Search

Background Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves outcomes after out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. However, bleeding and thrombosis are common complications. We aimed to describe the incidence and predictors of bleeding and thrombosis and their association with in‐hospital mortality. Methods and Results Consecutive patients presenting with refractory ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest between December 2015 and March 2022 who met the criteria for extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation initiation at our center were included. Major bleeding was defined by the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization's criteria. Adjusted analyses were done to seek out risk factors for bleeding and thrombosis and evaluate their association with mortality. Major bleeding occurred in 135 of 200 patients (67.5%), with traumatic bleeding from cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 73 (36.5%). Baseline demographics and arrest characteristics were similar between groups. In multivariable analysis, decreasing levels of fibrinogen were independently associated with bleeding (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.98 per every 10 mg/dL rise [95% CI, 0.96–0.99]). Patients who died had a higher rate of bleeds per day (0.21 versus 0.03, P

BackgroundPulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) is often used as a surrogate for left-ventricular end-diastolic pressure in patients (LVEDP) who are on veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (V-A ECMO) support for cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest. However, the correlation between PCWP and LVEDP is not clear in the setting of V-A ECMO usage. We sought to evaluate this correlation in this case series.MethodsPatients were referred to our cardiac catheterization laboratory for invasive hemodynamic studies to assess their readiness for VA-ECMO decannulation. All patients underwent simultaneous left and right heart catheterization. Using standard techniques, we measured PCWP and LVEDP simultaneously. Continuous variables were reported as medians with interquartile ranges. The correlation between PCWP and LVEDP was evaluated using simple linear regression and reported as R2.ResultsFour patients underwent invasive hemodynamic studies 4 (2.5, 7) days after VA-ECMO cannulation. All four patients had suffered in-hospital cardiac arrest and had been put on VA-ECMO. At the baseline level of VA-ECMO flow of 4.1 (3.8, 4.4) L/min, the median LVEDP and PCWP were 6 (4, 7.5) mmHg and 12 (6.5, 16) mmHg, respectively. At the lowest level of VA-ECMO flow of 1.9 (1.6, 2.0) L/min, the median LVEDP and PCWP was 13.5 (8.5, 16) mmHg and 15 (13, 18) mmHg, respectively. There was a poor correlation between the simultaneously measured PCWP and LVEDP (R2 = 0.03, p = 0.66).ConclusionsThe PCWP may not correlate well with LVEDP in patients treated with VA-ECMO, particularly at high levels of VA-ECMO support.

Abstract Aims Cardiopulmonary stress test (CPX) is routinely performed when evaluating patient candidacy for left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The predictive value of hypotensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) response during CPX on clinical outcomes is unknown. This study aims to determine the effect of hypotensive SBP response during to clinical outcomes among patients who underwent LVAD implantation. Methods and results This was a retrospective single center study enrolling consecutive patients implanted with a continuous flow LVAD between 2011 and 2022. Hypotensive SBP response was defined as peak exercise SBP below the resting value. Multivariable Cox‐regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between hypotensive SBP response and all‐cause mortality within 30 and 90 days of LVAD implantation. A subgroup analysis was performed for patients implanted with a HeartMate III (HM III) device. Four hundred thirty‐two patients underwent LVAD implantation during the pre‐defined period and 156 with INTERMACS profiles 3–6 met our inclusion criteria. The median age was 63 years (IQR 54–69), and 52% had ischaemic cardiomyopathy. Hypotensive SBP response was present in 35% of patients and was associated with increased 90 day all‐cause mortality (unadjusted HR 9.16, 95% CI 1.98–42; P = 0.0046). Hazard ratio remained significant after adjusting for age, INTERMACS profile, serum creatinine, and total bilirubin. Findings were similar in the HM III subgroup. Conclusions Hypotensive SBP response on pre‐LVAD CPX is associated with increased perioperative and 90 day mortality after LVAD implantation. Additional studies are needed to determine the mechanism of increased mortality observed.

Abstract Aims Outflow graft obstruction is a poorly described complication following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) surgery. We sought to define the incidence of LVAD outflow graft obstruction and assess clinical outcomes with a percutaneous treatment strategy. Methods and results From January 2012 to October 2020, 322 patients with LVAD were managed at our institution. Patients with LVAD outflow graft obstruction were identified by cardiac computed tomography with angiography and invasive haemodynamic assessment and were subsequently treated with percutaneous intervention. Poisson regression was used to analyse time‐dependent differences in the incidence of LVAD outflow graft obstruction. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to estimate survival. Twenty patients (6.2%) developed haemodynamically significant LVAD outflow graft obstruction at a rate of 0.03 events per patient‐year. Outflow graft obstruction presented a median of 33 (26–49) months after surgery. Patients presented with low estimated LVAD pump flow (95%), heart failure (90%), or both (85%), and 59% developed cardiogenic shock prior to intervention. The most common aetiology identified by cardiac computed tomography with angiography was external compression of the outflow graft (78%). On presentation, the median peak gradient in the outflow graft was 78 (64–100) mmHg. Outflow graft stenting was 100% successful with no in‐hospital mortality, and it reduced the peak outflow graft gradient to 10 (2–17) mmHg (P

The steadily rising prevalence of heart failure (HF) and the associated increase in health care expenditures represent a significant burden for patients, caregivers, and society. Ambulatory management of worsening congestion is a complex undertaking that requires diuretic escalation, yet clinical success is often hindered by the progressively declining bioavailability of oral agents. Once beyond a threshold, patients with acute on chronic HF often require hospital admission for intravenous diuresis. A novel, pH neutral formulation of furosemide that is administered by a biphasic drug delivery profile (80 mg total over 5 ​hours) via an automated, on-body infusor was designed to overcome these limitations. Early studies have shown that it has equivalent bioavailability with comparable diuresis and natriuresis to the intravenous formulation, leads to significant decongestion, and improvement in quality of life. It was shown to be safe and is well tolerated by patients. Although there is one ongoing clinical trial, available data have demonstrated the potential to shift hospital-administered, intravenous diuresis to the outpatient setting. Reduction in the need for recurrent hospital admissions would be highly desirable by most patients with chronic HF and would lead to a significant reduction in health care expenditures. In this article, we describe the rationale and evolution of this novel PH neutral formulation of furosemide administered subcutaneously, summarize its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, and review emerging clinical trials demonstrating its clinical safety, efficacy, and potential to reduce health care expenditures.

Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic and consequent social isolation prompted a surge in mental health disorders and substance use in the general population and, therefore, in potential organ donors. We aimed to evaluate if this led to a change in donor characteristics, including the mechanism and circumstance of death, and how this may have affected clinical outcomes following heart transplantation. Methods: We identified all heart donors from the SRTR database between 18 October 2018 and 31 December 2021, excluding those who donated immediately after the US national emergency declaration. Donors were stratified into pre-COVID-19 (Pre-Cov; through 12 March 2020) and post-COVID-19 national emergency declaration cohorts (Post-Cov; 1 August 2020 through 31 December 2021) based on the heart procurement date. Relevant demographics, cause of death, and substance use history were collected in addition to graft cold ischemic time, the incidence of primary graft dysfunction (PGD), and recipient survival at 30 days post-transplant. Results: A total of 10,314 heart donors were identified; 4941 were stratified into the Pre-Cov and 5373 into the Post-Cov cohorts. There was no difference in demographics, but illicit drug use was significantly higher in the Post-Cov group, leading to an increased incidence of death from drug intoxication. Fatal gunshot wounds were also more common. Despite these changes, the incidence of PGD remained similar (p = 0.371), and there was no difference in 30 days recipient survival (p = 0.545). Conclusion: Our findings confirm that COVID-19 had a major impact on mental health and psychosocial life with an associated increase in illicit substance use and fatal intoxication rates in heart transplant donors. These changes did not alter peri-operative mortality following heart transplantation. Future studies are needed to ensure that long-term outcomes remain unaffected.

The rising incidence and recognition of cardiogenic shock has led to an increase in the use of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). As clinical experience with this therapy has increased, there has also been a rapid growth in the body of observational and randomized data describing the clinical and logistical considerations required to institute a VA-ECMO program with successful clinical outcomes. The aim of this review is to summarize this contemporary data in the context of four key themes that pertain to VA-ECMO programs: the principles of patient selection; basic hemodynamic and technical principles underlying VA-ECMO; contraindications to VA-ECMO therapy; and common complications and intensive care considerations that are encountered in the setting of VA-ECMO therapy.

Cardiogenic shock accounts for ~100,000 annual hospital admissions in the United States. Despite improvements in medical management strategies, in-hospital mortality remains unacceptably high. Multiple mechanical circulatory support devices have been developed with the aim to provide hemodynamic support and to improve outcomes in this population. Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is the most advanced temporary life support system that is unique in that it provides immediate and complete hemodynamic support as well as concomitant gas exchange. In this review, we discuss the fundamental concepts and hemodynamic aspects of VA-ECMO support in patients with cardiogenic shock of various etiologies. In addition, we review the common indications, contraindications and complications associated with VA-ECMO use.