Search

Purpose: To perform a systematic review to assess the effect of capsular repair compared with nonrepair on patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) after hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Methods: We initially searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases, as well as ongoing clinical trials (https://clinicaltrials.gov), on December 15, 2022. The eligibility criteria were randomized controlled trials (Level Ⅰ) and prospective comparative studies (Level II) of patients who underwent capsular repair and nonrepair via hip arthroscopy with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years. We registered this protocol a priori on PROSPERO (identification No. CRD42021239306). We assessed the risk of bias using the Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) appraisal tool. Results: This review included 5 studies with a total of 639 patients (270 with capsular repair [average age, 35.4 years; 41% female patients] and 369 with nonrepair [average age, 37.3 years; 38% female patients]). In the included studies, surgical procedures consisting of labral repair and pincer or cam osteoplasty were performed via hip arthroscopy. The modified Harris Hip Score was measured in all the included studies, and the standardized mean difference in PROMs for capsular repair versus nonrepair in the included studies was 0.42 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20 to 0.63). A sensitivity analysis of randomized controlled trials achieved consistent results (standardized mean difference in PROMs, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.02 to 0.60). Capsular repair was not associated with a reduction in revision surgery (risk difference, –0.02; 95% CI, –0.06 to 0.03; 26 of 270 patients with capsular repair vs 42 of 369 with nonrepair) but was associated with a reduction in conversion to THA (risk difference, –0.05; 95% CI –0.09 to –0.01; 12 of 270 patients with capsular repair vs 38 of 369 with nonrepair). The average Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies (MINORS) score in the included studies was 20. Conclusions: Patients who undergo capsular repair in conjunction with other arthroscopic hip preservation techniques have better PROMs and a lower incidence of THA conversion. Level of Evidence: Level II, systematic review of Level I and II investigations.

Purpose: To quantify the cartilage surface profile visualized during arthroscopic surgery and examine its clinical utility by comparing the results of quantitative measurements with a conventional grading system. Methods: Fifty consecutive patients diagnosed with knee osteoarthritis and who underwent arthroscopic surgery were included in this study. A 4 K camera system was used, and the cartilage surface profile was visualized using the augmented reality imaging program. The highlighted image was displayed in 2 colors: black (the worn cartilage area) and green (the part where the cartilage thickness was maintained). The percentage of the green area was calculated using ImageJ and used as an index of cartilage degeneration. The quantitative value was statistically compared with the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) grade as a conventional macroscopic evaluation. Results: In the quantitative measurement, the median percentage of the green area was 60.7 at ICRS grades 0 and 1 (interquartile range [IQR], 67.3-51.0), 47.2 at grade 2 (IQR, 54.1-39.2), 36.5 at grade 3 (IQR, 43.2-30.4), and 34.0 at grade 4 (IQR, 38.5-29.3). There was a significant difference between the macroscopic grades, except for Grades 3 and 4. There was a significant negative correlation between macroscopic evaluation and quantitative measurement (r = −0.672, P < .001). Conclusions: The quantitative measurement of the cartilage surface profile using the spectroscopic absorption technique was significantly correlated with the conventional macroscopic grading system and demonstrated fair to good inter-rater and intra-rater reliabilities. Level of Evidence: Level II, diagnostic (prospective cohort study).

Purpose: To investigate the clinical outcomes following meniscus allograft transplantation (MAT) to replace removed discoid lateral meniscus using intact lateral meniscus obtained from patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty for medial compartment osteoarthritis. Methods: Pediatric patients who underwent MAT secondary to partial or total meniscectomy due to discoid lateral meniscus between August 2010 and November 2018 were identified. Lateral menisci with bone blocks were transplanted arthroscopically. The demographic data, range of motion, meniscal allograft failure, which was defined as removal of an implanted meniscus, and complications were recorded. The Lysholm score and the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade on radiographs were evaluated preoperatively and at final follow-up. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score was evaluated in the final follow-up. Results: Eight patients who were symptomatic after discoid lateral meniscectomy were included. Donated allografts were harvested from adult patients aged between 64 and 78 years (mean 70.5 years). The mean age at previous meniscectomy and MAT were 10.5 and 18.1 years, respectively. All patients were followed up for a mean time of 5.2 years, and there were no cases of meniscus failure and complication. The Lysholm score significantly improved from preoperative to the final follow-up. Preoperatively, 6 and 2 knees were of KL grades II and III, respectively. At final follow-up, no increased KL grade was observed in 5 patients; however, an increase by 1 grade was observed in 2 patients and an increase by 2 grades was observed in 1 patient. The Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores at the final follow-up were 87.2 for pain, 87.9 for symptoms, 95.4 for activities of daily living, 79.4 for sports, and 65.6 for quality of life. Conclusions: Older lateral meniscus allografts obtained from knees of adult patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty and transplanted into younger patients with defects from discoid lateral meniscectomy resulted in improved Lysholm scores but no improvement in Tegner scores or knee motion. KL grades were unchanged in 5 of the 8 patients at the final follow-up. Level of Evidence: IV, therapeutic case series.