Search

Abstract For most patients with childhood myelodysplastic syndrome (cMDS), allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo‐HSCT) remains the only curative option. In the case of increased blasts (cMDS‐IB), the benefit of pretransplant cytoreductive therapy remains controversial. In this multicenter retrospective study, the outcomes of all French children who underwent allo‐HSCT for cMDS reported in the SFGM‐TC registry between 2000 and 2020 were analyzed (n = 84). The median age at transplantation was 10.2 years. HSCT was performed from matched sibling donors (MSD) in 29% of the cases, matched unrelated donors (MUD) in 44%, haploidentical in 6%, and cord blood in 21%. Myeloablative conditioning was used in 91% of cases. Forty‐eight percent of patients presented with cMDS‐IB at diagnosis (median BM blasts: 8%). Among them, 50% received pretransplant cytoreductive therapy. Five‐year overall survival (OS), cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and relapse were 67%, 26%, and 12%, respectively. Six‐month cumulative incidence of grade II–IV acute graft‐versus‐host disease was 46%. Considering the whole cohort, age under 12, busulfan/cyclophosphamide/melphalan conditioning or MUD were associated with poorer 5‐year OS. In the cMDS‐IB subgroup, pretransplant cytoreductive therapy was associated with a better OS in univariate analysis. This seems to be mainly due to a decreased NRM since no impact on the incidence of relapse was observed. Overall, those data may argue in favor of cytoreduction for cMDS‐IB. They need to be confirmed on a larger scale and prospectively.

Abstract Defibrotide (DF) is indicated for the treatment of severe sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (SOS) following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), but its prophylactic use against SOS is not recommended yet. This study describes the impact of the preventive and curative use of DF on reducing the incidence and severity of SOS in children. Patients aged 0–19 years, who received allogenic HSCT after myeloablative conditioning regimen with busulfan or total body irradiation in our comprehensive cancer center, between 2013 and 2017, were included. The Baltimore or modified Seattle criteria were used for SOS diagnosis. SOS was graded using the 2017 European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation classification defining severity criteria of SOS in children. SOS occurrence tended to decrease with prophylactic DF, but no significant difference was observed in terms of severity. When not treated with preventive DF, 50% (19/38) of the patients with SOS were graded severe to very severe, but only 37% (7/19) had organ dysfunction. Curative DF was administered at a median of 2 days post‐HSCT, for a median of 6.5 days. The absence of fatal SOS supports the use of early curative DF with acceptable toxicities and questions the optimal duration of DF treatment.

Survival after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for severe idiopathic aplastic anemia (SAA) has improved in recent years, approaching 75% at 5 years. However, an SAA-adapted composite endpoint, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and relapse/rejection-free survival (GRFS), may more accurately assess patient outcomes beyond survival. We analyzed GRFS to identify risk factors and specific causes of GRFS failure. Our retrospective analysis from the Severe Aplastic Anemia Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation included 479 patients with idiopathic SAA who underwent allo-HSCT in two conventional situations: i) upfront allo-HSCT from a matched related donor (MRD) (upfront cohort), and ii) allo-HSCT for relapsed or refractory SAA (rel/ref cohort). Relevant events for GRFS calculation included graft failure, grade 3-4 acute GvHD, extensive chronic GvHD, and death. In the upfront cohort (n=209), 5-year GRFS was 77%. Late allo-HSCT (i.e., >6 months after SAA diagnosis) was the main poor prognostic factor, specifically increasing the risk of death as the cause of GRFS failure (hazard ratio [HR]=4.08; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-11.83; P=0.010). In the rel/ref cohort (n=270), 5-year GRFS was 61%. Age was the main factor significantly increasing the risk of death (HR=1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.06; P

Not available.