their basal activities. Docking performed with short ghrelin derivatives Gly-Ser-Ser ([octa])-Phe-NH (2) and Gly-Ser-Ser ([octa])-Phe-Leu-NH (2) allowed the identification of a robust position of these peptides in the active site of the receptor. This model was refined by MDS and validated by docking experiments performed on a set of 55 ghrelin receptor ligands based on the 1,2,4- triazole scaffold. Finally, NMA performed on the obtained peptide-receptor complex suggested stabilization of the Trp276 residue and of the whole receptor in the active state, preventing the motion observed along mode 16 computed for the unbound receptor. Our results show that NMA offers a powerful approach to study the conformational diversity and the activation mechanism of GPCRs.