Search

This study investigates the representation of the temporal progression of events by means of the causal change in a patient. Subjects were asked to verify the relationship between adjectives denoting a source and resulting feature of a patient. The features were presented either chronologically or inversely to a primed event context given by a verb (to cut: long-short vs. short-long). Effects on response time and on eye movement data show that the relationship between features presented chronologically is verified more easily than that between features presented inversely. Post hoc, however, we found that the effects of temporal order occurred only when subjects read the features more than once. Then, the relationship between the features is matched with the causal change implied by the event context (contextual strategy). When subjects read the features only once, subjects respond to the relationship between the features without taking into account the event context.

Accessing the temporal position of events (early or late in the event sequence) can influence the generation of predictions about upcoming events. However, it is unclear how the temporal position is processed strategically. To investigate this, we presented event pairs to 23 healthy volunteers manipulating temporal order (chronological, inverse) and temporal position (early, late). Pupil dilation, eye movements, and behavioral data, showed that chronological and early event pairs are processed with more ease than inverse and late event pairs. Indexed by the pupillary response late events and inversely presented event pairs elicited greater cognitive processing demands than early events and chronologically presented event pairs. Regarding eye movements, fixation duration was less sensitive to temporal position than to temporal order. Looking at each item of the event sequence only once was behaviorally more effective than looking multiple times at each event regardless of whether temporal position or temporal order was processed. These results emphasize that accessing temporal position and temporal order information results in dissociable behavioral patterns. While more cognitive resources are necessary for processing late and inverse items, change of information acquisition strategies turns out to be most effective when temporal order processing is required. (JINS, 2012,18, 351–360)

Scripts store the temporal order of component events of everyday activities as well as the temporal position of the events within the activity (early or late). When confronted with an activity, predictions are generated about how the component events will unfold. Thereby, an error-detection mechanism continuously monitors whether they unfold as anticipated or not in order to reveal errors in the unfolding activity. We investigated whether the temporal position "early" or "late" influenced the detection of errors using the pupillary response as an index of cognitive resource consumption. An event triplet consisting of three events was presented in a chronological or non-chronological temporal order. Crucially, the triplet focused either on the beginning (temporal position "early") or the end (temporal position "late") of an activity. We assumed that these position codes would be used to facilitate error detection when a non-chronological event was presented. Results showed that errors in the temporal order were detected more successfully in early than in late triplets. Results further suggest that strong predictions are formed about how an activity begins. Violations of this prediction must be overcome by zooming into the representation and allocating attention to the temporal position that consumes cognitive resources. Only after zooming in has taken place successfully may the position codes be used to anticipate temporal violations in unfolding event sequences.

Scripts are mental representations of activities in memory and are thought to be organized dimensionally in a temporal dimension. We investigated the cognitive strategies during the processing of temporal order of an event sequence to gain insight into the organization of scripts. Subjects were presented with triplets of script events (A - B - C). Fifty percent of the items included sequence violations at different positions within the triplet (late: A - C - B, or early: C - A - B). Reaction times indicate that subjects use an economical strategy by comparing the relative temporal positions of event pairs (e.g., A vs. B and if necessary B vs. C) and only attend to information that is necessary. Pupil data and error rates indicate that the temporal information of the complete sequence affects the decision process even if the first event pair indicates that temporal order has been violated. Results are seen as evidence of a dimensional structure of scripts.

Event knowledge includes persons and objects and their roles in the event. This study investigated whether the progression of patients from a source to a resulting feature, such as the progression of hair that is cut from long to short, forms part of event representations. Subjects were presented with an event prime followed by two adjectives and asked to judge whether the adjectives were interrelated. Results showed that the semantic interrelation of two adjectives is recognized faster and more accurately when the adjectives denote source and resulting features of the patient of the primed event (“cutting”: long–short). Furthermore, we found that presenting an event-related adjective in combination with an unrelated adjective makes it more difficult to recognize that the two adjectives are not interrelated, but only when the event-related adjective denotes a source feature. We argue that an inference mechanism automatically completes the representation of the event. We conclude that source and resulting features are represented in a goal-directed and chronological way.

Scripts of familiar activities store the temporal order of events. This enables us to generate predictions about which event will follow another. When an event does not unfold in the chronological order, a mismatch arises between the predictions and the external sensory input which is perceived as a conflict. The detection of this mismatch is accomplished by a comparison mechanism (Zacks et al., 2007; Barsalou, 2009). We have applied pupillometry to investigate the nature of this comparison process. We further tested for individual differences in the efficiency of the mismatch detection. Participants were presented the title of an event sequence to trigger predictions about the order in which events would unfold. Subsequently, three script events were presented one at a time. The events either unfolded in the correct chronological order or included temporal violations at different points within the event triplet. Violations of the temporal order had to be detected. As soon as it was detected, the trial had to be terminated. We found that a temporal violation elicited a large pupillary response in all individuals indicating that the comparison between the predictions and the external sensory input was accomplished online and worked equally well for all individuals. However, not all individuals terminated the trial after having detected the violation. Results showed that efficient individuals who responded adequately had a greater pupillary response than inefficient individuals suggesting that they invested more cognitive resources. The results are discussed in light of theories of behavioral performance and conflict-monitoring.