Search

Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer mortality in women globally. Despite advancements in systemic therapy, the risk of distant recurrence persists even after such treatment and may be linked to disseminated tumor cells (DTCs). Variability in molecular characteristics between primary tumors (PTs) and distant metastases underscores the need to comprehensively understand metastatic pathways. This retrospective study investigated discrepancies between HER2 expression in PTs and DTCs and their implications for survival outcomes in 201 early breast cancer (EBC) patients. We found a significant association between HER2 expression in PTs and DTCs when classifying tumors as HER2-high/low/negative. Patients whose HER2 status was discordant between PTs and DTCs exhibited worse distant disease-free survival than those with concordant status. Multivariate analysis confirmed the HER2 status of DTCs as an independent prognostic factor for distant DFS. These findings emphasize the importance of assessing HER2 expression in DTCs and its potential implications for tailored therapy strategies in EBC. Furthermore, prospective trials are needed to validate these findings and explore targeted therapies based on the molecular characteristics of DTCs.

Purpose: Assessment of HER2 overexpression using immunohistochemistry (IHC) and/or in situ hybridisation (ISH) for the detection of HER2 amplifications is standard to identify patients for established HER2-directed treatments. Patients with lower HER2 expression levels have recently also become candidates for novel therapies targeting HER2. This study aimed to assess tumour and patient characteristics and prognosis in patients with advanced breast cancer (aBC), relative to low HER2 expression levels., Methods: PRAEGNANT is a prospective aBC registry (NCT02338167), focusing on molecular biomarkers. Patients in all therapy lines receiving any kind of treatment are eligible. This analysis includes patients with conventionally HER2-negative aBC. Clinical outcome was compared in the groups with no (IHC score 0) or with low HER2 expression (IHC 1+, or IHC 2+/ISH negative)., Results: Low HER2 expression levels in triple-negative aBC patients did not influence progression-free survival. Overall survival appeared poorer in patients with IHC 2+ compared with patients with no HER2 expression in the unadjusted analysis (hazard ratio 2.24, 95% confidence interval 0.1.12-4.47). However, this effect was not maintained in the adjusted analysis. In HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive patients, low HER2 expression appeared to have no effect on prognosis, neither progression-free survival nor overall survival., Conclusions: We could not demonstrate that HER2 expression at a low level and assessed in clinical routine can differentiate patients into prognostic groups. However, the prevalence of patients with a low expression makes this population interesting for clinical trials with potentially active treatments using HER2 as a target., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: A.D.H. has received honoraria from Teva, GenomicHealth, Celgene, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche; J.E. has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Lilly, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche and Pfizer; M.P.L. has received honoraria from Pfizer, Lilly, Roche, MSD, Hexal, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Eisai, medac and Exact Sciences for advisory boards, lectures and travel support; B.V. has received honoraria from Novartis; F.A.T. has received honoraria from Hexal, Novartis, Tesaro and travel expenses from GSK; F.O. received speaker and consultancy honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer, Celgene, Cellex, Chugai, Gilead, Hexal, Ipsen, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, MSD, Novartis, Riemser, Roche, Tesaro and Teva; P.H. received honoraria, unrestricted educational grants and research funding from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer and Roche; H.T. has received honoraria from Novartis, Roche, Celgene, TEVA and Pfizer, and travel support from Roche, Celgene and Pfizer; J.E. has received honoraria from AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Lilly, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Roche and Pfizer; D.L. has received honoraria from Amgen, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, MSD, Hexal, Novartis, AstraZeneca, TEVA, Celgene, Eisai, and Loreal. M.W. has received speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca, Celgene and Novartis; V.M. has received speaker honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Roche, Teva, Seattle Genetics and consultancy honoraria from Genomic Health, Hexal, Roche, Pierre Fabre, Amgen, ClinSol, Novartis, MSD, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Lilly, Tesaro and Nektar; E.B. has received honoraria from Novartis, Pfizer, Amgen, Daiichi-Sankyo and onkowissen.de; C.H. has received honoraria from Roche Pharma, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novartis and Onkovis; C.M.K. received honoraria from Amgen, Axios, Roche, Teva, Novartis, MSD Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, NewCo, Pfizer, Riemser and ZytoService, research grants from Amgen, Axios, Novartis, MSD Sharp & Dohme, NewCo, Pfizer and ZytoService, and travel support from Amgen, Paxman Inc., PharmaMar and Pfizer; R.W. has received honoraria from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Daiichi-Sankyo, Esai, Exact Science, Nanostring, GSK, Hexal, Lilly, MSD, Mundipharma, Novartis, Odonate, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, Riemser, Roche, Sandoz, Seattle Genetics, Tesaro Bio, Teva and Viatris; C.T. has received honoraria from Roche, Daiichi-Sankyo and AstraZeneca; M.U. has received honoraria from Abbvie, Amgen, AstraZeneca, BMS, Celgene, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Lilly Deutschland, Lilly Int., MSD Merck, Mundipharma, Myriad Genetics, Odonate, Pfizer, PUMA Biotechnology, Roche Pharma, Sanofi Aventis Deutschland, TEVA Pharmaceuticals Ind Ltd, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Clovis Oncology and Seattle Genetics; P.A.F. received honoraria from Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Amgen, Celgene, Daiichi-Sankyo, AstraZeneca, Merck-Sharp & Dohme, Eisai, Puma and Teva, his institution conducts research with funding from Novartis and Biontech; W.J. has received honoraria and research grants from Sanofi-Aventis, Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, Chugai, AstraZeneca, MSD and Daiichi-Sankyo; T.N.F. has received honoraria from Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, TEVA, Diachii Sankyo, AstraZeneca and MSD; S.Y.B. has received honoraria from Roche Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, Teva and AstraZeneca. A.S. has received honoraria from Roche, AstraZeneca, Aurikamed GmbH, Celgene, ClinSol Research GmbH, Connectmedica Sp.Z o.o., Deutsche Gesellschaft für Senologie GmbH, if-kongress management gmbh, I-MED Institute GmbH, Lilly Deutschland GmbH, Medicultus GmbH, med publico GmbH, MSD Sharp & Dohme GmbH, onkowissen.de GmbH, Pfizer GmbH, Schattauer Verlag GmbH, Promedicis GmbH, Tesaro Bio Germany GmbH and W. Zuckschwerdt Verlag GmbH; H.-C.K. has received honoraria from Carl Zeiss Meditec, Theraclion, Novartis, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, GSK, SurgVision, Onkowissen and Genomic Health/Exact Sciences, travel support from Tesaro and Daiichi-Sankyo and holds stock of Theraclion and Phaon scientific. All remaining others (A.H., L.H., L.A.W., M.W.B., P.W., D.W.) have declared that they do not have any conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) statuses are frequently discordant between the primary tumor and metastatic lesions in metastatic breast cancer. This can have important therapeutic implications., Patients and Methods: In all, 541 patients with available receptor statuses from both primary tumor and metastatic lesion treated at Heidelberg and Tuebingen University Hospitals between 1982 and 2018 were included., Results: Statistically significant discordance rates of 14% and 32% were found for ER and PR. HER2 status was statistically insignificantly discordant in 15% of patients. Gain in HER2 positivity was associated with an improved overall survival, whereas loss of HR positivity was associated with worse overall survival. Antiendocrine treatment differed in 20% of cases before and after biopsy and HER2-directed treatment in 14% of cases., Conclusions: Receptor statuses are discordant between primary tumor and metastasis in a considerable fraction of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Next to a highly presumed predictive value with respect to efficacy of endocrine and HER2-targeted therapy, discordance seems to provide prognostically relevant information. Where feasible, metastatic lesions should be biopsied in accordance with current guidelines.

Purpose: As an independent, negative-prognostic biomarker for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), circulating tumor cells (CTCs) constitute a promising component for developing a liquid biopsy for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The effects of HER2-targeted therapy such as trastuzumab, pertuzumab, T-DM1, and lapatinib on CTC status and longitudinal enumeration were assessed in this trial., Methods: CTC status of 264 patients with MBC was analyzed prior to and after 4 weeks of a new line of palliative systemic therapy. CTCs were assessed using CellSearch®. Three groups were compared: patients with HER2-positive MBC receiving ongoing HER2-targeted therapy (n = 28), patients with de novo HER2-positive MBC and no HER2-targeted therapy in the last 12 months prior to enrollment and start of HER2-targeted therapy (n = 15), and patients with HER2-nonamplified disease and no HER2-targeted therapy (n = 212)., Results: Positive CTC status (≥ 5 CTC/7.5 ml blood) at enrollment was observed in the 3 groups for 17.9, 46.7, and 46.2% (p = 0.02) of patients, respectively. At least one CTC/7.5 ml was seen in 28.6, 53.3, and 67.0% (p < 0.001) of these patients. Furthermore, 3.6, 40.0, and 3.3% (p < 0.001) of the patients had at least one HER2-positive CTC. After 4 weeks of therapy 7.1, 0.0, and 31.1% (p = 0.001) of patients had still a positive CTC status (≥ 5 CTC/7.5 ml blood). At least one CTC/7.5 ml was still observed in 25.0, 20.0, and 50.5% (p = 0.004) of the patients. Furthermore, 7.1, 0.0, and 1.9% (p = 0.187) had at least one HER2-positive CTC. After 3 months of therapy, 35.7, 20.0, and 28.3% (p = 0.536) showed disease progression., Conclusions: HER2-targeted therapy seems to reduce the overall CTC count in patients with MBC. This should be taken into account when CTC status is used as an indicator for aggressive or indolent metastatic tumor disease.

Purpose: Evidence shows that genetic and non-genetic risk factors for breast cancer (BC) differ relative to the molecular subtype. This analysis aimed to investigate associations between epidemiological risk factors and immunohistochemical subtypes in a cohort of postmenopausal, hormone receptor-positive BC patients., Methods: The prospective, single-arm, multicenter phase IV PreFace study (Evaluation of Predictive Factors Regarding the Effectivity of Aromatase Inhibitor Therapy) included 3529 postmenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive early BC. Data on their epidemiological risk factors were obtained from patients' diaries and their medical histories. Data on estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, and HER2 receptor status were obtained from pathology reports. Patients with incomplete information were excluded. Data were analyzed using conditional inference regression analysis, analysis of variance, and the chi-squared test., Results: In a cohort of 3392 patients, the strongest association with the molecular subtypes of BC was found for hormone replacement therapy (HRT) before diagnosis of early BC. The analysis showed that patients who took HRT at diagnosis had luminal A-like BC more often (83.7%) than those who had never taken HRT or had stopped taking it (75.5%). Luminal B-like BC and HER2-positive BC were diagnosed more often in women who had never taken HRT or had stopped taking it (13.3% and 11.2%, respectively) than in women who were taking HRT at diagnosis of BC (8.3% and 8.0%, respectively)., Conclusions: This analysis shows an association between HRT and the distribution of molecular subtypes of BC. However, no associations between other factors (e.g., age at diagnosis, body mass index, smoking status, age at menopause, number of deliveries, age at first delivery, breastfeeding history, or family history) were noted.

Background: In metastatic breast cancer (MBC), antigen profiles of metastatic tissue and primary tumor differ in up to 20 % of patients. Reassessment of predictive markers, including human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression, might help to optimize MBC treatment. While tissue sampling is invasive and often difficult to repeat, circulating tumor cell (CTC) analysis requires only a blood sample and might provide an easy-to-repeat, real-time "liquid biopsy" approach. The present retrospective study was conducted to compare HER2 expression in primary tumors, metastatic tissue, and circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from MBC patients and to analyze the potential impact of HER2 overexpression by CTCs on progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in MBC., Methods: CTC-positive (five or more CTCs/7.5 mL blood; CellSearch®, Janssen Diagnostics) MBC patients starting a new line of systemic treatment were eligible for the study. HER2 status of CTCs was determined by immunofluorescence (CellSearch®). HER2 status of primary (PRIM) and metastatic (MET) tumor tissue was determined by immunohistochemistry. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier plots., Results: One hundred seven patients (median age (range) 57 (33-81) years) were included. 100/107 (93%) patients were followed-up for a median [95% confidence interval (CI)] of 28.5 [25.1-40.1] months. Of 37/107 (35%) CTC-HER2-positive patients only 10 (27%) were PRIM-HER2-positive. 6/46 (13%) patients were MET-HER2-positive; only 2/10 (20%) CTC-HER2-positive patients were MET-HER2-positive. Overall accuracy between CTC-HER2 expression and PRIM-HER2 and MET-HER2 status was 69% and 74%, respectively. Kaplan-Meier plots of PFS and OS by CTC-HER2 status revealed significantly longer median [95% CI] PFS of CTC-HER2-positive versus CTC-HER2-negative patients (7.4 [4.7-13.7] versus 4.34 [3.5-5.9] months; p = 0.035). CTC-HER2-positive status showed no significant difference for OS (13.7 [7.7-30.0] versus 8.7 [5.9-15.3] months; p = 0.287)., Conclusions: HER2 status can change during the course of breast cancer. CTC phenotyping may serve as an easy-to-perform "liquid biopsy" to reevaluate HER2 status and potentially guide treatment decisions. Further, prospective studies are needed.

Overexpression of the HER2-receptor in early breast cancer (EBC) patients is associated with aggressive tumor behavior. However, women suffering from HER2-positive EBC benefit from trastuzumab treatment. As the HER2 status of the primary tumor may differ from that of disseminated tumor cells (DTC) in bone marrow (BM), the aim of this study was (1) to compare the HER2 status of the primary tumor (prim-HER2-status) with that of DTC (DTC-HER2-status) and (2) to analyze the influence of the DTC-HER2-status on patient survival. For this purpose, BM aspirates from 569 EBC patients were analyzed for the presence of DTC. The DTC-HER2-status was identified by a double-staining procedure against cytokeratin and the HER2-receptor. DTC were detected in 151 (27 %) patients. The concordance between the HER2 status of DTC and the primary tumor was 51 %. In patients with detectable DTC, mean disease-free survival was 77.44 (95 % CI 74.72-80.17) months for DTC-HER2-negative and 55.15 (95 % CI 48.57-61.79) months for DTC-HER2-positive patients (p = 0.044). The multivariate analysis showed that the DTC-HER2-status was an independent predictor of disease-free survival. In conclusion, the presence of HER2-positive DTC in EBC patients is associated with an increased risk of relapse. Due to the low concordance between the HER2 status of the primary tumor and DTC, only a minority (13 %) of the DTC-HER2-positive patients was treated with trastuzumab. These patients might, however, benefit from HER2-directed therapy.

The presence of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the blood as well as disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) in the bone marrow of breast cancer patients is associated with a worsened prognosis in the primary as well as in the metastatic situation. Next to their detection, evaluation of human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2) expression is a valuable feature of CTCs/DTCs. As the HER2 status may change during disease progression CTCs/DTCs might (1) characterize the phenotype of minimal residual disease in the adjuvant setting and (2) serve as a "real time biopsy" of metastatic breast cancer. Phenotyping of CTCs/DTCs will thus help to understand mechanism of resistance to HER2-directed therapy. Moreover, patients that are likely to benefit from HER2-directed therapy despite a HER2-negative primary tumor might be identified.